Relationships between different evaluation techniques in lower medial longitudinal arch subjects

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. e133
Author(s):  
A. Gomez-Conesa ◽  
J.C. Zuil-Escobar ◽  
C. Martínez-Cepa ◽  
J.A. Martín-Urrialde
Keyword(s):  
Medial Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Evaluation Techniques

scholarly journals Is subtalar extra articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) reducing pain and restoring medial longitudinal arch in children with flexible flat foot?

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 147-153
Author(s):  
Mohammed Elmarghany ◽  
Tarek M. Abd El-Ghaffar ◽  
Ahmed Elgeushy ◽  
Ehab Elzahed ◽  
Yehia Hasanin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Flat Foot ◽  
Longitudinal Arch

scholarly journals Windlass Mechanism in Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus, Peripheral Neuropathy, and Low Medial Longitudinal Arch Height

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 816-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith R. Gelber ◽  
David R. Sinacore ◽  
Michael J. Strube ◽  
Michael J. Mueller ◽  
Jeffrey E. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Medial Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Arch Height ◽  
Longitudinal Arch

scholarly journals Medial Longitudinal Arch: Accuracy, Reliability, and Correlation Between Navicular Drop Test and Footprint Parameters

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 672-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Zuil-Escobar ◽  
Carmen Belén Martínez-Cepa ◽  
Jose Antonio Martín-Urrialde ◽  
Antonia Gómez-Conesa
Keyword(s):  
Drop Test ◽  
Medial Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Navicular Drop ◽  
Longitudinal Arch

scholarly journals Does the weakening of intrinsic foot muscles cause the decrease of medial longitudinal arch height?

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1001-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunori Okamura ◽  
Shusaku Kanai ◽  
Sadaaki Oki ◽  
Satoshi Tanaka ◽  
Naohisa Hirata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Arch Height ◽  
Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Intrinsic Foot Muscles

Assessment of the medial longitudinal arch in children and adolescents with obesity: footprints and radiographic study

2008 ◽  
Vol 168 (5) ◽  
pp. 559-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Adoración Villarroya ◽  
J. Manuel Esquivel ◽  
Concepción Tomás ◽  
Luis A. Moreno ◽  
Ana Buenafé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Medial Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Radiographic Study ◽  
Longitudinal Arch

scholarly journals Effect of Isometric Hip Abduction on Foot and Ankle Muscle Activity and Medial Longitudinal Arch During Short-Foot Exercise in Individuals With Pes Planus

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Jung-Hoon Choi ◽  
Heon-Seock Cynn ◽  
Chung-Hwi Yi ◽  
Tae-Lim Yoon ◽  
Seung-Min Baik
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Standing Position ◽  
Medial Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Joint Stability ◽  
Abductor Hallucis ◽  
Pes Planus ◽  
Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hip Abduction

Context: The improvement of hip joint stability can significantly impact knee and rearfoot mechanics. Individuals with pes planus have a weak abductor hallucis (AbdH), and the tibialis anterior (TA) may activate to compensate for this. As yet, no studies have applied isometric hip abduction (IHA) for hip stability during short-foot exercise (SFE). Objective: To compare the effects of IHA on the muscle activity of the AbdH, TA, peroneus longus (PL), and gluteus medius (Gmed), as well as the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) angle during sitting and standing SFE. Design: Two-way repeated analyses of variance were used to determine the statistical significance of AbdH, TA, PL, and Gmed electromyography activity, as well as the change in MLA angle. Setting: University research laboratory. Participants: Thirty-two participants with pes planus. Intervention(s): The participants performed SFE with and without isometric hip abduction in sitting and standing positions. Main Outcome Measures: Surface electromyography was used to measure the activity of the AbdH, TA, PL, and Gmed muscles, and Image J was used to measure the MLA angle. Results: Significant interactions between exercise type and position were observed in terms of the PL muscle activity and in the change in MLA angle only, while other muscles showed significant main effects. The IHA during SFE significantly increased the AbdH muscle activity, while the TA muscle activity was significantly lower. The muscle activity of Gmed and PL was significantly increased in the standing position compared with sitting, but there was no significant difference with or without IHA. The change in the MLA angle was significantly greater in SFE with IHA in a standing position than in the other SFE conditions. Conclusions: IHA may be an effective method for reducing compensatory TA activity and increasing AbdH muscle activity during SFE for individuals with pes planus.

scholarly journals MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF PLANTAR ARCH INDEX AND THE PREVALENCE OF FLATFOOT AMONG TRIBES

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4.1) ◽  
pp. 7782-7787
Author(s):  
Adjei-Antwi Collins ◽  
◽  
Chrissie Stansie Abaidoo ◽  
Nketsiah James ◽  
Joshua Tetteh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prevalence Rate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Morphometric Study ◽  
Medial Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Foot Deformity ◽  
Pes Planus ◽  
Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Foot Arch ◽  
Arch Index

