Donor site morbidity and quality of life after microvascular head and neck reconstruction with free fibula and deep-circumflex iliac artery flaps

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Schardt ◽  
Angela Schmid ◽  
Jens Bodem ◽  
Johannes Krisam ◽  
Jürgen Hoffmann ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ferri ◽  
E. Segna ◽  
A. Varazzani ◽  
C. Copelli ◽  
S. Valsecchi ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia R. Albornoz ◽  
Andrea L. Pusic ◽  
Patrick Reavey ◽  
Amie M. Scott ◽  
Anne F. Klassen ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 874-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Bozec ◽  
Gilles Poissonnet ◽  
Emmanuel Chamorey ◽  
Cédric Casanova ◽  
Jacques Vallicioni ◽  
...  

Microsurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 447-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvano Ferrari ◽  
Andrea Ferri ◽  
Bernardo Bianchi ◽  
Andrea Varazzani ◽  
Giuseppe Perlangeli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (06) ◽  
pp. 715-721
Author(s):  
Weitao Wang ◽  
Tom Shokri ◽  
Aurora Vincent ◽  
Allison Vest ◽  
Fayette Williams ◽  
...  

AbstractRehabilitation of head and neck defects following trauma, oncologic resection, or congenital malformation is a challenging task. Not only is the restoration of three-dimensional form necessary for acceptable cosmesis, but simultaneous restoration of functional speech and swallow is also essential for optimal reconstruction outcomes. While advances in free tissue transfer have allowed surgical reconstruction of head and neck defects once considered inoperable and associated with poor quality of life, not all patients are ideal surgical candidates. As such, nonsurgical solutions to both functional and cosmetic restoration remain a necessary alternative option. Facial prostheses and palatomaxillary obturators have evolved with increasingly biocompatible materials as well as retention systems to address significant defects that challenge the limits of surgical reconstruction.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin D. Batstone ◽  
Carly M. Fox ◽  
Mary E. Dingley ◽  
C. Peter Cornelius

Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck is a widespread procedure. The aesthetic outcome is frequently compromised by color mismatch between the donor site skin and the complex pigmentation of the face. Various surgical procedures have been described to improve the appearance of external skin paddles. Medical tattooing is commonly used for nipple pigmentation in breast reconstruction and cosmetic procedures such as permanent makeup. This article describes the technique and its application to head and neck reconstruction. Medical tattooing can be used to improve the cosmetic appearance of head and neck free flaps. There is no donor site morbidity and subtle changes in color can be replicated. The article describes the technique of medical tattooing with the use of illustrative cases. Medical tattooing is a viable alternative for improving the appearance of cutaneous skin paddles following head and neck reconstruction with free flaps. Its advantages include no donor site morbidity, availability of an infinite range of colors, no requirement for general anesthesia, and the ability to use multiple colors in the one flap for complex pigmentation requirements. Its disadvantages include the need for specialized skills and equipment and the fading of color over time.


Author(s):  
Mark K. Wax ◽  
Larry L. Myers ◽  
Peter E. Andersen ◽  
James I. Cohen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document