Effect of the process parameters in the additive manufacturing of in situ Al/AlN samples

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Riquelme ◽  
P. Rodrigo ◽  
M.D. Escalera-Rodriguez ◽  
J. Rams
2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambrish Singh ◽  
Seema Negi ◽  
Sajan Kapil ◽  
K. P. Karunakaran ◽  
Manas Das

Abstract Anisotropy and omnidirectionality are the two most significant impediments to the growth of additive manufacturing (AM). While anisotropy is a property of the part, omnidirectionality is a characteristic of the machine tool. Omnidirectionality, implying invariance in AM processes with the goal of minimizing variations in material and geometric properties of the as-built parts, is often ignored during systems and process design. Disregard to directional sensitivity, which in some cases are inherent to the process (and/ or system), inadvertently changes the process parameter in-situ consequently, producing parts with non-uniform and often erratic properties. AM, attributing to its sheer number of processing variables, is especially susceptible to this subtle, yet significant system property. While some AM platforms, due to their nature of part production, are inherently omnidirectional, others require additional setup to ensure the same. Having an omnidirectional AM platform ensures that the parts are fabricated with process variables that are equally sensitive in all directions. In most AM systems, given a fixed set of process parameters, the spatial orientation of fusion (or joining) source vector, feedstock-delivery vector, and travel direction vector relative to each other governs omnidirectionality. Inconsistency or change in orientation of these three vectors results in non-uniform part properties and variations in geometric dimensions. Therefore, AM systems have to be omnidirectional to improve part performance and promote industrial acceptance. This paper, through a formal definition of omnidirectionality, analyses these three vectors individually along with their interplay with other process parameters and design variables.


Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2450
Author(s):  
Andreas Borowski ◽  
Christian Vogel ◽  
Thomas Behnisch ◽  
Vinzenz Geske ◽  
Maik Gude ◽  
...  

Continuous carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites have convincing anisotropic properties, which can be used to strengthen structural components in a local, variable and efficient way. In this study, an additive manufacturing (AM) process is introduced to fabricate in situ consolidated continuous fibre-reinforced polycarbonate. Specimens with three different nozzle temperatures were in situ consolidated and tested in a three-point bending test. Computed tomography (CT) is used for a detailed analysis of the local material structure and resulting material porosity, thus the results can be put into context with process parameters. In addition, a highly curved test structure was fabricated that demonstrates the limits of the process and dependent fibre strand folding behaviours. These experimental investigations present the potential and the challenges of additive manufacturing-based in situ consolidated continuous fibre-reinforced polycarbonate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 972-981
Author(s):  
Daniel Kaczmarek ◽  
Daniel Walczyk ◽  
James Garofalo ◽  
Margaret Sobkowicz-Kline

Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 190
Author(s):  
Wei Wu ◽  
Jiaxiang Xue ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Hongyan Lin ◽  
Heqing Tang ◽  
...  

Serious heat accumulation limits the further efficiency and application in additive manufacturing (AM). This study accordingly proposed a double-wire SS316L stainless steel arc AM with a two-direction auxiliary gas process to research the effect of three parameters, such as auxiliary gas nozzle angle, auxiliary gas flow rate and nozzle-to-substrate distance on depositions, then based on the Box–Behnken Design response surface, a regression equation between three parameters and the total score were established to optimized parameters by an evaluation system. The results showed that samples with nozzle angle of 30° had poor morphology but good properties, and increasing gas flow or decreasing distance would enhance the airflow strength and stiffness, then strongly stir the molten pool and resist the interference. Then a diverse combination of auxiliary process parameters had different influences on the morphology and properties, and an interactive effect on the comprehensive score. Ultimately the optimal auxiliary gas process parameters were 17.4°, 25 L/min and 10.44 mm, which not only bettered the morphology, but refined the grains and improved the properties due to the stirring and cooling effect of the auxiliary gas, which provides a feasible way for quality and efficiency improvements in arc additive manufacturing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 383 ◽  
pp. 564-583
Author(s):  
Mohamad Yousef Shaheen ◽  
Anthony R. Thornton ◽  
Stefan Luding ◽  
Thomas Weinhart

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 679-689
Author(s):  
J. Raplee ◽  
J. Gockel ◽  
F. List ◽  
K. Carver ◽  
S. Foster ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document