scholarly journals A single-exponential fixed-parameter algorithm for distance-hereditary vertex deletion

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 121-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduard Eiben ◽  
Robert Ganian ◽  
O-joung Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Vertex Deletion ◽  
Fixed Parameter ◽  
Fixed Parameter Algorithm ◽  
Single Exponential

Multiplicative Parameterization Above a Guarantee

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Fedor V. Fomin ◽  
Petr A. Golovach ◽  
Daniel Lokshtanov ◽  
Fahad Panolan ◽  
Saket Saurabh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Size ◽  
Input Graph ◽  
Fixed Parameter Tractable ◽  
Long Cycle ◽  
Fixed Parameter ◽  
Parameterized Problem ◽  
Fixed Constant ◽  
Fixed Parameter Algorithm ◽  
Np Hardness ◽  
Additive Form

Parameterization above a guarantee is a successful paradigm in Parameterized Complexity. To the best of our knowledge, all fixed-parameter tractable problems in this paradigm share an additive form defined as follows. Given an instance ( I,k ) of some (parameterized) problem π with a guarantee g(I) , decide whether I admits a solution of size at least (or at most) k + g(I) . Here, g(I) is usually a lower bound on the minimum size of a solution. Since its introduction in 1999 for M AX SAT and M AX C UT (with g(I) being half the number of clauses and half the number of edges, respectively, in the input), analysis of parameterization above a guarantee has become a very active and fruitful topic of research. We highlight a multiplicative form of parameterization above (or, rather, times) a guarantee: Given an instance ( I,k ) of some (parameterized) problem π with a guarantee g(I) , decide whether I admits a solution of size at least (or at most) k · g(I) . In particular, we study the Long Cycle problem with a multiplicative parameterization above the girth g(I) of the input graph, which is the most natural guarantee for this problem, and provide a fixed-parameter algorithm. Apart from being of independent interest, this exemplifies how parameterization above a multiplicative guarantee can arise naturally. We also show that, for any fixed constant ε > 0, multiplicative parameterization above g(I) 1+ε of Long Cycle yields para-NP-hardness, thus our parameterization is tight in this sense. We complement our main result with the design (or refutation of the existence) of fixed-parameter algorithms as well as kernelization algorithms for additional problems parameterized multiplicatively above girth.

A fixed-parameter algorithm for the maximum agreement forest problem on multifurcating trees

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Shi ◽  
Jianxin Wang ◽  
Yufei Yang ◽  
Qilong Feng ◽  
Weilong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Agreement Forest ◽  
Fixed Parameter ◽  
Fixed Parameter Algorithm

Fixed-Parameter Algorithms for Cluster Vertex Deletion

2008 ◽  
pp. 711-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Falk Hüffner ◽  
Christian Komusiewicz ◽  
Hannes Moser ◽  
Rolf Niedermeier
Keyword(s):  
Vertex Deletion ◽  
Fixed Parameter

scholarly journals A fixed-parameter algorithm for guarding 1.5D terrains

2015 ◽  
Vol 595 ◽  
pp. 130-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farnoosh Khodakarami ◽  
Farzad Didehvar ◽  
Ali Mohades
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Parameter ◽  
Fixed Parameter Algorithm

A fixed-parameter algorithm for the directed feedback vertex set problem

2008 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianer Chen ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Songjian Lu ◽  
Barry O'sullivan ◽  
Igor Razgon
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Vertex Set ◽  
Fixed Parameter ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Feedback Vertex Set Problem ◽  
Fixed Parameter Algorithm ◽  
Directed Feedback Vertex Set

scholarly journals Read-Based Phasing of Related Individuals

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilpa Garg ◽  
Marcel Martin ◽  
Tobias Marschall
Keyword(s):  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Theoretical Framework ◽  
Mendelian Inheritance ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Fixed Parameter ◽  
Related Individuals ◽  
Fixed Parameter Algorithm ◽  
Multiple Variants ◽  
Better Than

Motivation: Read-based phasing deduces the haplotypes of an individual from sequencing reads that cover multiple variants, while genetic phasing takes only genotypes as input and applies the rules of Mendelian inheritance to infer haplotypes within a pedigree of individuals. Combining both into an approach that uses these two independent sources of information -- reads and pedigree -- has the potential to deliver results better than each individually. Results: We provide a theoretical framework combining read-based phasing with genetic haplotyping, and describe a fixed-parameter algorithm and its implementation for finding an optimal solution. We show that leveraging reads of related individuals jointly in this way yields more phased variants and at a higher accuracy than when phased separately, both in simulated and real data. Coverages as low as 2x for each member of a trio yield haplotypes that are as accurate as when analyzed separately at 15x coverage per individual.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document