Associations of coeliac disease with coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 816-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Heikkilä ◽  
O.A. Koskinen ◽  
A. Agarwal ◽  
K.A.O. Tikkinen ◽  
M. Mäki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Cerebrovascular Disease ◽  
Coeliac Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Yoga for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 102643
Author(s):  
Jingen Li ◽  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Xuezeng Hao ◽  
Dimitrios Kantas ◽  
Essa A. Mohamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Clinical Therapeutic Effects of Aspirin in Combination with Fufang Danshen Diwan, a Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula, on Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1955-1963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianchun Huang ◽  
Xiaojun Tang ◽  
Fangxing Ye ◽  
Junhui He ◽  
Xiaolong Kong
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Aspirin Therapy ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Chinese Medicine Formula

Background/Aims: Coronary heart disease is characterized by vascular stenosis or occlusion resulting in myocardial ischemia, hypoxia and necrosis. In China, the combination of aspirin and Fufang Danshen Diwan (FDD), a traditional Chinese medicine formula, has been suggested in the treatment of coronary heart disease. There have been several studies comparing the effectiveness of aspirin alone and in combination with FDD to treat coronary artery disease; however, it remains unclear whether combined aspirin therapy is superior. This study was thus designed to clarify this issue through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Wanfang Data and VIP Information were searched. Papers were reviewed systematically by two researchers and analyzed using Cochrane software Revman 5.1. Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trials enrolling 1367 subjects were included. Meta-analyses revealed that aspirin in combination with FDD was significantly more effective at alleviating angina pectoris and improving electrocardiogram (ECG) results relative to aspirin therapy alone, reflected by the summary effects for the clinical markedly effective (OR = 2.45; 95% CI 1.95-3.08) and the total effective (OR = 3.92; 95% CI 2.87-5.36) rates. In addition, combined aspirin and FDD was significantly more efficacious than aspirin monotherapy at improving blood lipid levels, as indicated by the following outcomes: 1) reduction of TC level (SMD −1.12; 95% CI −1.49 to −0.76); 2) reduction of TG level (SMD −0.94; 95% CI −1.15 to -0.74); 3) reduction of LDL level (SMD -0.68; 95% CI -0.88 to -0.48); and 4) improvement of HDL level (SMD 0.52; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.99 ). No serious adverse events were reported in any of the included trials. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that aspirin in combination with FDD was more effective than aspirin alone for treating coronary heart disease. More full-scale randomized clinical trials with reliable designs are recommended to further evaluate the clinical benefits and long-term effectiveness of FDD for the treatment of coronary heart disease.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of TCMI in Patients With Combined Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penglu Wei ◽  
Kuo Yang ◽  
Dehuai Long ◽  
Yupei Tan ◽  
Wenlong Xing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Effectiveness Rate

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of conventional treatments (CTs) to those that included traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) in patients with combined coronary heart disease and heart failure (CHD-HF).Methods: Eight electronic literature databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database) were searched from their inceptions to May 18, 2021, to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes analyzed included the total effectiveness rate and adverse events (ADRs). The secondary outcomes analyzed included the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and 6-min walk test (6MWT). Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess quality of the analyzed RCTs. Stata and OpenBUGS software were used to prior to the systematic review and network meta-analysis.Results: Sixty-one eligible trials involved 5,567 patients and one of the following 15 TCMIs: Shuxuetong, Shenmai, Shenfu, Shengmai, Danshenduofenyansuan, Danhong, Dazhuhongjingtian, Xinmailong, Dengzhanxixin, Gualoupi, Shuxuening, Xuesaitong, Yiqi Fumai, Shenqi Fuzheng, Huangqi. Network meta-analysis revealed that Shuxuetong injection + CT group was superior to CT only in improving the total effectiveness rate [odds ratio (OR): 7.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17–27.41]. Shenmai injection + CT was superior to CT only for LVEF (OR: 8.97, CI: 4.67–13.18), Xinmailong injection + CT was superior to CT only for NT-proBNP (OR: −317.70, CI: −331.10–303.10), Shenqi Fuzheng injection + CT was superior to CT only for BNP (OR: −257.30, CI: −308.40–242.80); and Danhong injection + CT was superior to CT only for 6MWT (OR: 84.40, CI: 62.62−106.20). Different TCMIs had different toxicity spectrums.Conclusion: TCMIs combined with CT are better than CT alone in treating CHD-HF. Different TCMIs improve different outcomes. Additional properly designed RCTs are needed to conduce a more refined comparison of various TCMIs.Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42021258263].

scholarly journals Sugar Sweetened Beverages Intake and Risk of Non-Communicable Chronic Diseases in Longitudinal Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with 1.5 Million Individuals

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Pozza Santos ◽  
Denise Petrucci Gigante ◽  
Felipe Mendes Delpino ◽  
Ana Paula Maciel ◽  
Renata Moraes Bielemann
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Longitudinal Studies ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sugar Sweetened Beverages ◽  
Sweetened Beverages

Abstract This study aimed to examine longitudinal associations between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) intake and type 2 diabetes, obesity, coronary heart disease and stroke in adults. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis searching for articles in the Pubmed, Lilacs, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases. After screening of titles and abstracts, 27 longitudinal studies were included for the narrative synthesis with all of them presenting medium or high methodological quality. None of the selected studies were from low-income countries and only three were conducted in middle-income countries. Type 2 diabetes was the most investigated disease – outcome in 15 out of 27 studies. Around 80% of the studies enrolled more than 10,000 individuals in the sample, and almost half of them followed the subjects for less than 10 years. A total of 1.5 million individuals were included in the pooled analyses, and results indicated that SSB intake increased the risk of type 2 diabetes (RR = 1.20; 95%C.I. 1.13 – 1.28), obesity (RR = 1.17; 95%C.I. 1.10 – 1.25), coronary heart disease (RR = 1.15; 95%C.I. 1.06 – 1.25), and stroke (RR = 1.10; 95%C.I. 1.01 – 1.19) in adults after adjustment for all potential confounders. Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that consumption of SSB intake appears to increase the risk non-communicable chronic disease, being the strongest evidence for type 2 diabetes. Actions are needed to be taken to reduce the SSB intake and its consequences worldwide.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document