Platelet-rich plasma versus Tenex in the treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison L. Boden ◽  
Michael T. Scott ◽  
Poonam P. Dalwadi ◽  
Kenneth Mautner ◽  
R. Amadeus Mason ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-141
Author(s):  
Mohammad Tariqul Islam ◽  
M. A. Shakoor ◽  
Afsana Mahjabin ◽  
Md. Ali Emran

Lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) is a major cause of musculoskeletal pain involving common extensor origin of the forearm. This study was done to determine the effects of platelet-rich plasma on 15 patients with lateral epicondylitis. Selected patients were given intralesional platelet-rich plasma injection, activity of daily living instructions and paracetamol. Patients were assessed every 14 days interval by visual analogue scale, and the patient rated tennis elbow evaluation. Treatment response according to visual analogue scale and patient rated tennis elbow evaluation tool, the difference of improvement was found in respect to time, from pretreatment W1 (just before 1st Intervention) score to W11 score in every alternate week (p<0.005). This indicates that intralesional platelet-rich plasma is effective in the patients with lateral epicondylitis of elbow.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat ◽  
Leyla Sedighipour ◽  
Seyed Mansoor Rayegani ◽  
Mohammad Hasan Bahrami ◽  
Masume Bayat ◽  
...  

Background. Autologous whole blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have been both suggested to treat chronic tennis elbow. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of PRP versus autologous whole blood local injection in chronic tennis elbow. Methods. Forty patients with tennis elbow were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated with a single injection of 2 mL of autologous PRP and group 2 with 2 mL of autologous blood. Tennis elbow strap, stretching, and strengthening exercises were administered for both groups during a 2-month followup. Pain and functional improvements were assessed using visual analog scale (VAS), modified Mayo Clinic performance index for the elbow, and pressure pain threshold (PPT) at 0, 4, and 8 weeks. Results. All pain and functional variables including VAS, PPT, and Mayo scores improved significantly in both groups 4 weeks after injection. No statistically significant difference was noted between groups regarding pain scores in 4-week follow-up examination (P>0.05). At 8-week reevaluations, VAS and Mayo scores improved only in PRP group (P<0.05). Conclusion. PRP and autologous whole blood injections are both effective to treat chronic lateral epicondylitis. PRP might be slightly superior in 8-week followup. However, further studies are suggested to get definite conclusion.


Author(s):  
Pratush Kumar Goyal ◽  
Anil Kumar Pandey ◽  
Akhil Bansal ◽  
Mohammad Zuber

Background: Lateral epicondylitis is seen more commonly in non-athletes than athletes. Non-operative methods are the mainstay of treatment being effective in more than 95% of cases. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) has shown promising results in many studies as compared to steroid injection & other modes of conservative management. Hence, this study was done to evaluate PRP efficacy in our clinical setup and in the people of age group most commonly being affected. Methods: This randomized study was conducted at Gandhi Medical College & Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal, for a period of two years from Aug 2015 to Sep 2017 on 60 consenting patients diagnosed as suffering from lateral epicondylitis. Using lottery method for randomization the patients were divided into two groups, based on which the treatment was received. Group –1 with 30 patients received 2 ml of PRP. Group –2 with 30 patients received 2 ml of Triamcinolone injection. The data collected and recorded in the appropriate proforma. Post therapy assessment was done using with Oxford elbow score. Results:  Average age at presentation was 31.11 years, Range of age was from 20 to 40 years. Maximum incidence was in the age group of 35 to 40 years. Female preponderance was observed in Group 1. Most common presenting complaint was elbow pain seen in 100% of cases. Most common side involved was the dominant side right side involvement was seen in 41 cases and left side in 19 cases. The Oxford elbow score pre-treatment in all the groups was not statistically significant and the Oxford elbow score at the end of 6 weeks,12 weeks and 24 weeks treatment showed that PRP is better than  steroid  in control of pain. Conclusion: Lateral epicondylitis/Tennis elbow is a painful debilitating condition of elbow, which creates disturbance in functional activities. A single injection of PRP at the site of the elbow pain resulted in relief of pain in patients with longer duration as compared to local steroids to other conservative treatments. Keywords: Tennis elbow, Platelet rich plasma, Steroid, Triamcinolone, Lateral epicondylitis


2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyaneshwar Tonk ◽  
Anish Kumar ◽  
Amit Gupta

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Barnett ◽  
Madison N. Bernacki ◽  
Jessica L. Kainer ◽  
Hannah N. Smith ◽  
Annette M. Zaharoff ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The lateral epicondyle is a common site for chronic tendinosis (i.e. lateral epicondylitis), a condition characterized by overuse and degeneration of a tendon due to repeated microtrauma. This leads to pain and functional limitations. There is a growing interest in non-surgical forms of treatment for this condition including provision of corticosteroid injections and regenerative injection therapy (provision of autologous blood and platelet rich plasma injections). Objective We compared the effectiveness of corticosteroids with regenerative injection therapy for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Methods We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials published in English language from 2008 to 2018. Databases used included PEDro, Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL. Nine articles met our selection criteria. The PEDRo scale scores helped assess study quality. Cochrane risk of bias criteria helped assess bias. We analyzed results focusing on pain and function using meta-analyses. Results Six out of 9 studies had low risk of bias. There were no short-term (1 and 2 month) differences in pain scores between the corticosteroid and regenerative injection groups. Participants receiving regenerative injections demonstrated greater long-term improvements lasting for a period of ≈2 years. Conclusion Regenerative injections provision results in greater long–term pain relief and improved function for people with lateral epicondylitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document