scholarly journals PMS21 Functional Impairment, Disease Activity, and Duration of Disease Independently Affect the Quality of Life in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. A674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.M. Chiu ◽  
J.D. Wang ◽  
M.S. Lai
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Duration Of Disease

Evaluating the efficacy of intra-articular injections of platelet rich plasma (PRP) in rheumatoid arthritis patients and its impact on inflammatory cytokines, disease activity and quality of life.

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalia S. Saif ◽  
Nagwa N. Hegazy ◽  
Enas S. Zahran
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Inflammatory Cytokines ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Joint Inflammation ◽  
Monthly Interval ◽  
Post Injection ◽  
Tnf Α

Background: Among rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA), general disease activity is well regulated by diseasemodifying anti-rheumatic medications (DMARDS), but sometimes local inflammation still persists among a few joints. Adjuvant modern molecular interventions as Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) with a suggested down regulating effect on inflammatory mediators has a proven effect in management of RA. We aim to evaluate the therapeutic effect of intra-articular PRP versus steroid in RA patients and their impact on inflammatory cytokines IL1B , TNF α, local joint inflammation, disease activity and quality of life (QL). Methods: Open labeled parallel randomized control clinical trial was carried out on 60 RA patients randomly divided into 2 groups, Group 1: included 30 patients received 3 intra-articular injections of PRP at monthly interval, Group 2: included 30 patients received single intra-articular injection of steroid. They were subjected to clinical, laboratory, serum IL1B and TNF α assessment at baseline and at 3, 6 months post injection. Results: Patients of both groups showed improvements in their scores of evaluating tools at 3months post injection and this improvement was persistent in the PRP group up to 6 months post injection while it was continued only for 3 months in the steroid group. Conclusions: PRP is a safe, effective and useful therapy in treating RA patients who had insufficient response and persistent pain and inflammation in just one or two joints through its down regulating effect on inflammatory cytokines IL1B, TNF α with subsequent improvement of local joint inflammation, disease activity and QL.

scholarly journals FRI0651-HPR A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE OPEN-LABEL CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING THE PERFORMANCE OF A CONNECTED MONITORING INTERFACE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS VERSUS PHYSICAL ROUTINE MONITORING

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 929.1-930
Author(s):  
Y. M. Pers ◽  
V. Valsecchi ◽  
T. Mura ◽  
S. Aouinti ◽  
N. Filippi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Tight Control ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Monitoring Group ◽  
Disease Modifying

Background:Telemedicine has found wider application in chronic diseases for encouraging tight home-monitoring in order to improve patients’ outcome (Smolen et al. 2017).In previous studies, a high feasibility and high patient-satisfaction rate was found as well as the evidence for a superior or equal effectiveness of telemedicine compared to the standard face-to-face approach, however the results were weakened by some methodological biases and wide heterogeneity of interventions, thus preventing to draw definitive conclusions (Piga et al. 2017; Najm, Gossec, et al. 2019).Objectives:In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), telemedicine may allow a tight control of disease activity while reducing hospital visits. We developed a smartphone application connected with a physician’s interface to monitor RA patients. We aimed to assess the performance of this e-Health solution in comparison with routine practice in the management of patients with RA.Methods:A 6-month pragmatic, randomized, controlled, prospective, clinical trial was conducted in RA patients with high to moderate disease activity starting a new Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) therapy. Two groups were established: “connected monitoring” and “conventional monitoring”. The primary outcome was the number of physical visits between baseline and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included adherence, satisfaction, changes in clinical, functional, and health status scores (SF-12).Results:Of the 94 randomized patients, 89 completed study: 44 in the “conventional monitoring” arm and 45 in the “connected monitoring” arm. The total number of physical visits between baseline and 6 month was significantly lower in the “connected monitoring” group (0.42 ± 0.58 versus 1.93 ± 0.55; p<0.05). No differences between groups were observed in the clinical and functional scores. A better quality of life for SF-12 subscores (Role-Physical, Social-Functioning and Role-Emotional) were found in the “connected monitoring” group.Conclusion:According to our results, a connected monitoring reduces the number of physical visits while maintaining a tight control of disease activity and improving quality of life in patients with RA starting a new treatment.References:[1] Najm, Aurelie, Laure Gossec, Catherine Weill, David Benoist, Francis Berenbaum, and Elena Nikiphorou. 2019. “Mobile Health Apps for Self-Management of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: Systematic Literature Review.”JMIR MHealth and UHealth7 (11): e14730.https://doi.org/10.2196/14730.[2] Piga, Matteo, Ignazio Cangemi, Alessandro Mathieu, and Alberto Cauli. 2017. “Telemedicine for Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Systematic Review and Proposal for Research Agenda.”Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism47 (1): 121–28.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.014.[3] Smolen, Josef S, Robert Landewe, Johannes Bijlsma, Gerd Burmester, Katerina Chatzidionysiou, Maxime Dougados, Jackie Nam, et al. 2017. “EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Synthetic and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 2016 Update.”Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases76 (6): 960–77.https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

P018 Functional impairment in enthesitis related arthritis patients

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanene Ferjani ◽  
Hiba Bettaieb ◽  
Lobna Ben Ammar ◽  
Kaouther Maatallah ◽  
Dorra Ben Nessib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Morning Stiffness ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Enthesitis Related Arthritis ◽  
Asas Criteria

Abstract Background Enthesitis related arthritis (ERA) is a subgroup of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. It is characterized by the presence of enthesitis and predominately lower limb arthritis and can affect sacroiliac joint and spine. Recent studies showed that ERA is associated with worse physical status and poorer quality of life (1). The main objective of this study was to compare the aspects of functional status in patients (ERA) and patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods A retrospective monocentric study was carried out on patients with ERA (ILAR criteria) or SpA (ASAS Criteria). Demographic data and clinical characteristics were obtained from medical records. Disease activity was evaluated by: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein rate (CRP) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Functional impairment was evaluated by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of life Questionnaire (ASQoL). Global well-being was assessed by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Index (BASGI). Population was divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) stands for ERA patients and group 2 (G2) stands for SpA patients. P &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 174 patients (40 ERA and 134 SpA) were enrolled. Mean age at disease onset was 12.4 ± 3 years in G1 and 27.8 ± 8 years in G2. Male to female sex ratio was 5.6 in G1 and 3.7 in G2. Morning stiffness (&gt;60 min) was reported by 37.5% of G1 and 49.3%. G1 patients had longer morning stiffness than G2 (61 [0–90] min vs 30 [0–240] min; P = 0.58). Multiple nocturnal awakenings were reported by 45% of G1 patients and 58.2% of G2 patients. Median BASDAI score was 4.9 [1–44] in G1 and 4.5 in G2 [0–10] (P = 0.48). Median BASGI score was 6 [1.5–9.5] in G1 and 6 [0–10] in G2 (P = 0.58). Median ESR was 35 mm/h [8–90] in G1 and 35 mm/h [2–125] in G2. Median CRP was 18.2 mg/l [1–70] in G1 and 13 mg/l [3–180] in G2. The assessment of functional status revealed that G1 patients had higher BASFI scores than G2 patients (5.2 vs 4.5). The association between G1 and BASFI was statistically significant (P = 0.05). Median ASQoL was 12 [2–17] in G1 and 9 [0–18] in G2. No link was noted between G1 and ASQoL score (P = 0.152). Conclusion Our study showed that ERA was associated with higher BASFI scores in comparison with SpA. Treat-to target strategies are mandatory in order to optimize the functional status of children with ERA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document