Infinitely repeated games with public monitoring and monetary transfers

2012 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 1191-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Goldlücke ◽  
Sebastian Kranz
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Games ◽  
Monetary Transfers ◽  
Public Monitoring ◽  
Infinitely Repeated Games

scholarly journals The Impact of Monitoring in Infinitely Repeated Games: Perfect, Public, and Private

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Aoyagi ◽  
V. Bhaskar ◽  
Guillaume R. Fréchette
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Experiment ◽  
Repeated Games ◽  
Imperfect Monitoring ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Private Monitoring ◽  
Stage Game ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Public Monitoring ◽  
Perfect Monitoring ◽  
Infinitely Repeated Games

This paper uses a laboratory experiment to study the effect of the monitoring structure on the play of the infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma. Keeping the strategic form of the stage game fixed, we examine the behavior of subjects when information about past actions is perfect (perfect monitoring), noisy but public (public monitoring), and noisy and private (private monitoring). We find that the subjects sustain cooperation in every treatment, but that their strategies differ across the three treatments. Specifically, the strategies under imperfect monitoring are both more complex and more lenient than those under perfect monitoring. The results show how the changes in strategies across monitoring structures mitigate the effect of noise in monitoring on efficiency. (JEL C72, C73, C92, D82, D83)

Infinitely-repeated games with endogenous discounting

1996 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Neilson ◽  
Harold Winter
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Games ◽  
Endogenous Discounting ◽  
Infinitely Repeated Games

scholarly journals Cooperation between Emotional Players

Games ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Lina Andersson
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Games ◽  
Stochastic Games ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
States Of Mind ◽  
Finitely Repeated Games ◽  
Prisoners Dilemma ◽  
State Of Mind ◽  
Infinitely Repeated Games

This paper uses the framework of stochastic games to propose a model of emotions in repeated interactions. An emotional player can be in either a friendly, a neutral, or a hostile state of mind. The player transitions between the states of mind as a response to observed actions taken by the other player. The state of mind determines the player’s psychological payoff which together with a material payoff constitutes the player’s utility. In the friendly (hostile) state of mind the player has a positive (negative) concern for other players’ material payoffs. This paper shows how emotions can both facilitate and obstruct cooperation in a repeated prisoners’ dilemma game. In finitely repeated games a player who cares only for their own material payoffs can have an incentive to manipulate an emotional player into the friendly state of mind. In infinitely repeated games with two emotional players less patience is required to sustain cooperation. However, emotions can also obstruct cooperation if they make the players unwilling to punish each other, or if the players become hostile when punished.

Private Strategies in Finitely Repeated Games with Imperfect Public Monitoring

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Mailath ◽  
Steven A. Matthews ◽  
Tadashi Sekiguchi
Keyword(s):  
Nash Equilibrium ◽  
Repeated Games ◽  
Finitely Repeated Games ◽  
Game Equilibrium ◽  
Public Signals ◽  
Stage Game ◽  
Public Monitoring ◽  
Public Signal ◽  
Action Profile

We present three examples of finitely repeated games with public monitoring that have sequential equilibria in private strategies, i.e., strategies that depend on own past actions as well as public signals. Such private sequential equilibria can have features quite unlike those of the more familiar perfect public equilibria: (i) making a public signal less informative can create Pareto superior equilibrium outcomes; (ii) the equilibrium final-period action profile need not be a stage game equilibrium; and (iii) even if the stage game has a unique correlated (and hence Nash) equilibrium, the first-period action profile need not be a stage game equilibrium.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document