Assessment of the Quality of Postherpetic Neuralgia Treatment Information on the Internet

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thor Hallingbye ◽  
Mario Serafini
Keyword(s):  
Postherpetic Neuralgia ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Treatment Information

What Information Can the Lay Public Find About Osteoporosis Treatment? A Descriptive Study Coding the Content and Quality of Bisphosphonate Information on the Internet (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Fuzzell ◽  
Matthew J. Richards ◽  
Liana Fraenkel ◽  
Susan L. Stark ◽  
Mary C. Politi
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Osteoporosis Treatment ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Integrative Health ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Gastrointestinal Problems

BACKGROUND The US Preventative Services Task Force recommends osteoporosis screening and treatment with bisphosphonates in high risk populations. However, bisphosphonate use among individuals with osteoporosis remains low and has declined in recent years. The content and quality of information from outside sources may influence individuals’ bisphosphonate decisions. OBJECTIVE To assess the content and quality of osteoporosis treatment information available to the public by conducting an internet search and coding available bisphosphonate information. METHODS Nine search terms about osteoporosis and bisphosphonates were entered into four search engines. Two raters assessed websites for information about bisphosphonates, whether and how benefits and side effects were described and quantified, contraindications, and dosing instructions. Coders also assessed website interface and slant/balance of information. RESULTS 1044 websites were identified. 202 websites met inclusion criteria and were coded. The most common bisphosphonate benefit described was prevention of bone density loss (77.2% of websites). The most common side effects described were gastrointestinal problems (65.3%) and jaw osteonecrosis (60.4%). Most websites did not quantify bisphosphonate benefits (76.7%) or side effects (81.2%). Complementary/integrative health websites (p = .000) and pharmaceutical litigation websites (p = .000) were more often slanted against taking bisphosphonates, compared to all websites coded. General medical knowledge websites were more balanced than other websites (p = .05). CONCLUSIONS The quality of bisphosphonate information on the internet varies substantially. Providers counseling patients about osteoporosis treatment should inquire about patients’ baseline bisphosphonate knowledge. Providers can complement accurate information and address potential bisphosphonate misconceptions.

The quality of snoring treatment information on the internet

2014 ◽  
Vol 271 (12) ◽  
pp. 3319-3323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vik Veer ◽  
Glen Alder ◽  
Umesh Ullal
Keyword(s):  
The Internet ◽  
Treatment Information

scholarly journals Quality of Internet-Based Information on Gastrointestinal Diseases

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Tangri ◽  
Nilesh Chande
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Disease ◽  
Gastrointestinal Diseases ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Internet Resources ◽  
Use Of The Internet ◽  
Institutional Websites

BACKGROUND: The Internet is becoming an increasingly common source of health information for patients.OBJECTIVE: To examine the quality of gastrointestinal disease- and symptom-related Internet sites that might be searched by patients.METHODS: A total of 120 websites were evaluated from July to November 2009 using the DISCERN instrument to determine the quality of content of health and treatment information.RESULTS: There was substantial variability in the quality of Internet resources regarding gastrointestinal diseases and their symptoms. Information-based and institutional websites were rated highest. Resources related to celiac disease, colon cancer and abdominal pain scored the highest.CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the quality of web-based resources was variable. Because patient education is important in the management of gastroenterological diseases, the increasing use of the Internet poses new opportunities and challenges for physicians.

Quality and Accessibility of Autism Treatment Information on the Internet

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A. Deling ◽  
Erin Olufs ◽  
Katherine Frazier ◽  
Nicole Kressin ◽  
Michael B. Himle
Keyword(s):  
The Internet ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Autism Treatment

Analysis of Reading, Reference and Information Management on the Quality of Scientific Writing

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zarlis ◽  
Sherly Astuti ◽  
Muhammad Salamuddin
Keyword(s):  
Information Management ◽  
Scientific Writing ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Management Skill ◽  
Library Search ◽  
Important Thing ◽  
Reading Material ◽  
Quality Of Research

In education, for educational instruments scientific writing is a very important thing. It requires an information management skill, information management is a library search, which can be done through a computer and guided by the internet. It can also be through the quality of reading used as a reference for scientific writing. In addition, in producing a paper also must know the management of writing, not only required to pay attention to the rules of standard language, but also must be able to convey ideas and ideas well and meet scientific criteria, such as making a quote or reference list used. This paper was written with the aim of improving the quality of research through reading material, making notes and avoiding plagiarism, references using the Harvard system for journals, books, and articles. Management of citing articles either CD or internet, writing, editing, storing references electronically, writing bibliography, and quotations.

Citizen Deliberation Online

2019 ◽  
pp. 689-712
Author(s):  
Patrícia Rossini ◽  
Jennifer Stromer-Galley
Keyword(s):  
Political Engagement ◽  
Future Research ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Digital Platforms ◽  
The Core ◽  
Political Conversation ◽  
Political Talk ◽  
Citizen Deliberation ◽  
The Impact

Political conversation is at the heart of democratic societies, and it is an important precursor of political engagement. As society has become intertwined with the communication infrastructure of the Internet, we need to understand its uses and the implications of those uses for democracy. This chapter provides an overview of the core topics of scholarly concern around online citizen deliberation, focusing on three key areas of research: the standards of quality of communication and the normative stance on citizen deliberation online; the impact and importance of digital platforms in structuring political talk; and the differences between formal and informal political talk spaces. After providing a critical review of these three major areas of research, we outline directions for future research on online citizen deliberation.

scholarly journals THE NONRANDOM WALK OF KNOWLEDGE

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-264
Author(s):  
Jane R. Bambauer ◽  
Saura Masconale ◽  
Simone M. Sepe
Keyword(s):  
Expert Testimony ◽  
Selection Effect ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Rational Agents ◽  
Social Media Platforms ◽  
Wide Scale ◽  
Evidence Gathering ◽  
Epistemic Goals ◽  
Epistemic Process

AbstractA person’s epistemic goals sometimes clash with pragmatic ones. At times, rational agents will degrade the quality of their epistemic process in order to satisfy a goal that is knowledge-independent (for example, to gain status or at least keep the peace with friends.) This is particularly so when the epistemic quest concerns an abstract political or economic theory, where evidence is likely to be softer and open to interpretation. Before wide-scale adoption of the Internet, people sought out or stumbled upon evidence related to a proposition in a more random way. And it was difficult to aggregate the evidence of friends and other similar people to the exclusion of others, even if one had wanted to. Today, by contrast, the searchable Internet allows people to simultaneously pursue social and epistemic goals.This essay shows that the selection effect caused by a merging of social and epistemic activities will cause both polarization in beliefs and devaluation of expert testimony. This will occur even if agents are rational Bayesians and have moderate credences before talking to their peers. What appears to be rampant dogmatism could be just as well explained by the nonrandom walk in evidence-gathering. This explanation better matches the empirical evidence on how people behave on social media platforms. It also helps clarify why media outlets (not just the Internet platforms) might have their own pragmatic reasons to compromise their epistemic goals in today’s competitive and polarized information market. Yet, it also makes policy intervention much more difficult, since we are unlikely to neatly separate individuals’ epistemic goals from their social ones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document