scholarly journals Stop Codon Recognition by Release Factors Induces Structural Rearrangement of the Ribosomal Decoding Center that Is Productive for Peptide Release

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine M. Youngman ◽  
Shan L. He ◽  
Laura J. Nikstad ◽  
Rachel Green
2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 1080-1095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suniti Vaishya ◽  
Vikash Kumar ◽  
Ankit Gupta ◽  
Mohammad Imran Siddiqi ◽  
Saman Habib

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. E382-E389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Philipp Hoernes ◽  
Nina Clementi ◽  
Michael Andreas Juen ◽  
Xinying Shi ◽  
Klaus Faserl ◽  
...  

Termination of protein synthesis is triggered by the recognition of a stop codon at the ribosomal A site and is mediated by class I release factors (RFs). Whereas in bacteria, RF1 and RF2 promote termination at UAA/UAG and UAA/UGA stop codons, respectively, eukaryotes only depend on one RF (eRF1) to initiate peptide release at all three stop codons. Based on several structural as well as biochemical studies, interactions between mRNA, tRNA, and rRNA have been proposed to be required for stop codon recognition. In this study, the influence of these interactions was investigated by using chemically modified stop codons. Single functional groups within stop codon nucleotides were substituted to weaken or completely eliminate specific interactions between the respective mRNA and RFs. Our findings provide detailed insight into the recognition mode of bacterial and eukaryotic RFs, thereby revealing the chemical groups of nucleotides that define the identity of stop codons and provide the means to discriminate against noncognate stop codons or UGG sense codons.


1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1113-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Nakamura ◽  
Koichi Ito ◽  
Kiyoyuki Matsumura ◽  
Yoichi Kawazu ◽  
Kanae Ebihara

Translation termination requires codon-dependent polypeptide release factors. The mechanism of stop codon recognition by release factors is unknown and holds considerable interest since it entails protein–RNA recognition rather than the well-understood mRNA–tRNA interaction in codon–anticodon pairing. Bacteria have two codon-specific release factors and our picture of prokaryotic translation is changing because a third factor, which stimulates the other two, has now been found. Moreover, a highly conserved eukaryotic protein family possessing properties of polypeptide release factor has now been sought. This review summarizes our current understanding of the structural and functional organization of release factors as well as our recent findings of highly conserved structural motifs in bacterial and eukaryotic polypeptide release factors.Key words: translation termination, stop codon recognition, peptide chain release factors, seven-domain model.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Egor Svidritskiy ◽  
Andrei A. Korostelev

AbstractTranslation termination ensures proper lengths of cellular proteins. During termination, release factor (RF) recognizes a stop codon and catalyzes peptide release. Conformational changes in RF are thought to underlie accurate translation termination. If true, the release factor should bind the A-site codon in inactive (compact) conformation(s), but structural studies of ribosome termination complexes have only captured RFs in an extended, active conformation. Here, we identify a hyper-accurate RF1 variant, and present crystal structures of 70S termination complexes that suggest a structural pathway for RF1 activation. In the presence of blasticidin S, the catalytic domain of RF1 is removed from the peptidyl-transferase center, whereas the codon-recognition domain is fully engaged in stop-codon recognition in the decoding center. RF1 codon recognition induces decoding-center rearrangements that precede accommodation of the catalytic domain. Our findings suggest how structural dynamics of RF1 and the ribosome coordinate stop-codon recognition with peptide release, ensuring accurate translation termination.


2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 3409-3418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amédée des Georges ◽  
Yaser Hashem ◽  
Anett Unbehaun ◽  
Robert A. Grassucci ◽  
Derek Taylor ◽  
...  

Abstract Eukaryotic translation termination results from the complex functional interplay between two release factors, eRF1 and eRF3, in which GTP hydrolysis by eRF3 couples codon recognition with peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis by eRF1. Here, we present a cryo-electron microscopy structure of pre-termination complexes associated with eRF1•eRF3•GDPNP at 9.7 -Å resolution, which corresponds to the initial pre-GTP hydrolysis stage of factor attachment and stop codon recognition. It reveals the ribosomal positions of eRFs and provides insights into the mechanisms of stop codon recognition and triggering of eRF3’s GTPase activity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 2684-2699
Author(s):  
Ka-Weng Ieong ◽  
Gabriele Indrisiunaite ◽  
Arjun Prabhakar ◽  
Joseph D Puglisi ◽  
Måns Ehrenberg

Abstract We used quench flow to study how N6-methylated adenosines (m6A) affect the accuracy ratio between kcat/Km (i.e. association rate constant (ka) times probability (Pp) of product formation after enzyme-substrate complex formation) for cognate and near-cognate substrate for mRNA reading by tRNAs and peptide release factors 1 and 2 (RFs) during translation with purified Escherichia coli components. We estimated kcat/Km for Glu-tRNAGlu, EF-Tu and GTP forming ternary complex (T3) reading cognate (GAA and Gm6AA) or near-cognate (GAU and Gm6AU) codons. ka decreased 10-fold by m6A introduction in cognate and near-cognate cases alike, while Pp for peptidyl transfer remained unaltered in cognate but increased 10-fold in near-cognate case leading to 10-fold amino acid substitution error increase. We estimated kcat/Km for ester bond hydrolysis of P-site bound peptidyl-tRNA by RF2 reading cognate (UAA and Um6AA) and near-cognate (UAG and Um6AG) stop codons to decrease 6-fold or 3-fold by m6A introduction, respectively. This 6-fold effect on UAA reading was also observed in a single-molecule termination assay. Thus, m6A reduces both sense and stop codon reading accuracy by decreasing cognate significantly more than near-cognate kcat/Km, in contrast to most error inducing agents and mutations, which increase near-cognate at unaltered cognate kcat/Km.


2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 1378-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam K. Kallmeyer ◽  
Kim M. Keeling ◽  
David M. Bedwell

ABSTRACT Protein synthesis requires a large commitment of cellular resources and is highly regulated. Previous studies have shown that a number of factors that mediate the initiation and elongation steps of translation are regulated by phosphorylation. In this report, we show that a factor involved in the termination step of protein synthesis is also subject to phosphorylation. Our results indicate that eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) is phosphorylated in vivo at serine 421 and serine 432 by the CK2 protein kinase (previously casein kinase II) in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Phosphorylation of eRF1 has little effect on the efficiency of stop codon recognition or nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Also, phosphorylation is not required for eRF1 binding to the other translation termination factor, eRF3. In addition, we provide evidence that the putative phosphatase Sal6p does not dephosphorylate eRF1 and that the state of eRF1 phosphorylation does not influence the allosuppressor phenotype associated with a sal6Δ mutation. Finally, we show that phosphorylation of eRF1 is a dynamic process that is dependent upon carbon source availability. Since many other proteins involved in protein synthesis have a CK2 protein kinase motif near their extreme C termini, we propose that this represents a common regulatory mechanism that is shared by factors involved in all three stages of protein synthesis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (16) ◽  
pp. 7766-7776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandr Ivanov ◽  
Tatyana Mikhailova ◽  
Boris Eliseev ◽  
Lahari Yeramala ◽  
Elizaveta Sokolova ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document