scholarly journals Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools for predicting clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients

Nutrition ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 721-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Raslan ◽  
Maria Cristina Gonzalez ◽  
Maria Carolina Gonçalves Dias ◽  
Mariana Nascimento ◽  
Melina Castro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

scholarly journals Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools for predictingsarcopenia in hospitalized patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 1362-1369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet YÜRÜYEN ◽  
Hakan YAVUZER ◽  
Serap YAVUZER ◽  
Mahir CENGİZ ◽  
Filiz DEMİRDAĞ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

scholarly journals Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) as a tool to predict clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients: a literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago Rocha de Pinho ◽  
Simone Mayane Mendes dos Santos ◽  
Renara Leite Rodrigues Rocha
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Nutritional Support ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

The presence of malnutrition in hospitalized patients is prevalent and studies show its association with a higher incidence of complications, mortality, length of stay, costs, and increased frequency of hospital readmission. Routine use of simple tracking procedures is recommended. Nutritional screening detects individuals who are malnourished or at risk of developing malnutrition, and who can receive specific nutritional support. Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) is a nutritional screening method recommended by the European Society for Clinical and Metabolism (ESPEN) and identifies the risk of developing malnutrition in hospitalized patients. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on the NRS screening method (2002) and its relationship with clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients.

scholarly journals A comparison of nutritional-risk screening tools in an acute specialist cardio-thoracic NHS Trust

2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (OCE3) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Robson ◽  
G. V. Ravenhill ◽  
F. Gorman ◽  
M. Carby ◽  
S. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

scholarly journals Selection and optimization of nutritional risk screening tools for esophageal cancer patients in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Dong ◽  
Xiguang Liu ◽  
Shunfang Zhu ◽  
Di Lu ◽  
Kaican Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

scholarly journals Nutritional Risk Screening Tools for Elderly Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Franciole de Oliveira Silva ◽  
Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lima ◽  
Karine Cavalcanti Mauricio Sena-Evangelista ◽  
Dirce Marchioni ◽  
Ricardo Ney Cobucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high risk of malnutrition, primarily in elderly people; assessing nutritional risk using appropriate screening tools is critical. This systematic review identified applicable tools and assessed their measurement properties. Literature was searched in the MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS databases. Four studies conducted in China met the eligibility criteria. Sample sizes ranged from six to 182, and participants’ ages from 65 to 87 years. Seven nutritional screening and assessment tools were used: the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), MNA-short form (MNA-sf), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Geriatric NRI (GNRI), and modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score. Nutritional risk was identified in 27.5% to 100% of participants. The NRS-2002, MNA, MNA-sf, NRI, and MUST demonstrated high sensitivity; the MUST had better specificity. The MNA and MUST demonstrated better criterion validity. The MNA-sf demonstrated better predictive validity for poor appetite and weight loss; the NRS-2002 demonstrated better predictive validity for prolonged hospitalization. mNUTRIC score demonstrated good predictive validity for hospital mortality. Most instruments demonstrate high sensitivity for identifying nutritional risk, but none are acknowledged as the best for nutritional screening in elderly COVID-19 patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document