A brief negotiation interview adherence scale for smoking cessation: A psychometric evaluation

Author(s):  
Michael V. Pantalon ◽  
James Dziura ◽  
Fang-Yong Li ◽  
Gail D'Onofrio ◽  
June Weiss ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0247867
Author(s):  
Amanda M. Palmer ◽  
Steven K. Sutton ◽  
John B. Correa ◽  
Vani N. Simmons ◽  
Thomas H. Brandon

The Abstinence-Related Motivational Engagement (ARME) scale was developed to assess motivation to remain abstinent after a smoking cessation attempt. The ARME demonstrated reliability and validity among a small sample of ex-smokers. This study expands the psychometric evaluation of the ARME and tests the ARME as a predictor of smoking status among a sample of participants quitting smoking. The parent trial tested the efficacy of a self-help smoking cessation intervention (N = 1874), with assessments every 6 months. Internal consistency and factor structure of the ARME was evaluated at each assessment to confirm use of the measure as designed. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing the ARME to the Situation-specific Abstinence Self-Efficacy (SSE) scale via inter-correlations and prediction of future smoking status. Finally, the trajectories of both the ARME and SSE were compared among continuous abstainers and continuous smokers. A single-factor structure was observed at each assessment. Cronbach’s alphas ranged from 0.88–0.91 for the total sample. Correlations between the ARME and the SSE ranged from 0.38–0.47 (ps <0.001) among smokers; and from 0.09–0.15 (most ps > 0.05) among abstainers. Among current smokers, the ARME and SSE were independent positive predictors of subsequent abstinence (AORs 1.28–2.29, ps <0.001). For those currently abstinent, only the SSE predicted subsequent abstinence (AORs 1.69–2.60, ps <0.05). GEE analyses showed different trajectories for the two measures, as well as between abstainers and smokers. In conclusion, the ARME is a reliable, valid measure with unique predictive utility for current smokers and a distinct trajectory among those who have successfully quit.


2021 ◽  
pp. 106342662110282
Author(s):  
Nathaniel J. Williams ◽  
James Beauchemin ◽  
Guido Giuntini ◽  
Jennifer Griffis ◽  
Ya Mo

Provider adherence to system of care principles in service interactions with families is an important indicator of behavioral health service quality for youth; however, valid and pragmatic measures suitable for monitoring this quality indicator at population scale have not been developed. This article reports on two studies that developed and evaluated such a measure. In Study 1, an iterative, family-partnered process resulted in generation of 18 items that demonstrated unidimensionality and strong reliability among caregivers of youth participating in behavioral health services ( N = 141). In Study 2, data from a second, statewide, stratified random sample of caregivers ( N = 351) confirmed the items’ unidimensionality, discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity. Higher scores on the System of Care Adherence Scale were associated with lower risk of youth psychiatric hospitalization, greater perceived improvement in youth functioning, and greater increases in caregivers’ self-efficacy to access services. Item response theory analyses indicated the items were strongly related to adherence; however, most were optimal for differentiating between low to moderate levels of adherence. The System of Care Adherence Scale is a psychometrically sound measure suitable for population surveillance of the extent to which families experience system of care principles in their interactions with providers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1482-1487
Author(s):  
Mingming Yu ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Lanzhu Guan ◽  
Min Qian ◽  
Jinghong Lv ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-630
Author(s):  
Deborah L. Kalra ◽  
Michael P. Carey ◽  
Valerie Greaud Folk

Health Scope ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laleh Soleimani ◽  
Farkhondeh Amin Shokravi ◽  
Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian ◽  
Mohammad Gholami Fesharaki

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-115
Author(s):  
Nahid Dehghan Nayeri ◽  
Mohammad Ali Yadegary ◽  
Khatereh Seylani ◽  
Elham Navab

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1363-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina B. Hoeppner ◽  
Wayne F. Velicer ◽  
Colleen A. Redding ◽  
Joseph S. Rossi ◽  
James O. Prochaska ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 641-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
JK Yip ◽  
JL Hay ◽  
JS Ostroff ◽  
RK Stewart ◽  
GD Cruz

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Michele G. Sullivan
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document