scholarly journals Predictive ability of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system following infrapopliteal endovascular interventions for critical limb ischemia

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 616-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy D. Darling ◽  
John C. McCallum ◽  
Peter A. Soden ◽  
Yifan Meng ◽  
Mark C. Wyers ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-108.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip P. Goodney ◽  
Andres Schanzer ◽  
Randall R. DeMartino ◽  
Brian W. Nolan ◽  
Nathanael D. Hevelone ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Trocciola ◽  
Rabih Chaer ◽  
Rajeev Dayal ◽  
Stephanie C. Lin ◽  
Naveen Kumar ◽  
...  

This study analyzed clinical success, patency, and limb salvage after endovascular repair in patients treated for chronic limb ischemia presenting with claudication versus critical limb ischemia. Between October 2001 and August 2004, 115 patients (mean age 71) underwent endovascular treatment for infrainguinal arterial disease. Techniques included subintimal angioplasty and transluminal angioplasty with or without stents. Lesions were classified according to Transatlantic InterSociety Consensus. Follow-up (mean 11 months) included physical exam, ankle-brachial index, and duplex ultrasound. Patency rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier and compared by log-rank analysis. One hundred ninety-nine lesions were treated in 121 limbs using percutaneous techniques. Comorbidities were similar except higher rates of diabetes mellitus (67% vs 41%, P < 0.001) and chronic renal insufficiency (22% vs 7%, P < 0.05) were found in critical limb ischemia patients. Primary patency for claudicants was 100 per cent, 98 per cent, and 85 per cent at 3, 6, and 12 months and 89 per cent, 80 per cent, and 72 per cent for critical limb ischemia, respectively ( P = 0.06). Limb salvage was 91 per cent at 12 months for critical limb ischemia patients. Morbidity was similar between groups, and there was no perioperative mortality. Percutaneous intervention for both claudication and critical limb ischemia provides acceptable 12-month patency with limited morbidity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Troisi ◽  
Filippo Turini ◽  
Emiliano Chisci ◽  
Leonardo Ercolini ◽  
Pierfrancesco Frosini ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin W Hicks ◽  
Alireza Najafian ◽  
Alik Farber ◽  
Matthew T Menard ◽  
Mahmoud B Malas ◽  
...  

Both open surgery and endovascular peripheral interventions have been shown to effectively improve outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease, but minimal data exist comparing outcomes performed at and below the knee. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes following infrageniculate lower extremity open bypass (LEB) versus peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in patients with critical limb ischemia. Using data from the 2008–2014 Vascular Quality Initiative, 1-year primary patency, major amputation, and mortality were compared among all patients undergoing LEB versus PVI at or below the knee for rest pain or tissue loss. Overall, 2566 patients were included (LEB=500, PVI=2066). One-year primary patency was significantly worse following LEB (73% vs 81%; p<0.001). One-year major amputation (14% vs 12%; p=0.18) and mortality (4% vs 6%; p=0.15) were similar regardless of revascularization approach. Multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline differences between groups confirmed inferior primary patency following LEB versus PVI (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60–0.90; p=0.004), but no significant differences in 1-year major amputation (HR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.80–1.40; p=0.67) or mortality (HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.44–1.14; p=0.16). Based on these data, we conclude that endovascular revascularization is a viable treatment approach for critical limb ischemia resulting from infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 164-168
Author(s):  
K N Movchan ◽  
V K Suhov ◽  
B S Artyushin ◽  
E A Shlojdo ◽  
V V Shlomin ◽  
...  

General information about the activity of specialists of the regional vascular centers of St. Petersburg in 2011-2015 is presented. and on the private results of the work of the staff of the center of one of the city’s multidisciplinary hospitals with an assessment of the data on the cases of treatment of 403 patients with critical limb ischemia against the background of arterial lesions of atherosclerosis. Four groups of patients were identified: 278 patients who underwent open reconstruction of the arteries of the lower extremities; 51, who underwent endovascular revascularization; 15, who underwent hybrid surgical interventions. Revascularization was not performed in 55 patients. Among the open operations, loop endarterectomy from the aortoiliac and femoral-popliteal segments (190) and shunting arterial reconstructions (45) prevailed. In endovascular interventions, femoral-popliteal-tibial segments were predominantly corrected - 37 cases. Hybrid operations in 100% of cases are performed through accesses through the femoral arteries. In case of refusal of reconstruction due to the absence of an anatomic substrate for the reconstruction of the vessels, primary amputation of the lower limb (15), lumbar sympathectomy (14) were performed. In 30 cases, angiotropic therapy was performed. Complications of open surgical interventions in the early postoperative period were revealed in 21,6%, endovascular - in 15% of cases, hybrid operations were noted in 13,3% (in total91 complications in 70 patients). Thrombosis of the vascular reconstruction area (35%) and inadequacy of perfusion of limb tissues in permeable vessels (19,7%) prevailed in the structure of complications. There were no lethal outcomes. In general, the use of endovascular and hybrid reconstructions of the vascular bed in specialized divisions of medical organizations in patients with critical limb ischemia with multifocal atherosclerosis contributes to a significant reduction in the frequency of negative consequences of surgical revascularization of the lower extremities.


2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 244-253.e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abd Moain Abu Dabrh ◽  
Mark W. Steffen ◽  
Noor Asi ◽  
Chaitanya Undavalli ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document