Collateral ligament length change patterns after joint line elevation may not explain midflexion instability following TKA

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1303-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian König ◽  
Georg Matziolis ◽  
Alexey Sharenkov ◽  
William R. Taylor ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Change ◽  
Joint Line ◽  
Ligament Length ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Midflexion Instability

Change in collateral ligament length and tibiofemoral movement following joint line variation in TKA

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 2498-2505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun-Jhih Lin ◽  
Hung-Wen Wei ◽  
Chang-Hung Huang ◽  
Yu-Liang Liu ◽  
Wen-Chuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Joint Line ◽  
Ligament Length ◽  
Collateral Ligament

scholarly journals Medial collateral ligament reconstruction graft isometry is effected by femoral position more than tibial position

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Kittl ◽  
James Robinson ◽  
Michael J. Raschke ◽  
Arne Olbrich ◽  
Andre Frank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Length Change ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Complex Behaviour ◽  
Femoral Attachment ◽  
Attachment Sites ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Length Changes ◽  
Graft Length

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the length change patterns of the native medial structures of the knee and determine the effect on graft length change patterns for different tibial and femoral attachment points for previously described medial reconstructions. Methods Eight cadaveric knee specimens were prepared by removing the skin and subcutaneous fat. The sartorius fascia was divided to allow clear identification of the medial ligamentous structures. Knees were then mounted in a custom-made rig and the quadriceps muscle and the iliotibial tract were loaded, using cables and hanging weights. Threads were mounted between tibial and femoral pins positioned in the anterior, middle, and posterior parts of the attachment sites of the native superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and posterior oblique ligament (POL). Pins were also placed at the attachment sites relating to two commonly used medial reconstructions (Bosworth/Lind and LaPrade). Length changes between the tibiofemoral pin combinations were measured using a rotary encoder as the knee was flexed through an arc of 0–120°. Results With knee flexion, the anterior fibres of the sMCL tightened (increased in length 7.4% ± 2.9%) whilst the posterior fibres slackened (decreased in length 8.3% ± 3.1%). All fibre regions of the POL displayed a uniform lengthening of approximately 25% between 0 and 120° knee flexion. The most isometric tibiofemoral combination was between pins placed representing the middle fibres of the sMCL (Length change = 5.4% ± 2.1% with knee flexion). The simulated sMCL reconstruction that produced the least length change was the Lind/Bosworth reconstruction with the tibial attachment at the insertion of the semitendinosus and the femoral attachment in the posterior part of the native sMCL attachment side (5.4 ± 2.2%). This appeared more isometric than using the attachment positions described for the LaPrade reconstruction (10.0 ± 4.8%). Conclusion The complex behaviour of the native MCL could not be imitated by a single point-to-point combination and surgeons should be aware that small changes in the femoral MCL graft attachment position will significantly effect graft length change patterns. Reconstructing the sMCL with a semitendinosus autograft, left attached distally to its tibial insertion, would appear to have a minimal effect on length change compared to detaching it and using the native tibial attachment site. A POL graft must always be tensioned near extension to avoid capturing the knee or graft failure.

Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Ulnar Tunnel Position in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 3491-3497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascual H. Dutton ◽  
Michael B. Banffy ◽  
Trevor J. Nelson ◽  
Melodie F. Metzger
Keyword(s):  
Motion Tracking ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Joint Line ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Proximal Ulna ◽  
Tunnel Position ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Ulnar Tunnel

Background: Although numerous techniques of reconstruction of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) have been described, limited evidence exists on the biomechanical implication of changing the ulnar tunnel position despite the fact that more recent literature has clarified that the ulnar footprint extends more distally than was appreciated in the past. Purpose: To evaluate the size and location of the native ulnar footprint and assess valgus stability of the medial elbow after UCL reconstruction at 3 ulnar tunnel locations. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were dissected to expose the mUCL. The anatomic footprint of the ulnar attachment of the mUCL was measured with a digitizing probe. The area of the ulnar footprint and midpoint relative to the joint line were determined. Medial elbow stability was tested with the mUCL in an intact, deficient, and reconstructed state after the docking technique, with ulnar tunnels placed at 5, 10, or 15 mm from the ulnotrochlear joint line. A 3-N·m valgus torque was applied to the elbow, and valgus rotation of the ulna was recorded via motion-tracking cameras as the elbow was cycled through a full range of motion. After kinematic testing, specimens were loaded to failure at 70° of elbow flexion. Results: The mean ± SD length of the mUCL ulnar footprint was 27.4 ± 3.3 mm. The midpoint of the anatomic footprint was located between the 10- and 15-mm tunnels across all specimens at a mean 13.6 mm from the joint line. Sectioning of the mUCL increased elbow valgus rotation throughout all flexion angles and was statistically significant from 30° to 100° of flexion as compared with the intact elbow ( P < .05). mUCL reconstruction at all 3 tunnel locations restored stability to near intact levels with no significant differences among the 3 ulnar tunnel locations at any flexion angle. Conclusion: Positioning the ulnar graft fixation site up to 15 mm from the ulnotrochlear joint line does not significantly increase valgus rotation in the elbow. Clinical Relevance: A more distal ulnar tunnel may be a viable option to accommodate individual variation in morphology of the proximal ulna or in a revision setting.

