Vitamin D and diabetic nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nutrition ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1189-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoda Derakhshanian ◽  
Sakineh Shab-Bidar ◽  
John R. Speakman ◽  
Hoda Nadimi ◽  
Kurosh Djafarian
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangyang  Wang ◽  
Shikun  Yang ◽  
Qianying  Zhou ◽  
Hao  Zhang ◽  
Bin  Yi

Background/Aims: Vitamin D (VD) is widely recognized as renal protective. However, whether VD supplementation provides benefit to patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) remains controversial. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the impact of VD supplementation on indexes of renal function, inflammation and glycemic control in DN patients, and to explore the potential renal protective mechanism of VD. Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and three major Chinese biomedical databases (CNKI, WANGFANG and VIP) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of VD or its analogs in DN patients, published between September 2007 and July 2018. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two authors, according to the Cochrane systematic review methods. Meta-analysis based on the extracted results were performed via Revman 5.2 software. Results: We included 20 RCTs representing 1,464 patients with DN in this meta-analysis. VD supplementation significantly reduced 24-hour urine protein [MD = -0.26; 95% CI (-0.34, -0.17); P < 0.00001; I2 = 95%], UAER [MD = -67.36; 95% CI (-91.96, -42.76); P < 0.00001; I2 = 97%], hs-CRP [MD = -0.69; 95% CI (-0.86,-0.53); P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%], TNF-α [MD = -56.79; 95% CI (-77.05, -36.52); P < 0.00001; I2 = 89%] and IL-6 [MD = -0.73; 95% CI(-1.03, -0.44); P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%]. However, VD supplementation failed to decrease SCr [MD = -0.83; 95% CI (-3.67,2.02); P = 0.57; I2 = 0%] or increase eGFR [MD = 2.13; 95% CI (-2.06, 6.32); P = 0.32; I2 = 0%]. In addition, VD supplementation showed no impact on indexes of glycemic control, such as HbA1c [MD = 0.01; 95% CI (-0.09, 0.11); P = 0.84; I2 = 0%] and FBG [MD = -0.05; 95% CI (-0.29, 0.20); P = 0.70; I2 = 0%]. Analysis of 24-hour urine protein, SCr, eGFR, hs-CRP or HbA1c revealed no difference between subgroups based on the type of VD supplementation, including calcitriol, alfacalcidol and vitamin D3, and the dose or duration of calcitriol usage. Conclusion: In patients with DN, VD supplementation provides beneficial effects on 24-hour urine protein and inflammation indexes, but not on SCr, eGFR or glycemic control indexes. More RCTs that comprehensively evaluate the impact of VD supplementation on indexes of renal function, inflammation and glycemic control in DN atients are required in order to reach conclusive results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeline Jeyakumar ◽  
Vidhya Shinde ◽  
Reshma Ravindran

Abstract Background Vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women is a public health concern globally. In India, individual studies report high prevalence. However, lack of national data masks the true burden. This work determined the pooled prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women in India through a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Methods Three different search engines yielded 15 eligible articles. Study quality was assessed by 10 different criteria and summary of study quality was categorized as per Cochrane standards. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy pregnant women and heterogeneity among selected studies. A sample of n = 4088 was used to study the pooled prevalence among pregnant women. Results The random effects combined estimate was 32.35% (95% CI, (12.58–117.48). High heterogeneity (tau2 = 0.39, I2 = 100%) and high risk of bias was observed among the selected studies. The test for overall effect was observed to be z = 2.54(P = 0.01). Conclusion Pooled estimate > 30% emphasizes the need for screening through antenatal care services and initiate preventive measures to address the deficiency.


2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110193
Author(s):  
Emilija Stojanović ◽  
Dragan Radovanović ◽  
Tamara Hew-Butler ◽  
Dušan Hamar ◽  
Vladimir Jakovljević

Context: Despite growing interest in quantifying and correcting vitamin D inadequacy in basketball players, a critical synthesis of these data is yet to be performed to overcome the low generalizability of findings from individual studies. Objective: To provide a comprehensive analysis of data in basketball pertaining to (1) the prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy; (2) the effects of vitamin D supplementation on 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration (and its association with body composition), bone health, and performance; and (3) crucial aspects that warrant further investigation. Data Sources: PubMed, MEDLINE, ERIC, Google Scholar, SCIndex, and ScienceDirect databases were searched. Study Selection: After screening, 15 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Data Extraction: The prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy, serum 25(OH)D, body composition, stress fractures, and physical performance were extracted. Results: The pooled prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy for 527 basketball players in 14 studies was 77% ( P < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.70-0.84). Supplementation with 4000 IU/d and 4000 IU/wk (absolute mean difference [AMD]: 25.39 nmol/L; P < 0.001; 95% CI, 13.44-37.33), as well as 10,000 IU/d (AMD: 100.01; P < 0.001; 95% CI, 70.39-129.63) vitamin D restored 25(OH)D to normal concentrations. Body composition data revealed inverse correlations between changes in serum 25(OH)D (from pre- to postsupplementation) and body fat ( r = −0.80; very large). Data concerning positive impacts of vitamin D supplementation on bone health and physical performance remain sparse. Conclusion: The high proportion of vitamin D inadequacy underscores the need to screen for serum 25(OH)D in basketball players. Although supplementation restored vitamin D sufficiency, the beneficial effects on bone health and physical performance remain sparse. Adiposity can modulate 25(OH)D response to supplementation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document