scholarly journals (489) An examination of the roles of perceived injustice and pain acceptance on pain interference and pain intensity in patients with chronic pain: A Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry (CHOIR) Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. S97 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Carriere ◽  
B. Darnall ◽  
M. Kao ◽  
S. Mackey
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Interference ◽  
Perceived Injustice ◽  
Pain Acceptance

scholarly journals MECHANISM OF ACTION: AGE DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY FOR CHRONIC PAIN

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S809-S809
Author(s):  
Julie L Wetherell ◽  
Matthew Herbert ◽  
Niloofar Afari
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Acceptance And Commitment Therapy ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Pain Interference ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
Pain Acceptance ◽  
Commitment Therapy ◽  
Acceptance And Commitment

Abstract A recent randomized comparison of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) vs. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for chronic pain found a clear age interaction effect, such that older adults benefitted more from ACT. In a subsequent study comparing ACT delivered in person to ACT delivered via telehealth to a sample of veterans (N=128, mean age 51.9, SD 13.3, range 25-89), we found no significant age by modality interactions, suggesting that older veterans responded as well as younger people did to telehealth delivery. Consistent with our previous findings, we found a trend for older adults to experience greater reduction in pain interference (p = .051) and significantly greater reduction in pain severity (p = .001) than younger adults following ACT. In younger veterans, change in pain acceptance from baseline to posttreatment was related to change in pain interference from baseline to 6-month follow-up (r = -.38), but change in pain interference from baseline to posttreatment was not related to change in pain acceptance from baseline to follow-up (r = .14), suggesting that, consistent with the ACT model, increased pain acceptance at posttreatment was related to reduced pain interference at follow-up. By contrast, in older veterans, both correlations were significant and of comparable magnitude (rs = -.43 and -.46, respectively), providing no support for the idea that change in pain acceptance drove change in pain interference. Overall, our findings suggest that ACT may work better in older adults with chronic pain than in younger adults, but via a different mechanism.

scholarly journals Early Changes in Pain Acceptance Predict Pain Outcomes in Interdisciplinary Treatment for Chronic Pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Probst ◽  
Jank ◽  
Dreyer ◽  
Seel ◽  
Wagner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Interdisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Pain Acceptance ◽  
Pain Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Studies have shown that pain acceptance is associated with a better pain outcome. The current study explored whether changes in pain acceptance in the very early treatment phase of an interdisciplinary cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-based treatment program for chronic pain predict pain outcomes. A total of 69 patients with chronic, non-malignant pain (at least 6 months) were treated in a day-clinic for four-weeks. Pain acceptance was measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ), pain outcomes included pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS) as well as affective and sensory pain perception (Pain Perception Scale, SES-A and SES-S). Regression analyses controlling for the pre-treatment values of the pain outcomes, age, and gender were performed. Early changes in pain acceptance predicted pain intensity at post-treatment measured with the NRS (B = −0.04 (SE = 0.02); T = −2.28; p = 0.026), affective pain perception at post-treatment assessed with the SES-A (B = −0.26 (SE = 0.10); T = −2.79; p = 0.007), and sensory pain perception at post-treatment measured with the SES-S (B = -0.19 (SE = 0.08); T = -2.44; p = 0.017) . Yet, a binary logistic regression analysis revealed that early changes in pain acceptance did not predict clinically relevant pre-post changes in pain intensity (at least 2 points on the NRS). Early changes in pain acceptance were associated with pain outcomes, however, the impact was beneath the threshold defined as clinically relevant.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Determinants of Pain and Pain-Related Disability in Urban and Rural Settings in Southeastern Ontario

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean A Tripp ◽  
Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof ◽  
Margo McAlister
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Health Care Utilization ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Interference ◽  
Urban Region ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
The Past ◽  
Pain Prevalence

