scholarly journals Intensive preoperative rehabilitation improves functional capacity and postoperative hospital length of stay in elderly patients with lung cancer [commentary]

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 184
Author(s):  
Linda Denehy
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary M. Deboard ◽  
Jonathan Grotts ◽  
Lisa Ferrigno

With increasing life expectancy, the elderly are participating in recreational activities traditionally pursued by younger persons. Elderly patients have many reasons for worse outcomes after trauma, one of which may be the rising use of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet medications. This study aimed to determine whether preinjury use of these agents yielded worse outcomes in geriatric patients injured during high-impact recreational activities. The National Trauma Data Bank was reviewed from 2007 to 2010 for patients ≥65 years admitted to Level I or II trauma centers with ICD-9 E-codes for specific mechanisms of injury. These included motorcycles, bicycles, snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, equestrian, water and alpine skiing, snowboarding, and others. Patients with preinjury bleeding disorder (BD), including warfarin and clopidogrel use, were compared with controls via a coarsened exact matching analysis. BD patients (294) were compared with 3929 controls. Although increased in BD patients, no significant mortality differences were observed in unmatched or matched analyses. BD patients yielded greater hospital length of stay (5 vs 4 days, P = 0.020) with increased odds of receiving five units or more of blood (7.0% vs 2.1%, odds ratio = 4.7, P < 0.001) and of deep vein thrombosis (7.6% vs 3.8%, odds ratio = 2.1, P = 0.018). Elderly patients with BD, including warfarin or clopidogrel use, do not seem to have significantly increased mortality after injury during specified recreational activities. BD patients had greater hospital length of stay, transfusion requirements, and deep vein thrombosis rates. These findings may inform counseling for those taking such medications as to the potential for adverse outcomes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan H. M. Brown ◽  
Umbreen Hafeez ◽  
Ahmed H. Abdelhafiz

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Won Song ◽  
Kyung Yeon Yoo ◽  
Yong Sung Ro ◽  
Taehee Pyeon ◽  
Hong-Beom Bae ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sugammadex is associated with few postoperative complications. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) are related to prolonged hospitalizations. Present study explored whether the use of sugammadex could reduce PPCs and thereby reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) after lung surgery. Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent elective open lobectomy for lung cancer from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients were divided into the sugammadex group and pyridostigmine group. The primary outcome was hospital LOS and secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and overall survival at 1 year. The cohort was subdivided into patients with and without prolonged LOS to explore the effects of sugammadex on outcomes in each group. Risk factors for LOS were determined via multivariate analyses. After propensity score matching, 127 patients were assigned to each group. Results Median hospital LOS was shorter (10.0 vs. 12.0 days) and the incidence of postoperative atelectasis was lower (18.1 vs. 29.9%) in the sugammadex group. However, no significant difference in overall survival between the groups was seen over 1 year (hazard ratio, 0.967; 95% confidence interval, 0.363 to 2.577). Sugammadex was a predictor related to LOS (exponential coefficient 0.88; 95% CI 0.82–0.95). Conclusions Our data suggest that sugammadex is a preferable agent for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reversal than cholinesterase inhibitors in this patient population. Trial registration This study registered in the Clinical Research Information Service of the Korea National Institute of Health (approval number: KCT0004735, Date of registration: 21 January 2020, Retrospectively registered).


1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 962-962
Author(s):  
A. M. Clarfield ◽  
J. Shamian ◽  
J. Maclean

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document