scholarly journals Quality characteristics of northern-style Chinese steamed bread prepared from soft red winter wheat flours with waxy wheat flour substitution

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengyun Ma ◽  
Taehyun Ji ◽  
Byung-Kee Baik
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Wheat Flour ◽  
Quality Characteristics ◽  
Waxy Wheat ◽  
Chinese Steamed Bread ◽  
Soft Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Steamed Bread ◽  
Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Wheat Flours

Effect of Waxy Wheat Flour Blends on the Quality of Chinese Steamed Bread

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 1275-1282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng QIN ◽  
Shun-he CHENG ◽  
Chuan-xi MA
Keyword(s):  
Wheat Flour ◽  
Waxy Wheat ◽  
Chinese Steamed Bread ◽  
Steamed Bread ◽  
Flour Blends

Effect of Preripe Harvest and Artificial Drying on the Milling and Baking Quality of Soft Red Winter Wheat 1

Crop Science ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen W. Kirlies ◽  
Thomas L. Housley ◽  
Abdallah M. Emam ◽  
Fred L. Patterson ◽  
Martin R. Okos
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Baking Quality ◽  
Soft Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

Evaluation of Soft Red Winter Wheat Forage Yield, Nutritive Value and Tetany Hazard as Influenced by Sampling Date and Nitrogen Fertilization

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Clayton R. Bailey ◽  
Lathan B. Daniels ◽  
Wayne K. Coblentz ◽  
Elizabeth B. Kegley ◽  
Levi J. McBeth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilization ◽  
Nutritive Value ◽  
Forage Yield ◽  
Soft Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

‘GA JT141‐14E45’: A new soft red winter wheat cultivar adapted to Georgia and the U.S. Southeast region

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mergoum ◽  
Jerry W. Johnson ◽  
James W. Buck ◽  
Steve Sutton ◽  
Benjamin Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Wheat Cultivar ◽  
Winter Wheat Cultivar ◽  
Southeast Region ◽  
Soft Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Red Winter Wheat ◽  
The U.S

scholarly journals Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Triazole-Based Fungicides on Wheat Yield and Test Weight as Influenced by Fusarium Head Blight Intensity

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Paul ◽  
M. P. McMullen ◽  
D. E. Hershman ◽  
L. V. Madden
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Fusarium Head Blight ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Test Weight ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Yield Response ◽  
Head Blight ◽  
Yield Increase ◽  
Soft Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

Multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were conducted on 12 years of data from 14 U.S. states to determine the mean yield and test-weight responses of wheat to treatment with propiconazole, prothioconazole, tebuconazole, metconazole, and prothioconazole+tebuconazole. All fungicides led to a significant increase in mean yield and test weight relative to the check (D; P < 0.001). Metconazole resulted in the highest overall yield increase, with a D of 450 kg/ha, followed by prothioconazole+tebuconazole (444.5 kg/ha), prothioconazole (419.1 kg/ha), tebuconazole (272.6 kg/ha), and propiconazole (199.6 kg/ha). Metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole also resulted in the highest increases in test weight, with D values of 17.4 to 19.4 kg/m3, respectively. On a relative scale, the best three fungicides resulted in an overall 13.8 to 15.0% increase in yield but only a 2.5 to 2.8% increase in test weight. Except for prothioconazole+tebuconazole, wheat type significantly affected the yield response to treatment; depending on the fungicide, D was 110.0 to 163.7 kg/ha higher in spring than in soft-red winter wheat. Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease index (field or plot-level severity) in the untreated check plots, a measure of the risk of disease development in a study, had a significant effect on the yield response to treatment, in that D increased with increasing FHB index. The probability was estimated that fungicide treatment in a randomly selected study will result in a positive yield increase (p+) and increases of at least 250 and 500 kg/ha (p250 and p500, respectively). For the three most effective fungicide treatments (metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole) at the higher selected FHB index, p+ was very large (e.g., ≥0.99 for both wheat types) but p500 was considerably lower (e.g., 0.78 to 0.92 for spring and 0.54 to 0.68 for soft-red winter wheat); at the lower FHB index, p500 for the same three fungicides was 0.34 to 0.36 for spring and only 0.09 to 0.23 for soft-red winter wheat.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document