Detection of false positives with a commonly used Norovirus RT-PCR primer set

2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elke Wollants ◽  
Marc Van Ranst
Keyword(s):  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Bionatura ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1948-1954
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Alvarez ◽  
Mariela Perez-Cardenas ◽  
Marco Gudiño ◽  
Markus P. Tellkamp

RT-PCR is the standard gold technique for testing the presence of RNA of the coronavirus causing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) due to its high specificity and sensitivity. Despite its general use and reliability, no lab in the world is immune to the generation of false positives. These errors cause a loss of confidence in the technique's power and damage the image of laboratories. More importantly, they can take a toll on tested individuals and have economic, psychological, and health-associated effects. Most false positives are caused during a manual operation inside the laboratory. However, not much has been published about the errors associated with particular laboratory techniques used to detect the virus since the beginning of the actual pandemic. This work precisely reflects on events that occur during manual RT-PCR diagnostics in a COVID-19 laboratory, providing tips for reducing false-positive results.


Author(s):  
Manu Vanaerschot ◽  
Sabrina A. Mann ◽  
James T. Webber ◽  
Jack Kamm ◽  
Sidney M. Bell ◽  
...  

AbstractWe identify a mutation in the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 that adversely affects annealing of a commonly used RT-PCR primer; epidemiologic evidence suggests the virus retains pathogenicity and competence for spread. This reinforces the importance of using multiple targets, preferably in at least 2 genes, for robust SARS-CoV-2 detection.Article Summary LineA SARS-CoV-2 variant that occurs worldwide and has spread in California significantly affects diagnostic sensitivity of an N gene assay, highlighting the need to employ multiple viral targets for detection.


2010 ◽  
Vol 168 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 242-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Komorowska ◽  
T. Malinowski ◽  
L. Michalczuk

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Kiyasu ◽  
Yuto Takeuchi ◽  
Yusaku Akashi ◽  
Daisuke Kato ◽  
Miwa Kuwahara ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroductionAntigen testing may help screen for and detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in asymptomatic individuals. However, limited data regarding the diagnostic performance of antigen tests for this group are available.MethodsWe used clinical samples to prospectively evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the antigen test QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag. This study was conducted at a PCR center between October 7, 2020 and January 9, 2021. Two nasopharyngeal samples per patient were obtained with flocked swabs; one was used for the antigen test, and the other for real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The diagnostic performance of the antigen test was compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, and the RT-PCR results were used as a reference.ResultsAmong the 1,934 collected samples, SARS-CoV-2 was detected by real-time RT-PCR in 188 (9.7%); 76 (40.4%) of these samples were from asymptomatic individuals. Over half of the total samples (1,073; 55.5%) were obtained from asymptomatic volunteers. The sensitivity of the antigen test was significantly lower for asymptomatic group than for symptomatic patients (67.1% vs 89.3%, p < 0.001). The specificity was 100% for both groups, and no false positives were observed among all 1,934 samples. The median Ct value for the asymptomatic group was significantly higher than that of the symptomatic group (24 vs 20, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag showed a lower sensitivity for asymptomatic group than for symptomatic patients. However, its specificity was consistently high, and no false positives were found in this study.


2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Johnson ◽  
George D. Di Giovanni ◽  
Paul A. Rochelle

ABSTRACTThis study compared the three most commonly used assays for detectingCryptosporidiumsp. infections in cell culture: immunofluorescent antibody and microscopy assay (IFA), PCR targetingCryptosporidiumsp.-specific DNA, and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) targetingCryptosporidiumsp.-specific mRNA. Monolayers of HCT-8 cells, grown in 8-well chamber slides or 96-well plates, were inoculated with a variety of viable and inactivated oocysts to assess assay performance. All assays detected infection with low doses of flow cytometry-enumeratedCryptosporidium parvumoocysts, including infection with one oocyst and three oocysts. All methods also detected infection withCryptosporidium hominis. The RT-PCR assay, IFA, and PCR assay detected infection in 23%, 25%, and 51% of monolayers inoculated with threeC. parvumoocysts and 10%, 9%, and 16% of monolayers inoculated with one oocyst, respectively. The PCR assay was the most sensitive, but it had the highest frequency of false positives with mock-infected cells and inactivated oocysts. IFA was the only infection detection assay that did not produce false positives with mock-infected monolayers. IFA was also the only assay that detected infections in all experiments with spiked oocysts recovered from Envirochek capsules following filtration of 1,000 liters of treated water. Consequently, cell culture with IFA detection is the most appropriate method for routine and sensitive detection of infectiousCryptosporidium parvumandCryptosporidium hominisin drinking water.


