Maintaining good research practice: Research integrity in the UK

Maturitas ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-240
Author(s):  
James Parry
Keyword(s):  
Research Integrity ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Good Research

scholarly journals Open, transparent and honest – the way we practice research

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Bertil Fabricius Dorch
Keyword(s):  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Research Integrity ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Responsible Conduct Of Research ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Responsible Conduct ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
Good Research

<p>This paper makes the case for Open Science as a means to support and practice Responsible Conduct of Research. Responsible and ethical research practices imply research integrity in terms of transparency, honesty and accountability in all parts of research, being it when attaining funding for research, collecting and analyzing research data, collaborating on research, performing scholarly communication, e.g. authoring and disseminating research etc. Likewise, the topics normally associated with Open Science directly support responsible conduct and in fact, one can argue that Open Science is a ubiquitous prerequisite for good research practice.</p>

Scientists’ Conceptions of Good Research Practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 766-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Hangel ◽  
Jutta Schickore
Keyword(s):  
Research Practice ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
Good Research

Definitions of Fraud and Misconduct Revisited

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Göran Hermerén
Keyword(s):  
Research Community ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
Good Research

AbstractDefinitions of fraud and misconduct are not ethically neutral, and they have implications for the process and procedure of investigations into cases of suspected fraud and misconduct. The aim of this paper is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of some current definitions of fraud and misconduct, including disjunctive and parallel sets of definitions. Possible purposes of these definitions are explained. Since intention to deceive is difficult to prove, and word often stands against word, allegations may be difficult or impossible to substantiate. If the accused person is not proven guilty, this may be perceived as a signal to the research community that the accused was innocent - even though the work by the accused author contains many serious deviations from good research practice. It turns out that several distinctions need to be made between different kinds of fraud and misconduct, and that these have implications for how best to deal way with suspected scientific dishonesty.

Is Reflexivity Enough? Addressing Reflexive Embodiment, Power, and Whiteness in Sport Management Research

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-43
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Vadeboncoeur ◽  
Trevor Bopp ◽  
John N. Singer
Keyword(s):  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Sport Management ◽  
Ways Of Knowing ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Management Research ◽  
Psychology Education ◽  
Explicit Consideration ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
Methodological Considerations ◽  
Good Research

In this article, the authors drew from the epistemological and methodological considerations of neighboring social science fields (i.e., counseling psychology, education, sociology, and women’s studies), which suggest a reevaluation of reflexive research practice(s). In discussing the implications this reevaluation may have for future sport management research, the authors contend that such dialogue may encourage scholars to understand that, while adopting a reflexive approach is good research practice, it may also mean taking a closer look at how our biases, epistemologies, identities, and values are shaped by whiteness and dominant ways of knowing and, in turn, serve to affect our research practice. Thus, this may allow all researchers, with explicit consideration for those in positions of conceptual, empirical, and methodological, as well as cultural and racial, power, to acknowledge and work toward a more meaningful point of consciousness in conducting sport management research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document