BACKGROUND: Canadian chronic pain prevalence estimates range from 11% to 66%, are affected by sampling and measurement bias, and largely represent urban settings.OBJECTIVES: To estimate chronic pain prevalence and factors associated with pain in southeastern Ontario, a region with a larger rural than urban residence.METHODS: A systematic sampling with a random start was used to contact households. A telephone-administered questionnaire using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale, with questions on health care and medication use, health status, depression and demographics, was administered to consenting adults (18 to 94 years of age; mean age 50.2±16.6 years).RESULTS: The response rate was 49% (1067 of 2167), with 76% reporting some pain over the past six months. Low pain intensity with low pain interference prevalence was 34% (grade I), high pain intensity with low pain interference was 26% (grade II), and high pain intensity with high pain interference was 17% (grades III and IV). Of those reporting pain, 49% reported chronic pain (ie, pain for a minimum of 90 days over the past six months) representing 37% of the sample. Being female, unmarried, lower income, poorer self-reported health status and rural residence were associated with increasing pain. Once depression was considered in this pain analysis, residence was no longer significant. Lower rates of health care utilization were reported by rural residents. In those reporting the highest pain grades, poor health, greater medication and health care use, depression and more pain sites were associated with higher odds for pain-related disability.CONCLUSION: There is an elevated prevalence of pain in this almost equally split rural/urban region. Further examination of health care utilization and depression is suggested in chronic pain prevalence research.

The buffering role of positive affect on the association between pain intensity and pain related outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan S.K. Thong ◽  
Gabriel Tan ◽  
Mark P. Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Negative Affect ◽  
Positive Affect ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Sleep Problems ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Pain Interference ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Impact

AbstractObjectivesChronic pain is a significant problem worldwide and is associated with significant elevations in negative affect, depressive symptoms, sleep problems, and physical dysfunction. Positive affect could potentially buffer the impact of pain on patient functioning. If it does, then positive affect could be directly targeted in treatment to benefit individuals with chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to test for such moderating effects.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study, we administered measures of pain intensity, depressive symptoms, sleep problems, pain interference, and positive and negative affect to 100 individuals with chronic back or knee pain in a single face-to-face assessment session.ResultsThe associations between pain intensity and negative affect, and between pain intensity and depressive symptoms were moderated by positive affect. This moderation effect was explained by the fact that participants with low positive affect evidenced strong associations between pain intensity and both depression and negative affect; participants with high positive affect, on the other hand, evidenced weak and non-significant associations between pain intensity and both depression and negative affect. Positive affect did not moderate the associations between pain intensity and either sleep problems or pain interference.ConclusionThe findings are consistent with the possibility that positive affect may buffer the impact of pain intensity on negative affect and depressive symptoms. Longitudinal and experimental research is needed to determine the potential benefits of treatments that increase positive affect on negative affect and depressive symptoms in chronic pain populations.ImplicationsThe study findings suggest the possibility that “positive psychology” interventions which increase positive affect could benefit individuals with chronic pain by reducing the impact of pain on negative outcomes. Research to test this possibility is warranted.

Effects of Eight-Week-Web-Based Mindfulness Training on Pain Intensity, Pain Acceptance, and Life Satisfaction in Individuals With Chronic Pain

2016 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 586-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Henriksson ◽  
Emma Wasara ◽  
Michael Rönnlund
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Mindfulness Training ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Pain Acceptance ◽  
Mindfulness Skills ◽  
Online Discussion Forum

This study examined the effects of an eight-week-web-based mindfulness program designed for individuals with chronic pain. A sample of 107 participants with chronic pain ( M = 51.0 years, SD = 9.3) were randomly assigned to a treatment group and a control group. The mindfulness program involved 20 minutes of training per day, six days a week, for eight weeks. During this period, the control group was invited to an online discussion forum involving pain-related topics. A total of 77 participants completed the postintervention assessment ( n = 36 in the treatment group, n = 41 in the control group). The group assigned to mindfulness training showed increased mindfulness skills (Cohen’s d = 1.18), reduced pain intensity ( d = 0.47–0.82), reduced pain-related interference/suffering ( d = 0.39–0.85), heightened pain acceptance ( d = 0.66), reduced affective distress ( d = 0.67), and higher ratings of life satisfaction ( d = 0.54) following the training with no or minor changes up for the control group ( d values 0.01–0.23), a pattern substantiated by significant group-by-time interactions. Despite limitations of this study, including a less than ideal control group to isolate effects of mindfulness and lack of a long-term follow-up, the results appear promising and may motivate further investigations.

scholarly journals An Empirical Classification of Chronic Pain Subgroups in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: A Cluster-Analytic Approach

