scholarly journals Activity-Dependent Matching of Excitatory and Inhibitory Inputs during Refinement of Visual Receptive Fields

Neuron ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 829-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huizhong W. Tao ◽  
Mu-ming Poo
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Receptive Fields ◽  
Activity Dependent

scholarly journals Activity-dependent development of visual receptive fields

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 136-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Thompson ◽  
Alexandra Gribizis ◽  
Chinfei Chen ◽  
Michael C Crair
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Dependent Development ◽  
Visual Receptive Fields ◽  
Activity Dependent

scholarly journals Resolving single cone inputs to visual receptive fields

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 967-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence C Sincich ◽  
Yuhua Zhang ◽  
Pavan Tiruveedhula ◽  
Jonathan C Horton ◽  
Austin Roorda
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Receptive Fields ◽  
Single Cone

Visual receptive fields of local intracortical potentials

1988 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Lohmann ◽  
R. Eckhorn ◽  
H.J. Reitboeck
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Receptive Fields

scholarly journals Eye-centered visual receptive fields in the ventral intraparietal area

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Chen ◽  
Gregory C. DeAngelis ◽  
Dora E. Angelaki
Keyword(s):  
Optic Flow ◽  
Reference Frames ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Spatial Reference Frames ◽  
Visual Receptive Fields ◽  
Ventral Intraparietal Area

The ventral intraparietal area (VIP) processes multisensory visual, vestibular, tactile, and auditory signals in diverse reference frames. We recently reported that visual heading signals in VIP are represented in an approximately eye-centered reference frame when measured using large-field optic flow stimuli. No VIP neuron was found to have head-centered visual heading tuning, and only a small proportion of cells had reference frames that were intermediate between eye- and head-centered. In contrast, previous studies using moving bar stimuli have reported that visual receptive fields (RFs) in VIP are head-centered for a substantial proportion of neurons. To examine whether these differences in previous findings might be due to the neuronal property examined (heading tuning vs. RF measurements) or the type of visual stimulus used (full-field optic flow vs. a single moving bar), we have quantitatively mapped visual RFs of VIP neurons using a large-field, multipatch, random-dot motion stimulus. By varying eye position relative to the head, we tested whether visual RFs in VIP are represented in head- or eye-centered reference frames. We found that the vast majority of VIP neurons have eye-centered RFs with only a single neuron classified as head-centered and a small minority classified as intermediate between eye- and head-centered. Our findings suggest that the spatial reference frames of visual responses in VIP may depend on the visual stimulation conditions used to measure RFs and might also be influenced by how attention is allocated during stimulus presentation.

scholarly journals Visual receptive fields and clustering

1983 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 553-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelia Micheli-Tzanakou
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Receptive Fields
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document