The predictive validity of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire and the clinicians' prognostic assessment following manual therapy treatment of patients with LBP and neck pain

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Dagfinrud ◽  
K. Storheim ◽  
L.H. Magnussen ◽  
T. Ødegaard ◽  
I. Hoftaniska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Prognostic Assessment ◽  
Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Therapy Treatment

Cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in acute and subacute neck pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Şule Şimşek ◽  
Nesrin Yağcı ◽  
Hande Şenol
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Fear Avoidance ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background/aims The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire is categorised as a ‘yellow flag’ pain-associated psychological distress screening tool, which predicts long-term disability. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in patients with acute and subacute neck pain. Methods The test–retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α. Construct validity was assessed with a visual analogue scale, the Neck Disability Index and the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire. Results Cronbach's α value was found to be 0.790, test–retest reliability was 0.99. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.999 (95% confidence interval: 0.998–0.999; P=0.000). The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire showed a moderate positive correlation with the Neck Disability Index (r=0.544; P=0.0001), a weak correlation with the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (r=0.264; P=0.0001) but no correlation with the visual analogue scale. Conclusions The Turkish version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire is a valid, reliable and acceptable screening tool in patients with acute and subacute neck pain.

Expectations of recovery: A prognostic factor in patients with neck pain undergoing manual therapy treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1384-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Palmlöf ◽  
L. W. Holm ◽  
L. Alfredsson ◽  
E. Skillgate
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Therapy Treatment

scholarly journals Accuracy of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire and Work Assessment Triage Tool for selecting interventions in workers with spinal conditions

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Eloi Gergelé ◽  
Eric Parent ◽  
Douglas P. Gross
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Injured Workers ◽  
Predictive Tool ◽  
Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Work Assessment ◽  
Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Accurate clinical decision support tools may help clinicians select appropriate interventions for patients with spinal conditions. The Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (OMPQ) is a screening questionnaire extensively studied as a predictive tool. The Work Assessment Triage Tool (WATT) is a clinical decision support tool developed to help select interventions for injured workers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the classification accuracy of the OMPQ and WATT to clinician recommendations for selecting interventions leading to a successful return to work in patients with spinal conditions. METHODS: A secondary analysis was undertaken of data from injured workers with spinal conditions assessed between 2013 and 2016. We considered it a success if the workers did not receive wage replacement benefits 30 days after assessment. Analysis included positive likelihood ratio (LR+) as an indicator of predictive accuracy. RESULTS: Within the database, 2,872 patients had complete data on the OMPQ, WATT, and clinician recommendations. At 30 days, the OMPQ was most accurate for identifying treatments that lead to successful outcomes with a LR+= 1.51 (95% Confidence Interval 1.26–1.82) compared to 1.05 (95% Confidence Interval 1.02–1.09) for clinicians, and 0.85 (95% Confidence Interval 0.79–0.91) for the WATT. CONCLUSIONS: All tool recommendations had poor accuracy, however the OMPQ demonstrated significantly better results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document