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 491-491
Author(s):  
Soumitri Sil ◽  
Alison Manikowski ◽  
Mallory Schneider ◽  
Lindsey L Cohen ◽  
Carlton D. Dampier
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Cluster Analysis ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Pain Interference ◽  
Pain Characteristics

Abstract Introduction: Youth with sickle cell disease (SCD) and chronic pain are a heterogeneous group with variability in their daily pain experience and physical and psychosocial functioning. We aimed to 1) empirically derive chronic pain subgroups based on sensory pain characteristics using cluster analysis within a sample of youth with chronic SCD pain, and 2) investigate derived subgroups for differences in sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and psychosocial and functional outcomes. We hypothesized that chronic SCD pain subgroups with higher sensory pain experiences would be associated with poorer functional and psychosocial outcomes. Methods: Children and adolescents receiving care at comprehensive SCD clinics at three tertiary care locations within a southeast children's hospital were included if they were aged 10-18 years, any SCD genotype, reported chronic pain (i.e., pain on most days per month for a duration of at least 3 months), and had English fluency. Youth were excluded if they had comorbid medical conditions typically associated with pain but unrelated to SCD or had significant cognitive or developmental limitations that would interfere with study procedures. Patients completed a battery of patient-reported outcomes including pain characteristics (i.e., intensity, frequency, and the Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool to assess number of pain locations and pain quality descriptors), PROMIS Pediatric Short Forms for pain interference, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, the Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale for sleep quality, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization outcomes were abstracted from electronic medical records including number of inpatient admissions for pain and emergency department visits for pain in the prior 12 months. Chronic SCD pain subgroups were based on sensory pain characteristics including pain intensity ratings, pain frequency, number of body sites affected by pain, and pain quality descriptors. Hierarchical cluster analysis informed the number of clusters at the patient level. K-means cluster analysis was used to assign patients to clusters once the number of clusters was established. Clusters were compared on sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization, and child psychosocial and functional outcomes. Results: Youth (n=62) were on average (M) 13.9 years old (SD=2.5), 56% female, 95% Black or African American, and 85% Non-Hispanic/Latinx. Most (75%) had HbSS or HbSβ 0 and 67% were prescribed hydroxyurea. Hierarchical cluster analysis and k-means clustering supported a 2-cluster solution (see Figure 1). Cluster 1 (n=35; Frequent, Moderate Pain) was distinguished by significantly lower scores on worst pain intensity (M=6.4, SD=0.4), lower number of pain days per month (M=12.1, SD=2.8), fewer number of body sites affected by pain (M=8.9, SD=0.9), and lower pain quality ratings (M=15.9, SD=1.3). Cluster 2 (n=27; Almost Daily, High Pain) represented patients who reported high ratings of worst pain intensity (M=8.2, SD=0.3), daily to almost daily pain (M=20.3, SD=1.7), higher number of body sties affected by pain (M=12.5, SD=1.5), and higher ratings of pain quality (M=40.8, SD=1.9) (all p's <.05). There were no differences between chronic SCD pain subgroups by sociodemographics (e.g., age, sex, family income), clinical characteristics (e.g., genotype, history of avascular necrosis, disease-modifying treatments, prescribed long-acting opioids, neuropathic medications, or antidepressants), or healthcare utilization. Patients in the Almost Daily High Pain subgroup reported significantly higher pain interference, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing compared to patients in the Frequent, Moderate Pain subgroup (see Table 1). There were no differences between subgroups on anxiety or sleep quality. Conclusions: Two subgroups of chronic SCD pain were identified based on pain, psychosocial, and functional outcomes. Beyond sensory pain characteristics, pain interference, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing were the only variables that best differentiated the chronic SCD pain subgroups. These empirically derived subgroups are comparable to other non-SCD chronic pain subgroups in pediatrics and adults. Identifying homogenous chronic SCD pain subtypes can inform tailored assessment and management of chronic pain. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Social support buffers the negative influence of perceived injustice on pain interference in people living with HIV and chronic pain

PAIN Reports ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence M. Penn ◽  
Zina Trost ◽  
Romy Parker ◽  
William P. Wagner ◽  
Michael A. Owens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Pain Interference ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Perceived Injustice ◽  
Living With Hiv
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document