Charting the future of social psychology on stormy seas: Winners, losers, and recommendations

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy F. Baumeister
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Katja Corcoran ◽  
Michael Häfner ◽  
Mathias Kauff ◽  
Stefan Stürmer

Abstract. In this article, we reflect on 50 years of the journal Social Psychology. We interviewed colleagues who have witnessed the history of the journal. Based on these interviews, we identified three crucial periods in Social Psychology’s history, that are (a) the early development and further professionalization of the journal, (b) the reunification of East and West Germany, and (c) the internationalization of the journal and its transformation from the Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie to Social Psychology. We end our reflection with a discussion of changes that occurred during these periods and their implication for the future of our field.


Author(s):  
Jocelyn Raude ◽  
Marion Debin ◽  
Cécile Souty ◽  
Caroline Guerrisi ◽  
Clement Turbelin ◽  
...  

The recent emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 in China has raised the spectre of a novel, potentially catastrophic pandemic in both scientific and lay communities throughout the world. In this particular context, people have been accused of being excessively pessimistic regarding the future consequences of this emerging health threat. However, consistent with previous research in social psychology, a large survey conducted in Europe in the early stage of the COVID-19 epidemic shows that the majority of respondents was actually overly optimistic about the risk of infection.


1991 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morris Rosenberg ◽  
Cookie W. Stephan ◽  
Walter G. Stephan ◽  
Thomas F. Pettigrew
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Jane Liebert
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Gergen

Jost and Kruglanski (this issue) offer a compelling vision of the professional gains to be derived from a thoroughgoing rapprochement between constructionist and experimental inquiry in social psychology. They effectively establish grounds for dialogue of great importance to the future of the field. While I concur with much that they propose, I would like to make an important distinction between the foundational premises that guide these differing endeavors and the ongoing practices of inquiry. By addressing the ungrounded character of both empiricist and constructionist metatheory, we are better able to explore the pragmatic consequences of the various forms of theory, methods, and politics invited by experimental and constructionist approaches.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document