2006 ◽  
Vol 134 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 130-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyne Guévremont ◽  
Julie Brassard ◽  
Alain Houde ◽  
Carole Simard ◽  
Yvon-Louis Trottier

2021 ◽  
pp. 114197
Author(s):  
Ahalieyah Anantharajah ◽  
Raphael Helaers ◽  
Jean-Philippe Defour ◽  
Nathalie Olive ◽  
Florence Kabera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rt Pcr ◽  

Author(s):  
Andrew N. Cohen ◽  
Bruce Kessel

AbstractBackgroundLarge-scale testing for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR is a key element of the response to COVID-19, but little attention has been paid to the potential frequency and impacts of false positives.MethodsFrom a meta-analysis of external quality assessments of RT-PCR assays of RNA viruses, we derived a conservative estimate of the range of false positive rates that can reasonably be expected in SARS-CoV-2 testing, and analyzed the effect of such rates on analyses of regional test data and estimates of population prevalence and asymptomatic ratio.FindingsReview of external quality assessments revealed false positive rates of 0-16.7%, with an interquartile range of 0.8-4.0%. Such rates would have large impacts on test data when prevalence is low. Inclusion of such rates significantly alters four published analyses of population prevalence and asymptomatic ratio.InterpretationThe high false discovery rate that results, when prevalence is low, from false positive rates typical of RT-PCR assays of RNA viruses raises questions about the usefulness of mass testing; and indicates that across a broad range of likely prevalences, positive test results are more likely to be wrong than are negative results, contrary to public health advice about SARS-CoV-2 testing. There are myriad clinical and case management implications. Failure to appreciate the potential frequency of false positives and the consequent unreliability of positive test results across a range of scenarios could unnecessarily remove critical workers from service, expose uninfected individuals to greater risk of infection, delay or impede appropriate medical treatment, lead to inappropriate treatment, degrade patient care, waste personal protective equipment, waste human resources in unnecessary contact tracing, hinder the development of clinical improvements, and weaken clinical trials. Measures to raise awareness of false positives, reduce their frequency, and mitigate their effects should be considered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s8-s9
Author(s):  
Chanu Rhee ◽  
Meghan Baker ◽  
Sanjat Kanjilal ◽  
Robert Tucker ◽  
Vineeta Vaidya ◽  
...  

Group Name: CDC Prevention Epicenters Program Background: Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests are the reference standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection, but false positives can occur and viral RNA may persist for weeks-to-months following recovery. Isolating such patients increases pressure on limited hospital resources and may impede care. Therefore, we quantified the percentage of patients who tested positive by RT-PCR yet were unlikely to be infectious and could be released from isolation. Methods: We prospectively identified all adults hospitalized at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Boston, MA) who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR (primarily Hologic Panther Fusion or Cepheid Xpert platforms) between December 24, 2020, and January 24, 2021. Each case was assessed by infection control staff for possible discontinuation of isolation using an algorithm that incorporated the patient’s prior history of COVID-19, current symptoms, RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values, repeat RT-PCR testing at least 24 hours later, and SARS-CoV-2 serologies (Figure 1). Results: Overall, 246 hospitalized patients (median age, 66 years [interquartile range, 50–74]; 131 [53.3%] male) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR during the study period. Of these, 201 (81.7%) were deemed new diagnoses of active disease on the basis of low Ct values and/or progressive symptoms. Moreover, 44 patients (17.9%) were deemed noninfectious: 35 (14.2%) had prior known resolved infections (n = 21) or unknown prior infection but positive serology (n = 14), high Ct values on initial testing, and negative or stably high Ct values on repeat testing. Also, 5 (2.0%) had recent infection but >10 days had passed since symptom onset and they were clinically improving. In addition, 4 (1.6%) results were deemed false positives based on lack of symptoms and at least 1 negative repeat RT-PCR test (Figure 2). One patient was asymptomatic with Ct value <35 but was discharged before further testing could be obtained. Among the 44 noninfectious patients, isolation was discontinued a median of 3 days (IQR, 2–4) after the first positive test. We did not identify any healthcare worker infections attributable to early discontinuation of isolation in these patients. Conclusions: During the winter COVID-19 second surge in Massachusetts, nearly 1 in 5 hospitalized patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR were deemed noninfectious and eligible for discontinuation of precautions. Most of these cases were consistent with residual RNA from prior known or undiagnosed infections. Active assessments of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests by infection control practitioners using clinical data, Ct values, repeat tests, and serologies can safely validate the release many patients from isolation and thereby conserve resources and facilitate patient care.Funding: NoDisclosures: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document