Flatfoot (pes planus), commonest foot deformity caused by the absence or collapse of the medial longitudinal arch. Flatfoot results in serious health problems and postural defects. It is highly variable in different populations with many factors associated. This study was conducted to find the plantar arch index and the prevalence of flatfoot and its relationship with tribes in Ghana. A total of 278 participants (172 males and 106 females) with ages ranging from 16 to 34 years were recruited for the study. Ethical approval and participants’ informed consent were sought prior to the study. Participants were drawn from the Akan, Ewe, Ga-Dangbe and other tribes (Dagomba, Dagabaa, Frafra, Gonja, Wale Wale etc). Foot imprints were taken from each participant using the ink method. The plantar arch index was calculated using the ratio of the width of the central and the heel region of the footprint. The mean right plantar arch index was higher than the left. The prevalence of flatfoot was 15.1% (6.1% unilateral left, 5.8% unilateral right and 3.2% bilateral). The prevalence rate was 15.7% in males and 14.1% in females. The prevalence rates reported for the Ga-Dangbes and Ewes were 30.8% and 23.6% respectively. On the other hand, both Akans and individuals belonging to the other tribes recorded the same prevalence rate of 13.7%. Flatfoot was found to be high among the Ga-Dangbes. Ethnicity as an external factor has a great role in influencing foot arch structure. Also, sex has an influence on the morphology of an individual’s foot. KEY WORDS: Flatfoot, Pes planus, Foot deformity, Medial Longitudinal Arch.

scholarly journals Dynamic Pedobarography Shows Pain Avoidance Gait of Symptomatic Severe Flatfoot Patient

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0001
Author(s):  
Woo-Chun Lee ◽  
Chihoon Ahn ◽  
Ji-Beom Kim ◽  
Mu Hyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Plantar Pressure ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Metatarsal Head ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Medial Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Head Elevation ◽  
Radiographic Parameters ◽  
Longitudinal Arch ◽  
Bearing Load ◽  
The Mean

Category: Basic Sciences/Biologics, Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: In the flatfoot patients, collapsed medial longitudinal arch during gait induced pain and it results decreased center of progression excursion index(CPEI) in dynamic pedobarography. Although the CPEI decreased is pathologic gait of flatfoot patients, range of the CPEIs is wide even in similar severity of flatfoot patients. We hypothesized that some flatfoot patients inverted forefoot or elevated first metatarsal head during gait for avoiding the pain from collapsed medial longitudinal arch, which resulted wide range of the CPEIs in flatfoot patients. The purposes of this study were to investigate the incidence of forefoot inversion and 1st metatarsal head elevation during gait in severe symptomatic flatfoot patients, and to confirm whether forefoot inversion and 1st metatarsal head elevation increases the CPEI, by using the dynamic pedobarography. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent surgery for flatfoot in our clinic from January, 2017 to May, 2017. Before surgery, all patients underwent plain weight-bearing radiographs and dynamic pedobarography by using in-shoe plantar pressure assessment system (Tekscan, Inc., South Boston, MA). Radiographic parameters, talonavicular coverage angle, Meary angle and moment arm, and the CPEI in dynamic pedobarogrpahy were measured. The forefoot inversion and the 1st metatarsal head elevation were defined when sum of 3rd-4th and 5th submetatarsal plantar pressure was higher than sum of 1st and 2nd submetatarsal plantar pressure, and when 2nd submetatarsal plantar pressure was higher than 1st submetatarsal plantar pressure, respectively. Correlations between the radiographic parameters and the CPEI were investigated. Incidence of the forefoot inversion and the 1st metatarsal head elevation was investigated. The CPEIs in flatfeet with forefoot inversion or 1st metatarsal head elevation were compared with those in flatfeet without these pain avoidance gait. Results: Twenty-eight flatfeet from 28 patients were included in the present study. The average age of patients was 42.3 years (range: 19-71). Means of the three radiographic parameters and the CPEI of the 28 flatfeet were listed at table.1. There was no significant correlation between the CPEI and the three radiographic parameters.(Table.2) The incidence of forefoot inversion and 1st metatarsal head elevation were 11%(3 feet), 54%(15 feet) respectively. The mean CPEI of the flatfeet with forefoot inversion or 1st metatarsal head elevation was 8(range: -10 – 18), and the mean CPEI of the flatfeet without these two compensations was 5 (range: -3 – 12). The CPEI in the flatfeet with the two compensations was significant larger than that of the flatfeet without the two compensations. (P=0.027) Conclusion: In the present study, forefoot inversion or 1st metatarsal head elevation were happened in 65% of symptomatic flatfoot patients. These two pain avoidance gait shifts weight-bearing load laterally, which decreases collapsing medial longitudinal arch and pain on the flatfoot. Because lateral shifting of weight-bearing load increases the CPEI, flatfoot patients with these two gaits showed high the CPEI. Therefore, the degree of the CPEIs are various even in similar severity of flatfoot and are not correlated with the severity of the flatfoot. Clinicians should consider these pain avoidance gait of flatfoot patients when they interpret a dynamic pedobarography of flatfoot.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document