Effects of target electron collisions on energy loss straggling in plasmas of all degeneracies

2007 ◽  
Vol 577 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 371-375
Author(s):  
Manuel D. Barriga Carrasco
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Target Electron ◽  
Electron Collisions

ENERGY DEPOSITION OF RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS IN SUPER-HOT PLASMA

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (27) ◽  
pp. 1855-1862 ◽  
Author(s):  
TONG-CHENG WU ◽  
XUAN ZHANG ◽  
WEI-KE AN
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Energy Loss ◽  
Energy Deposition ◽  
Plasma Oscillation ◽  
Lorentz Factor ◽  
Relativistic Electrons ◽  
Exact Relation ◽  
Loss Mechanism ◽  
Electron Collisions ◽  
Thermonuclear Fuel

The intense ultrashort laser interacting with the thermonuclear fuel may produce a relativistic plasma and MeV electron beam, how to fix the Lorentz factors of the particles in the plasma and model the energy deposition of MeV electron beams are important subjects. In this letter, we demonstrate the exact relation between the average Lorentz factor and the temperature of the system; and then obtained the relativistic modified formula for the energy loss of the relativistic electron-beam due to binary electron-electron collisions. Another important energy loss mechanism, the excitation of Langmuir collective plasma oscillation, is also treated within the relativistic framework. Hence, we re-examine theoretically the possibility of igniting hot spots in the super-compressed DT target and the answer is that the fast ignitor scenario is able to yield thermonuclear ignition in the target.

scholarly journals Applying full conserving dielectric function to the energy loss straggling

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel D. Barriga-Carrasco
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Dielectric Function ◽  
Collision Frequency ◽  
Random Phase ◽  
Momentum Conservation ◽  
Plasma Electron ◽  
Electron Collision ◽  
Electron Collisions ◽  
First Time

AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to calculate proton energy loss straggling using a full conserving dielectric function (FCDF) for plasmas at any degeneracy. This dielectric function takes into account plasma electron-electron collision considering density, momentum, and energy conservation. When only momentum conservation law is accomplished, the FCDF reproduces the well known Mermin dielectric function, when none of the conservations laws are obeyed, the random phase approximation (RPA) is recovered. Then, the FCDF is applied for the first time to the determination of the energy loss straggling. Differences among diverse dielectric functions to determine straggling follow the same behavior for all kind of plasmas then, they do not depend on the plasma degeneracy but essentially do on the value of the collision frequency. These discrepancies can rise up to 5% between FCDF values and the Mermin ones, and 2% between the FCDF ones and RPA ones for plasma with high enough collision frequency. The similarity between FCDF and RPA results is not surprising, as all conservation laws are also considered in RPA dielectric function. The fact that FCDF and RPA give similar results and the fact that FCDF considers electron-electron collisions and RPA does not, means that latter collisions are not significant for energy loss straggling calculations.

Inelastic Electron-Matter Interactions

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-267
Author(s):  
J. Silcox
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Energy Loss ◽  
Chemical Structure ◽  
Inelastic Electron ◽  
Primary Concern ◽  
Unique Probe ◽  
Introductory Paper ◽  
Elastic Processes ◽  
Experimental Level ◽  
Inelastic Processes

In this introductory paper, my primary concern will be in identifying and outlining the various types of inelastic processes resulting from the interaction of electrons with matter. Elastic processes are understood reasonably well at the present experimental level and can be regarded as giving information on spatial arrangements. We need not consider them here. Inelastic processes do contain information of considerable value which reflect the electronic and chemical structure of the sample. In combination with the spatial resolution of the electron microscope, a unique probe of materials is finally emerging (Hillier 1943, Watanabe 1955, Castaing and Henri 1962, Crewe 1966, Wittry, Ferrier and Cosslett 1969, Isaacson and Johnson 1975, Egerton, Rossouw and Whelan 1976, Kokubo and Iwatsuki 1976, Colliex, Cosslett, Leapman and Trebbia 1977). We first review some scattering terminology by way of background and to identify some of the more interesting and significant features of energy loss electrons and then go on to discuss examples of studies of the type of phenomena encountered. Finally we will comment on some of the experimental factors encountered.

Data Acquisition and Handling Unit for a Quantitative Use of Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

1977 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 232-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Trebbia ◽  
P. Ballongue ◽  
C. Colliex
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Energy Loss ◽  
Electron Energy ◽  
Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy ◽  
Single Channel ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Surface Barrier ◽  
Solid State Detector ◽  
Electrostatic Mirror ◽  
Electron Energy Loss

An effective use of electron energy loss spectroscopy for chemical characterization of selected areas in the electron microscope can only be achieved with the development of quantitative measurements capabilities.The experimental assembly, which is sketched in Fig.l, has therefore been carried out. It comprises four main elements.The analytical transmission electron microscope is a conventional microscope fitted with a Castaing and Henry dispersive unit (magnetic prism and electrostatic mirror). Recent modifications include the improvement of the vacuum in the specimen chamber (below 10-6 torr) and the adaptation of a new electrostatic mirror.The detection system, similar to the one described by Hermann et al (1), is located in a separate chamber below the fluorescent screen which visualizes the energy loss spectrum. Variable apertures select the electrons, which have lost an energy AE within an energy window smaller than 1 eV, in front of a surface barrier solid state detector RTC BPY 52 100 S.Q. The saw tooth signal delivered by a charge sensitive preamplifier (decay time of 5.10-5 S) is amplified, shaped into a gaussian profile through an active filter and counted by a single channel analyser.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document