scholarly journals Differential proteomic analysis of drought stress response in leaves of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

2013 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 254-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Zadražnik ◽  
Kristin Hollung ◽  
Wolfgang Egge-Jacobsen ◽  
Vladimir Meglič ◽  
Jelka Šuštar-Vozlič
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris ◽  
Common Bean ◽  
Proteomic Analysis ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris L

scholarly journals Drought Stress Response in Agricultural Plants: A Case Study of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleš Sedlar ◽  
Marjetka Kidrič ◽  
Jelka Šuštar-Vozlič ◽  
Barbara Pipan ◽  
Tanja Zadražnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris ◽  
Common Bean ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris L ◽  
Agricultural Plants

scholarly journals Evaluation of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for drought stress adaptation in Ethiopia

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 367-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwabena Darkwa ◽  
Daniel Ambachew ◽  
Hussein Mohammed ◽  
Asrat Asfaw ◽  
Matthew W. Blair
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris ◽  
Common Bean ◽  
Stress Adaptation ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris L

scholarly journals Shoot and Root Growth in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Exposed to Gradual Drought Stress

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laily Ilman Widuri ◽  
Benyamin Lakitan ◽  
Erizal Sodikin ◽  
Mery Hasmeda ◽  
Mei Meihana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris ◽  
Root Growth ◽  
Common Bean ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris L ◽  
Shoot And Root Growth

2-DE-based proteomic analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seeds

2011 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. De La Fuente ◽  
A. Borrajo ◽  
J. Bermúdez ◽  
M. Lores ◽  
J. Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phaseolus Vulgaris ◽  
Common Bean ◽  
Proteomic Analysis ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris L

scholarly journals DEHYDRINS PATTERNS IN COMMON BEAN EXPOSED TO DROUGHT AND WATERED CONDITIONS

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
M. Claudia Castañeda-Saucedo ◽  
Leobigildo Córdova-Téllez ◽  
Ernesto Tapia-Campos ◽  
Adriana Delgado-Alvarado ◽  
Víctor A. González-Hernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris ◽  
Common Bean ◽  
Transient Response ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris L ◽  
Major Constraint ◽  
Induced Proteins

Drought is a major constraint for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in México. Dehydrins are constitutive or stress-induced proteins related with a protective role of membranes and macromolecules against denaturation, thus preventing loss of their function. In this work, seed production and patterns of dehydrins accumulation in leaves and pods were evaluated in common bean cv. ‘Otomí’ subjected to drought, as compared with well-irrigated plants. Drought applied at pod formation and seed filling (SF) reduced yield up to 57 %. An antibody against a consensus sequence present in most dehydrins allowed for dehydrin identification. Two dehydrins of 82 and 73 kDA turned up both in leaves and pods throughout all the evaluated conditions. Presumably, both dehydrins are constitutive in the ‘Otomí’ cultivar. These dehydrins showed higher expression than controls in leaves after 6 d of drought at seedling and SF stages, and in pods 6 d after drought had started at SF. Increased expression might provide better protection during early stages of seedling and seed development. Increments on 63, 36 and 22 kDa dehydrin expression in pods at late SF might coincide with plant developmental programs, which prepare seed for desiccation. Dehydrins of 158, 54, 46, and 41 kDa were detected in pods 10 d after floral opening as a transient response to drought stress in SF. These results indicate dehydrins are relevant during plant development, as well as during drought stress.

scholarly journals Biostimulants Application Alleviates Water Stress Effects on Yield and Chemical Composition of Greenhouse Green Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyridon A. Petropoulos ◽  
Ângela Fernandes ◽  
Sofia Plexida ◽  
Antonios Chrysargyris ◽  
Nikos Tzortzakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Chemical Composition ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris ◽  
Oxalic Acid ◽  
Common Bean ◽  
Acid Content ◽  
Total Yield ◽  
Ash Content ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris L ◽  
Variable Effect

The increasing scarcity of water demands proper water management practices to ensure crop sustainability. In this study, the effect of drought stress and biostimulants application on the yield and chemical composition of green pods and seeds of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) was evaluated. For this purpose, four commercially available biostimulant products, namely Nomoren (G), EKOprop (EK), Veramin Ca (V), and Twin-Antistress (TW), were tested under two irrigation regimes: normal irrigation (W+) and water-holding (W-) conditions. The highest increase (20.8%) of pods total yield was observed in EKW+ treatment due to the formation of more pods of bigger size compared to control treatment (CW+). In addition, the highest yield under drought stress conditions was recorded for the GW- treatment (5691 ± 139 kg/ha). Regarding the effects of biostimulants on the protein and ash content of pods, the application of VW+ treatment (first harvest of pods; 201 ± 1 and 79 ± 1 g/kg dw for proteins and ash content, respectively) and GW+ (second harvest of pods; 207.1 ± 0.1 and 68.4 ± 0.5 g/kg dw for proteins and ash content, respectively) showed the best results. For seeds, the application of GW+ treatment resulted in the highest content for fat, protein, and ash content (52.7 ± 0.1, 337 ± 1, 56 ± 1 g/kg dw) and energetic value (5474 ± 3 kcal/kg dw). γ-tocopherol was the main detected tocopherol in pods and seeds, and it was significantly increased by the application of TWW- (first harvest of pods; 6410 ± 40 μg/kg dw), VW- (second harvest of pods; 3500 ± 20 μg/kg dw), and VW+ (seeds; 39.8 ± 0.1 g/kg dw) treatments. EKW- treatment resulted in the lowest oxalic acid content for both pod harvests (26.3 ± 0.1 g/kg dw and 22.7 ± 0.2 g/kg dw for the first and second harvest of pods, respectively) when compared with the rest of the treatments where biostimulants were applied, although in all the cases, the oxalic acid content was considerably low. Fructose and sucrose were the main sugars detected in pods and seeds, respectively, while the highest content was recorded for the TWW- (first harvest of pods) and GW- (second harvest of pods and seeds) treatments. The main detected fatty acids in pods and seeds were α-linolenic, linoleic, and palmitic acid, with a variable effect of the tested treatments being observed. In conclusion, the application of biostimulants could be considered as an eco-friendly and sustainable means to increase the pod yield and the quality of common bean green pods and seeds under normal irrigation conditions. Promising results were also recorded regarding the alleviation of negative effects of drought stress, especially for the application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; G treatment), which increased the total yield of green pods. Moreover, the nutritional value and chemical composition of pods and seeds was positively affected by biostimulants application, although a product specific effect was recorded depending on the irrigation regime and harvesting time (pods and seeds).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document