Mass spectrometric and linear discriminant analysis of N-glycans of human serum alpha-1-acid glycoprotein in cancer patients and healthy individuals

2008 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tímea Imre ◽  
Tibor Kremmer ◽  
Károly Héberger ◽  
Éva Molnár-Szöllősi ◽  
Krisztina Ludányi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Human Serum ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Mass Spectrometric ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Acid Glycoprotein

scholarly journals Fisher linear discriminant analysis for classification and prediction of genomic susceptibility to stomach and colorectal cancers based on six STR loci in a northern Chinese Han population

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e7004
Author(s):  
Shuhong Hao ◽  
Ming Ren ◽  
Dong Li ◽  
Yujie Sui ◽  
Qingyu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Fisher Linear Discriminant ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Str Loci ◽  
Leave One Out

Objective Gastrointestinal cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The aim of this study was to verify whether the genotype of six short tandem repeat (STR) loci including AR, Bat-25, D5S346, ER1, ER2, and FGA is associated with the risk of gastric cancer (GC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) and to develop a model that allows early diagnosis and prediction of inherited genomic susceptibility to GC and CRC. Methods Alleles of six STR loci were determined using the peripheral blood of six colon cancer patients, five rectal cancer patients, eight GC patients, and 30 healthy controls. Fisher linear discriminant analysis (FDA) was used to establish the discriminant formula to distinguish GC and CRC patients from healthy controls. Leave-one-out cross validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to validate the accuracy of the formula. The relationship between the STR status and immunohistochemical (IHC) and tumor markers was analyzed using multiple correspondence analysis. Results D5S346 was confirmed as a GC- and CRC-related STR locus. For the first time, we established a discriminant formula on the basis of the six STR loci, which was used to estimate the risk coefficient of suffering from GC and CRC. The model was statistically significant (Wilks’ lambda = 0.471, χ2 = 30.488, df = 13, and p = 0.004). The results of leave-one-out cross validation showed that the sensitivity of the formula was 73.7% and the specificity was 76.7%. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.926, with a sensitivity of 73.7% and a specificity of 93.3%. The STR status was shown to have a certain relationship with the expression of some IHC markers and the level of some tumor markers. Conclusions The results of this study complement clinical diagnostic criteria and present markers for early prediction of GC and CRC. This approach will aid in improving risk awareness of susceptible individuals and contribute to reducing the incidence of GC and CRC by prevention and early detection.

scholarly journals Prediction of Depression in Cancer Patients With Different Classification Criteria, Linear Discriminant Analysis versus Logistic Regression

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Shayan ◽  
Naser Mohammad Gholi Mezerji ◽  
Leila Shayan ◽  
Parisa Naseri
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Classification Error ◽  
Model Assessment ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Optimal Model ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Selection Of

<p><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>Logistic regression (LR) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) are two popular<strong> </strong>statistical models for prediction of group membership. Although they are very similar, the LDA makes more assumptions about the data. When categorical and continuous variables used simultaneously, the optimal choice between the two models is questionable. In most studies, classification error (CE) is used to discriminate between subjects in several groups, but this index is not suitable to predict the accuracy of the outcome. The present study compared LR and LDA models using classification indices.</p><p><strong>METHODS:</strong> This cross-sectional study selected 243 cancer patients. Sample sets of different sizes (n = 50, 100, 150, 200, 220) were randomly selected and the CE, B, and Q classification indices were calculated by the LR and LDA models.</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> CE revealed the a lack of superiority for one model over the other, but the results showed that LR performed better than LDA for the B and Q indices in all situations. No significant effect for sample size on CE was noted for selection of an optimal model. Assessment of the accuracy of prediction of real data indicated that the B and Q indices are appropriate for selection of an optimal model.</p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> The results of this study showed that LR performs better in some cases and LDA in others when based on CE. The CE index is not appropriate for classification, although the B and Q indices performed better and offered more efficient criteria for comparison and discrimination between groups.</p>

Effect of Topography on Maize Grains Elemental Profile: A Chemometric Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1079-1087
Author(s):  
Jorgelina Z. Heredia ◽  
Carlos A. Moldes ◽  
Raúl A. Gil ◽  
José M. Camiña
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Analysis ◽  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Microwave Plasma ◽  
Emission Spectrometry ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Maize Seeds ◽  
Elemental Profile ◽  
Mineral Profile ◽  
Topographic Characteristics

Background: The elemental composition of maize grains depends on the soil, land and environment characteristics where the crop grows. These effects are important to evaluate the availability of nutrients with complex dynamics, such as the concentration of macro and micronutrients in soils, which can vary according to different topographies. There is available scarce information about the influence of topographic characteristics (upland and lowland) where culture is developed with the mineral composition of crop products, in the present case, maize seeds. On the other hand, the study of the topographic effect on crops using multivariate analysis tools has not been reported. Objective: This paper assesses the effect of topographic conditions on plants, analyzing the mineral profiles in maize seeds obtained in two land conditions: uplands and lowlands. Materials and Methods: The mineral profile was studied by microwave plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Samples were collected from lowlands and uplands of cultivable lands of the north-east of La Pampa province, Argentina. Results: Differentiation of maize seeds collected from both topographical areas was achieved by principal components analysis (PCA), cluster analysis (CA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). PCA model based on mineral profile allowed to differentiate seeds from upland and lowlands by the influence of Cr and Mg variables. A significant accumulation of Cr and Mg in seeds from lowlands was observed. Cluster analysis confirmed such grouping but also, linear discriminant analysis achieved a correct classification of both the crops, showing the effect of topography on elemental profile. Conclusions: Multi-elemental analysis combined with chemometric tools proved useful to assess the effect of topographic characteristics on crops.

Colorectal Cancer Classification and Survival Analysis Based on an Integrated RNA and DNA molecular signature

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohanad Mohammed ◽  
Henry Mwambi ◽  
Bernard Omolo
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Rnaseq Data

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer among women and men in the USA, and recent studies have shown an increasing incidence in less developed regions, including Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We developed a hybrid (DNA mutation and RNA expression) signature and assessed its predictive properties for the mutation status and survival of CRC patients. Methods: Publicly-available microarray and RNASeq data from 54 matched formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from the Affymetrix GeneChip and RNASeq platforms, were used to obtain differentially expressed genes between mutant and wild-type samples. We applied the support-vector machines, artificial neural networks, random forests, k-nearest neighbor, naïve Bayes, negative binomial linear discriminant analysis, and the Poisson linear discriminant analysis algorithms for classification. Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis. Results: Compared to the genelist from each of the individual platforms, the hybrid genelist had the highest accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for mutation status, across all the classifiers and is prognostic for survival in patients with CRC. NBLDA method was the best performer on the RNASeq data while the SVM method was the most suitable classifier for CRC across the two data types. Nine genes were found to be predictive of survival. Conclusion: This signature could be useful in clinical practice, especially for colorectal cancer diagnosis and therapy. Future studies should determine the effectiveness of integration in cancer survival analysis and the application on unbalanced data, where the classes are of different sizes, as well as on data with multiple classes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document