Lateral sinus floor elevation without grafting materials. Individual- and aggregate-data meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1616-1624
Author(s):  
Victor Dongo ◽  
Nadine von Krockow ◽  
Paulo Ricardo Saquete Martins-Filho ◽  
Paul Weigl
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Aggregate Data ◽  
Lateral Sinus ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Grafting Materials

Axial Triangle of the Maxillary Sinus, and its Surgical Implication With the Position of Maxillary Sinus Septa During Sinus Floor Elevation: A CBCT Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-422
Author(s):  
Junho Jung ◽  
Jung Soo Park ◽  
Seoung-Jin Hong ◽  
Gyu-Tae Kim ◽  
Yong-Dae Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Lateral Sinus ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Molar Region

The aim of this study was to measure the convexity of the lateral wall of the maxillary (Mx) sinus and identify the locational distribution of antral septa in relation to the zygomaticomaxillary buttress (ZMB), in order to suggest another anatomical consideration and surgical modification of sinus floor elevation procedures. This study was designed as a cross-sectional study, and a total of 134 patients and 161 sinuses containing edentulous alveolar ridges were analyzed. The angle between the anterior and lateral walls of the Mx sinus (lateral sinus angle [LSA]), and the angle between the midpalatal line and the anterior sinus wall (anterior sinus angle [ASA]) were measured. Mean LSAs and ASAs were 105.9° ± 9.86° and 58.4° ± 6.43°, respectively. No significant difference between left and right sides was found (LSA, P = .420; right = 105.5° ± 9.27°; left = 105.5° ± 9.27° and ASA, P = .564; right = 57.9° ± 6.80°; left = 58.8° ± 6.02°). The prevalence of septa was 37.3%, and it was most frequently noted in the second molar region (32.8%), followed by the first molar (20.9%), retromolar (16.4%), and second premolar regions (14.9%). Septa were most frequently located posterior to the ZMB (49.2%), while ZMB was mostly located in the first molar region (66.4%). Narrow LSAs may complicate the surgical approach to the posterior maxilla, especially when sinus elevation should be used in the second molar region. Considering the occasional presence of antral septa, membrane elevation may be complicated when a septum is encountered during the procedure. These results suggest that 3-dimensional examination of the convexity of the Mx sinus should be performed preoperatively to choose proper surgical techniques and minimize surgical complications.

scholarly journals Patient‐reported outcomes and complication rates after lateral sinus floor elevation

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (S19) ◽  
pp. 431-431
Author(s):  
Carlo Rengo ◽  
Antonino Fiorino ◽  
Paolo Calamai ◽  
Alessandro Cucchi ◽  
Emanuele Randellini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Lateral Sinus ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Sinus Floor

scholarly journals Graft-Free Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 550-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deng-Hui Duan ◽  
Jia-Hui Fu ◽  
Wei Qi ◽  
Yi Du ◽  
Jie Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

Use of a titanium device in lateral sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in monkeys

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Schweikert ◽  
Daniele Botticelli ◽  
José Américo de Oliveira ◽  
Alessandro Scala ◽  
Luiz A. Salata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Lateral Sinus ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Sinus Floor
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document