scholarly journals Treatment Results and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Patients With Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. e51-e52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Balderman ◽  
Ahmmad Abuirqeba ◽  
Cassandra Pate ◽  
Lindsay Eichaker ◽  
Jeanne Earley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Outcomes Measures ◽  
Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures: An Introduction for Clinicians

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Yorkston ◽  
Carolyn Baylor
Keyword(s):  
Instrument Development ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Communication Disorders ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Outcomes Measures ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Tools

Patient-reported outcome measures contain information that comes directly from the patient without interpretation by anyone else. These measures are an important part of a clinicians' arsenal of assessment approaches and are critical in the development of patient-centered approaches to intervention. In this introduction to patient-reported outcome measurement tools, a history is provided of this approach to measurement and its place within the context of clinical research and practice. The process of instrument development and application will be reviewed, along with examples of measurement tools from the field of neurological communication disorders. This introduction is supplemented by references that provide interested readers with more detailed information.

scholarly journals Effect of Social Support and Marital Status on Perceived Surgical Effectiveness and 30-Day Hospital Readmission

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 774-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owoicho Adogwa ◽  
Aladine A. Elsamadicy ◽  
Victoria D. Vuong ◽  
Ankit I. Mehta ◽  
Raul A. Vasquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Marital Status ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Outcomes Measures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

Study Design: Retrospective cohort review. Objective: To determine whether higher levels of social support are associated with improved surgical outcomes after elective spine surgery. Methods: The medical records of 430 patients (married, n = 313; divorced/separated/widowed, n = 71; single, n = 46) undergoing elective spine surgery at a major academic medical center were reviewed. Patients were categorized by their marital status at the time of surgery. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complication rates were collected. All patients had prospectively collected outcomes measures and a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Patient reported outcomes instruments (Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form–36, and visual analog scale–back pain/leg pain) were completed before surgery, then at 1 year after surgery. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in all cohorts. There was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay across all 3 cohorts, although “single patients” had longer duration of in-hospital stays that trended toward significance (single 6.24 days vs married 4.53 days vs divorced/separated/widowed 4.55 days, P = .05). Thirty-day readmission rates were similar across all cohorts (married 7.03% vs divorced/separated/widowed 7.04% vs single 6.52%, P = .99). Additionally, there were no significant differences in baseline and 1-year patient reported outcomes measures between all groups. Conclusions: Increased social support did not appear to be associated with superior short and long-term clinical outcomes after spine surgery; however, it was associated with a shorter duration of in-hospital stay with no increase in 30-day readmission rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document