scholarly journals Quantifying the Center of Elbow Rotation: Implications for Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kraig S. Graham ◽  
Sara Golla ◽  
Sebastian V. Gehrmann ◽  
Robert A. Kaufmann
Keyword(s):  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Drill Hole ◽  
Joint Line ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Rotation Center ◽  
Computed Tomography Scans ◽  
Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Consistent Location

Background: Medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction of the elbow mandates precise characterization of where the centerline of elbow rotation projects onto the medial epicondyle (ME). A muscle-splitting approach allows the flexor-pronator muscles to remain attached to the ME and facilitates visualization of the MCL remnant, the sublime tubercle, and the ulnohumeral joint line. Knowledge of where the centerline of rotation intersects the ME relative to the ulnohumeral joint line may assist the surgeon during placement of the proximal drill hole. Methods: Models were created from the computed tomography scans of 29 normal elbows. The centerline of rotation, center of the trochlea, sublime tubercle, and ulnohumeral joint line were identified. Measurements were taken from the ulnohumeral joint line to the center of the trochlea and to the centerline of rotation in the sagittal view and along the course of the MCL. Results: The centerline of rotation intersected the ME in a consistent location. With the elbow flexed 90°, the trochlea center and the centerline of rotation are essentially in line with each other. There are significant differences between the distances from the ulnohumeral joint line to the center of the trochlea and to the centerline of rotation in both the sagittal view and along the course of the MCL. Conclusions: The centerline of rotation is located 14.31 mm (1.70) from the ulnohumeral joint line in the sagittal view and 16.54 mm (2.09) from the ulnohumeral joint line along the course of the MCL.

scholarly journals Tibial Avulsion with Intra-Articular Entrapment of Medial Collateral Ligament with Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tear with Posterior Root Medial Meniscus Tear: A Case Report of an Unusual Injury Triad

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishan Shevate ◽  
Girish Nathani ◽  
Ashwin Deshmukh ◽  
Anirudh Kandari
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Joint Line ◽  
Posterior Root ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Valgus Stress ◽  
Medial Knee

Introduction: The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the most commonly injured ligament of the knee joint; however, its displacement into the medial knee compartment is rare. Traumatic posterior root of medial meniscus (PRMM) tears are commonly found in high-grade injuries involving anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears along with MCL tears. Diagnosis of these injuries can be made by a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but they can be missed at times due to severe soft-tissue swelling in the acute phase. Case Report: A 25-year-old gentleman presented with injury to the front of his left knee 5 days back. On examination, he had a Grade 3 effusion with valgus stress test and posterior drawer test being positive and medial joint line tenderness was present. A firm localized swelling was palpable on the medial joint line. MRI scan revealed a mid-substance PCL tear, ACL sprain, PRMM tear, and tibial side rupture of superficial MCL with proximally migrated wavy MCL fibers lying below the medial meniscus confirmed on arthroscopy. Medial meniscus root repair by pull through technique and PCL reconstruction with a 3-strand peroneus longus graft followed by open MCL repair with augmentation using a semitendinosus graft was performed. Postoperatively, the knee was kept in a straight knee brace for 4 weeks, followed by a hinged knee brace and appropriate physiotherapy were started. At 2 years follow-up, the patient had attained full range of knee motion with good quadriceps strength, tibial step off maintained, and negative posterior drawer test and valgus stress test. Displacement of torn MCL into the medial knee compartment is an extremely rare injury. Proximal or distal avulsion of MCL with intra-articular incarceration has been reported in isolation or associated with ACL tear. Such an injury triad as reported here has not been reported in the literature to the best of our review. Conclusion: In our case, we report a ver

scholarly journals In vivo length change of ligaments of normal knees during dynamic high flexion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Kono ◽  
Shoji Konda ◽  
Takaharu Yamazaki ◽  
Sakae Tanaka ◽  
Kazuomi Sugamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lateral Collateral Ligament ◽  
Length Change ◽  
3D Registration ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
High Flexion ◽  
Leg Motion

