Modeling a version of the good-genes hypothesis: female choice of locally adapted males

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
K REINHOLD
Keyword(s):  
Female Choice ◽  
Good Genes

scholarly journals GOOD GENES DRIVE FEMALE CHOICE FOR MATING PARTNERS IN THE LEK-BREEDING EUROPEAN TREEFROG

Evolution ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Jaquiéry ◽  
Thomas Broquet ◽  
Cécile Aguilar ◽  
Guillaume Evanno ◽  
Nicolas Perrin
Keyword(s):  
Female Choice ◽  
Good Genes

Diet-dependent female choice for males with ‘good genes’ in a soil predatory mite

Nature ◽  
10.1038/44125 ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 401 (6753) ◽  
pp. 581-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabela Lesna ◽  
Maurice W. Sabelis
Keyword(s):  
Female Choice ◽  
Predatory Mite ◽  
Good Genes

Female choice for good genes and sex-biased broods in guppies

2001 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 843-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Watt ◽  
A. J. Shohet ◽  
K. Renshaw
Keyword(s):  
Female Choice ◽  
Good Genes

Current versus future, not genes versus parenting

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-598
Author(s):  
James S. Chisholm ◽  
David A. Coall
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Female Choice ◽  
Reproductive Strategies ◽  
Good Genes ◽  
Future Reproduction

Gangestad & Simpson's model of the evolution of within-sex differences in reproductive strategies requires a degree of female choice that probably did not exist because of male coercion. We argue as well that the tradeoff between current and future reproduction accounts for more of the within-sex differences in reproductive strategies than the “good-genes-good parenting” tradeoff they propose.

Song and female choice: good genes and big brains?

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 358-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive K. Catchpole
Keyword(s):  
Female Choice ◽  
Good Genes

scholarly journals Fixed and dilutable benefits: female choice for good genes or fertility

2011 ◽  
Vol 279 (1727) ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Tazzyman ◽  
Robert M. Seymour ◽  
Andrew Pomiankowski
Keyword(s):  
Simple Model ◽  
Mate Choice ◽  
Female Choice ◽  
Female Preference ◽  
Major Effect ◽  
Good Genes ◽  
Direct Benefit

Benefits accruing to females who exercise mate choice have been defined to be either ‘direct’ or ‘indirect’. We suggest an alternative distinction: benefits can be considered ‘fixed’, meaning they are on average equal to all females mating with the same male (e.g. good genes' benefits) or ‘dilutable’, meaning they are shared between females mating with the same male, so that the more mates a male has, the lower the average benefit to each (e.g. fertility benefits or many forms of direct benefit). Using a simple model, we show that this distinction has a major effect on the form of female preference. We predict that mating skew will be far greater in species where the benefits are fixed when compared with those where the benefits are dilutable.

scholarly journals When are good genes good? Variable outcomes of female choice in wax moths

1997 ◽  
Vol 264 (1384) ◽  
pp. 1057-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng-You Jia ◽  
Michael D. Greenfield
Keyword(s):  
Female Choice ◽  
Good Genes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document