scholarly journals Regarding “Cost-effectiveness analysis of elective endovascular repair compared with open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms for patients at a high surgical risk: A 1-year patient-level analysis conducted in Ontario, Canada”

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosmas I. Paraskevas
Author(s):  
Ernesto Arenas Azofra ◽  
Cristóbal Iglesias Iglesias ◽  
Carmen González Canga ◽  
Francisco Álvarez Marcos ◽  
Carlota Fernández Prendes ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 20S-21S
Author(s):  
Maxime Raux ◽  
Virendra I. Patel ◽  
Frederic Cochennec ◽  
Shankha Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Pascal Desgranges ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 175045892094735
Author(s):  
Harry Kyriacou ◽  
Ahmed M H A M Mostafa ◽  
Anoop S Sumal ◽  
Holly N Hellawell ◽  
Jonathan R Boyle

Large, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are usually treated surgically if patients are deemed fit enough. This may be achieved through endovascular or open surgical repair. The type of treatment that a patient receives is dependant on many factors, such as the rupture status of the aneurysm. Each approach is also associated with different risks and postoperative complications. Multiple guidelines exist to inform the surgical management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. This literature review combines these recommendations and explores the evidence upon which they are based. In addition, it highlights the key perioperative considerations that need to be considered in cases of unruptured and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document