Abstract Background Few studies compared the length change of ligaments of normal knees during dynamic activities of daily living. The aim of this study was to investigate in vivo length change of ligaments of the normal knees during high flexion. Methods Eight normal knees were investigated. Each volunteer performed squatting, kneeling, and cross-leg motions. Each sequential motion was performed under fluoroscopic surveillance in the sagittal plane. The femoral, tibial, and fibular attachment areas of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL), superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL), and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) were determined according to osseous landmarks. After 2D/3D registration, the direct distance from the femoral attachment to the tibial or fibular attachment was measured as the ligament length. Results From 20° to 90° with flexion, the ACL was significantly shorter during cross-leg motion than during squatting. For the PCL, dMCL, sMCL, and LCL, there were no significant differences among the 3 motions. Conclusion The ACL was shorter during cross-leg motion than during squatting in mid-flexion. This suggests that the ACL is looser during cross-leg motion than during squatting. On the other hand, the length change of the PCL, MCL, and LCL did not change even though the high flexion motions were different.

scholarly journals In Vivo Length Change of Ligaments of Normal Knees During Dynamic High Flexion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Kono ◽  
Shoji Konda ◽  
Takaharu Yamazaki ◽  
Sakae Tanaka ◽  
Kazuomi Sugamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lateral Collateral Ligament ◽  
Length Change ◽  
3D Registration ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
High Flexion ◽  
Leg Motion

Abstract BackgroundNo studies compared the length change of ligaments of normal knees during dynamic activities of daily living. The aim of this study was to investigate in vivo length change of ligaments of the normal knees during high flexion.MethodsEight normal knees were investigated. Each volunteer performed squatting, kneeling, and cross-leg motions. Each sequential motion was performed under fluoroscopic surveillance in the sagittal plane. The femoral, tibial, and fibular attachment areas of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL), superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL), and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) were determined according to osseous landmarks. After 2D/3D registration, the direct distance from the femoral attachment to the tibial or fibular attachment was measured as the ligament length. ResultsFrom 20° to 90° withflexion, the ACL was significantly shorter during cross-leg motion than during squatting. For thePCL, dMCL, sMCL, and LCL, there were no significant differences among the 3 motions. ConclusionThe ACL was shorter during cross-leg motion than during squatting in mid-flexion. This suggests that the ACL is looser during cross-leg motion than during squatting. On the other hand, the length change of the PCL, MCL, and LCL did not change even though the high flexion motions were different.

scholarly journals Length change pattern of the medial structures of the knee and related reconstructions

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9_suppl7) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0053
Author(s):  
Arne Olbrich ◽  
Elmar Herbst ◽  
Christoph Domnick ◽  
Johannes Glasbrenner ◽  
Michael J. Raschke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Length Change ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Femoral Insertion ◽  
Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Length Changes ◽  
Length Reduction

Introduction: Aim of the study was to investigate the length changes of the medial structures and related reconstructions. It was assumed that the three fibre sections (anterior/middle/posterior) of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) have different length change patterns, which cannot be imitated by current reconstructions. Hypotheses: The three fibre sections (anterior/middle/posterior) of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) cannot be imitated by current reconstructions. Methods: Measurements were made on eight cadaveric knees. The knee joints were clamped in a custom-made open chain extension structure. For this purpose, the portions of the quadriceps and the iliotibial tract were aligned according to their fibre direction and statically loaded using hanging weights. The respective tibial and femoral insertion points of the sMCL anterior/middle/posterior fibres were marked by small pins. Similarly, pins were inserted at the tibial and femoral attachment sites of the posterior oblique ligament (POL). In order to imitate the Lind reconstruction, a pin was additionally inserted on the tibial semitendinosus insertion site. Pin combinations accounting for the anterior/middle/posterior sMCL, the POL, and the Lind reconstruction were connected using a high resistant suture. Then the length change patterns were measured using a rotary encoder from 0-120° knee flexion. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA and a post-hoc Bonferroni correction (p <0.05). Results: The anterior and posterior fibres of the sMCL showed a reciprocal behaviour (p< 0.001). The anterior fibres showed a length reduction (2%) up to a flexion of 20°, followed by an elongation of 5% at 120° flexion, which means that the anterior fibres are tight in knee flexion. Conversely, the posterior fibres of the MCL showed an initial length reduction of 4% at 20° flexion. This was followed by an isometric range (20° - 80°) and a further length reduction of 8% in deep flexion (120°). Thus, the posterior fibres of the MCL were tight in extension. The three parts of the POL showed a constant reduction of 25% between 0° and 120°. The Lind reconstruction with the tibial pin at the semitendinosus insertion site showed similar length changes compared to the sMCL (n.s.). Furthermore, the Lind reconstruction was dependent on the femoral placement of the pins (p <.001). The tibial placement had no significant influence. Conclusion: The anterior portion of the sMCL was tight in flexion, whereas the posterior portion was tight in extension. This reciprocal behavior could not be imitated by a single point to point reconstruction. When surgically applying these reconstructions, special attention should be paid to the femoral insertion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document