scholarly journals Systematic Review Of Studies Estimating The Cost-Effectiveness Of Hiv Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (Prep) In Men Who Have Sex With Men (Msm)

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A417
Author(s):  
O Damm ◽  
S Scholz ◽  
W Greiner
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
The Cost

Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of a Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Program for HIV Prevention for Men Who Have Sex with Men in Japan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nao Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshiki Koizumi ◽  
Shinya Tsuzuki ◽  
Keisuke Ejima ◽  
Misao Takano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Hiv Prevention ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
The Cost

scholarly journals The Cost and Impact of Scaling Up Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention: A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Modelling Studies

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e1001401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela B. Gomez ◽  
Annick Borquez ◽  
Kelsey K. Case ◽  
Ana Wheelock ◽  
Anna Vassall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Hiv Prevention ◽  
Scaling Up ◽  
Modelling Studies ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
The Cost

scholarly journals The cost-effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men and transgender women at high risk of HIV infection in Brazil

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. e25096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula M Luz ◽  
Benjamin Osher ◽  
Beatriz Grinsztejn ◽  
Rachel L Maclean ◽  
Elena Losina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Transgender Women ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
The Cost

scholarly journals Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in a Sample of Italian Men Who Have SEX with MEN (MSM)

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4772
Author(s):  
Gianluca Voglino ◽  
Maria Rosaria Gualano ◽  
Stefano Rousset ◽  
Pietro Forghieri ◽  
Isabella Fraire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Immune Deficiency Syndrome ◽  
Deficiency Syndrome ◽  
Attitudes And Practices ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Prep Awareness ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Knowledge Attitudes And Practices

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is suitable for high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infection risk people, foremost among whom are males who have sex with other males (MSM). This study evaluated knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding PrEP in a sample of Italian MSM, in order to hypothesize strategies to implement PrEP awareness and use. No previous study has assessed this issue; Methods: An online survey was given to an opportunistic sample of Italian MSM. The questionnaire investigated sexual behaviour and habits, HIV/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) knowledge and PrEP awareness, attitudes and practices. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to identify factors associated with PrEP knowledge; Results: A total of 196 MSM participated in this survey. Overall data showed that 87.2% of participants knew what PrEP is, but only 7.5% have ever used it. The main reason for not using PrEP was the cost of the therapy (26.9%). The principal source of PrEP information was the Internet (68.4%). Being regularly tested for HIV was significantly associated with PrEP knowledge (adjusted odds ratio (AdjOR) = 3.16; confidence interval (CI) = 1.06–9.29); Conclusions: Knowledge regarding PrEP was well established, but PrEP use was not equally widespread. It is necessary to improve research on PrEP usage in order to PrEP access to be granted.

scholarly journals Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analysis of behavior change communication apps: Assessment of key methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205520762110005
Author(s):  
Cynthia Afedi Hazel ◽  
Sheana Bull ◽  
Elizabeth Greenwell ◽  
Maya Bunik ◽  
Jini Puma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Behavior Change ◽  
Quantitative Measure ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Behavior Change Communication ◽  
Change Communication ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

Objective Evidence backing the effectiveness of mobile health technology is growing, and behavior change communication applications (apps) are fast becoming a useful platform for behavioral health programs. However, data to support the cost-effectiveness of these interventions are limited. Suggestions for overcoming the low output of economic data include addressing the methodological challenges for conducting cost-effectiveness analysis of behavior change app programs. This study is a systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of behavior change communication apps and a documentation of the reported challenges for investigating their cost-effectiveness. Materials and methods Four academic databases: Medline (Ovid), CINAHL, EMBASE and Google Scholar, were searched. Eligibility criteria included original articles that use a cost-effectiveness evaluation method, published between 2008 and 2018, and in the English language. Results Out of the 60 potentially eligible studies, 6 used cost-effectiveness analysis method and met the inclusion criteria. Conclusion The evidence to support the cost-effectiveness of behavior change communication apps is insufficient, with all studies reporting significant study challenges for estimating program costs and outcomes. The main challenges included limited or lack of cost data, inappropriate cost measures, difficulty with identifying and quantifying app effectiveness, representing app effects as Quality-adjusted Life Years, and aggregating cost and effects into a single quantitative measure like Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio. These challenges highlight the need for comprehensive economic evaluation methods that balance app data quality issues with practical concerns. This would likely improve the usefulness of cost-effectiveness data for decisions on adoption, implementation, scalability, sustainability, and the benefits of broader healthcare investments.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners and Clinical Nurse Specialists: What Is the Quality of the Evidence?

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faith Donald ◽  
Kelley Kilpatrick ◽  
Kim Reid ◽  
Nancy Carter ◽  
Ruth Martin-Misener ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Nurse Specialist ◽  
Clinical Nurse ◽  
Education Experience ◽  
The Cost

Background. Improved quality of care and control of healthcare costs are important factors influencing decisions to implement nurse practitioner (NP) and clinical nurse specialist (CNS) roles.Objective. To assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating NP and CNS cost-effectiveness (defined broadly to also include studies measuring health resource utilization).Design. Systematic review of RCTs of NP and CNS cost-effectiveness reported between 1980 and July 2012.Results. 4,397 unique records were reviewed. We included 43 RCTs in six groupings, NP-outpatient (n=11), NP-transition (n=5), NP-inpatient (n=2), CNS-outpatient (n=11), CNS-transition (n=13), and CNS-inpatient (n=1). Internal validity was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool; 18 (42%) studies were at low, 17 (39%) were at moderate, and eight (19%) at high risk of bias. Few studies included detailed descriptions of the education, experience, or role of the NPs or CNSs, affecting external validity.Conclusions. We identified 43 RCTs evaluating the cost-effectiveness of NPs and CNSs using criteria that meet current definitions of the roles. Almost half the RCTs were at low risk of bias. Incomplete reporting of study methods and lack of details about NP or CNS education, experience, and role create challenges in consolidating the evidence of the cost-effectiveness of these roles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document