scholarly journals Abdominal Compartment Syndrome After Surgery for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Nationwide Population Based Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 830
Author(s):  
S. Ersryd ◽  
K. Djavani-Gidlund ◽  
A. Wanhainen ◽  
M. Björck
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Abdominal Compartment

How to identify patients at risk of abdominal compartment syndrome after surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the operating room: A pilot study

Vascular ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 472-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty Leclerc ◽  
Lucie Salomon Du Mont ◽  
Guillaume Besch ◽  
Simon Rinckenbach
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Abdominal Compartment

Objectives Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is poorly identified in surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and an early management is crucial. The aim of this study was to validate how many risk factors were needed to predict ACS. Secondary objectives were to assess its prevalence and the 30-day mortality. Methods All patients operated for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm during 5 years were included. An independent committee performed a retrospective diagnosis of ACS. Eight criteria were selected from the literature, and corresponded to pre- and intraoperative period: anemia (hemoglobin lower than 10 g/dL), prolonged shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg more than 18 min), preoperative cardiac arrest, obesity (body mass index > 30), massive fluid resuscitation (≥3500 mL per hour for at least 1 h) and transfusions (>10 units packed blood red cell since the beginning of the treatment), severe hypothermia (≤33℃), acidosis (pH < 7.2). Sensitivity and specificity were assessed for each number of criteria. Results Eight patients were ACS+ and 28 ACS-, with three criteria for ACS+ and 1.5 for ACS- ( p = 0.002). Three criteria among the eight selected criteria have the best cutoff for sensitivity and specificity (75% and 82%) with a positive predictive value of 54% and a negative predictive value of 92%. The prevalence of ACS was 17%. The 30-day mortality in ACS+ tended to be higher than in ACS- ( p = 0.108). Conclusion The present results suggest that patients with an ACS seemed to have higher mortality and the threshold of three factors among eight specific factors is enough to predict this.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document