scholarly journals Prediction of forming limit in DP590 steel sheet forming: An extended fracture criterion

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bolin Ma ◽  
Z.G. Liu ◽  
Zheng Jiang ◽  
Xiangdong Wu ◽  
Keshan Diao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steel Sheet ◽  
Fracture Criterion ◽  
Sheet Forming ◽  
Forming Limit

Fracture Prediction for Sheet Metals Subjected to Draw-Bending Using Forming Limit Stress Criterion

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masazumi Saito ◽  
Toshihiko Kuwabara
Keyword(s):  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Steel Sheet ◽  
Fracture Criterion ◽  
Test Material ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Sheet Metals ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Stress Criterion ◽  
Limit Stress ◽  
Draw Bending

Draw-bending is one of the typical deformation modes in sheet metal forming. It causes serious thickness reduction to sheet metals and very often leads to fracture. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a fracture criterion for sheet metals subjected to draw-bending. In this study, a fracture criterion for sheet metals subjected to draw-bending is investigated using the concept of the forming limit stress criterion. The test material used is a dual phase steel sheet (DP590Y) with a thickness of 1.2 mm and a tensile strength of 590 MPa. Draw-bending experiments of a wide specimen are performed using three different die profile radii: 4, 6 and 10 mm. The forming limit stress of the test material under draw-bending, σDB, is precisely determined from the experimentally measured drawing force and the cross sectional area of the specimen, determined from the strain distribution in the vicinity of fracture using a 2 mm square grid. In addition, multiaxial tube expansion tests are performed to measure the forming limit stress under plane strain tension, σPT. It is found that σDB almost coincides with σPT. Thus, it is concluded that σPT can be a fracture criterion for a sheet metal under draw-bending, at least for the high strength steel sheet used in this study.

Fracture Prediction for Ultralow Carbon Steel Sheet Subjected to Draw-Bending Using Forming Limit Stress Criterion

2015 ◽  
Vol 665 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Chiharu Sekiguchi ◽  
Masazumi Saito ◽  
Toshihiko Kuwabara ◽  
Hiroshi Fukiharu
Keyword(s):  
Steel Sheet ◽  
Fracture Criterion ◽  
Test Material ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Stress Criterion ◽  
Die Profile ◽  
Limit Stress ◽  
Draw Bending ◽  
Ultralow Carbon ◽  
Carbon Steel Sheet

A fracture criterion for sheet metals subjected to draw-bending is investigated using the concept of forming limit stress criterion. The test material used is a 1.0-mm-thick ultralow carbon steel sheet. Draw-bending experiment of a wide specimen is performed for a die profile radius of 4mm. A specimen undergoes bending-unbending under tension when passing over the die profile radius. The drawing speed was set to 5mm/s. The magnitude of true stress when a specimen fractured has been precisely determined from the measured data of a drawing force and the cross sectional area of the draw-bent specimen after fracture. Moreover, multiaxial tube expansion tests of the test material are performed to measure the forming limit stress of the test material under plane strain tension. It is found that the is larger than by approximately 10 %. Therefore, it is concluded that the forming limit stress criterion is effective as a fracture criterion for a mild steel sheet subjected to draw-bending.

Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Forming Limits in CNC Incremental Sheet Forming

2007 ◽  
Vol 344 ◽  
pp. 511-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Bambach ◽  
M. Todorova ◽  
Gerhard Hirt
Keyword(s):  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Sheet Forming ◽  
Incremental Sheet Forming ◽  
Negative Slope ◽  
Evaluation Procedure ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Limit Curve ◽  
Forming Limit Curve ◽  
Forming Limits ◽  
Straight Line

Asymmetric incremental sheet forming (AISF) is a relatively new manufacturing process for the production of low volumes of sheet metal parts. Forming is accomplished by the CNC controlled movements of a simple ball-headed tool that follows a 3D trajectory to gradually shape the sheet metal blank. Due to the local plastic deformation under the tool, there is almost no draw-in from the flange region to avoid thinning in the forming zone. As a consequence, sheet thinning limits the amount of bearable deformation, and thus the range of possible applications. Much attention has been given to the maximum strains that can be attained in AISF. Several authors have found that the forming limits are considerably higher than those obtained using a Nakazima test and that the forming limit curve is approximately a straight line (mostly having a slope of -1) in the stretching region of the FLD. Based on these findings they conclude that the “conventional” forming limit curves cannot be used for AISF and propose dedicated tests to record forming limit diagrams for AISF. Up to now, there is no standardised test and no evaluation procedure for the determination of FLCs for AISF. In the present paper, we start with an analysis of the range of strain states and strain paths that are covered by the various tests that can be found in the literature. This is accomplished by means of on-line deformation measurements using a stereovision system. From these measurements, necking and fracture limits are derived. It is found that the fracture limits can be described consistently by a straight line with negative slope. The necking limits seem to be highly dependent on the test shapes and forming parameters. It is concluded that standardisation in both testing conditions and the evaluation procedures is necessary, and that a forming limit curve does not seem to be an appropriate tool to predict the feasibility of a given part design.

scholarly journals Forming Limit Research of 5182 Aluminum Alloy Sheet Based on Lou-2013 Ductile Fracture Criterion

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (16) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
YANG Zhuoyun ◽  
ZHAO Changcai ◽  
DONG Guojiang ◽  
CHEN Guang ◽  
ZHU Liangjin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aluminum Alloy ◽  
Ductile Fracture ◽  
Fracture Criterion ◽  
Alloy Sheet ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Aluminum Alloy Sheet ◽  
Ductile Fracture Criterion

Burring Process and Fracture Criterion of Large Diameter Steel Pipe

2020 ◽  
Vol 846 ◽  
pp. 139-145
Author(s):  
Shinichi Nishida ◽  
Daichi Uematsu ◽  
Naoki Ikeda ◽  
Kyohei Ogawa ◽  
Makoto Hagiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Fracture Criterion ◽  
Maximum Shear Stress ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Branch Pipe ◽  
Fem Analysis ◽  
Equivalent Strain ◽  
Steel Pipe ◽  
Experimental Result ◽  
Forming Limit

This paper describes finite element method analysis (FEM analysis), results of burring processing of large diameter steel pipe and fracture criterion in burring process of large diameter steel pipe. In this study, the pipe is the 150A SGP pipe with a diameter of 165.2 mm and a wall thickness of 5 mm. The pipe is used for a plant as a flow channel of gas and liquid. A burring process of pipe is generally for forming the branch. The burring process is achieved by drawing of die from prepared hole. And the branch pipe is welded to the formed pipe. This process has some problem. One is the forming limit of pipe, and the other is needed to machining the end surface to be welded. Therefore, in this study, the forming limit of SGP pipe was estimated by FEM analysis of burring process. The parameters used for criteria for forming limit are the maximum shear stress and the equivalent strain. As a result of comparing the analysis result and the experimental result, the forming limit of the 150A SGP pipe was estimated that the maximum shear stress is 350 MPa and the equivalent strain is around 0.8.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document