Variability in palatal shape and size in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate assessed using dense surface model construction and 3D geometric morphometrics

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Šárka Bejdová ◽  
Václav Krajíček ◽  
Miroslav Peterka ◽  
Pavel Trefný ◽  
Jana Velemínská
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Morphometrics ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Model Construction ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
3D Geometric Morphometrics ◽  
Shape And Size

scholarly journals Morphometric analysis of craniofacial features in mono- and dizygotic twins discordant for unilateral cleft lip and palate

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 878-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Y. Tessler ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi ◽  
James A. McNamara ◽  
Tiziano Baccetti
Keyword(s):  
Thin Plate ◽  
Morphometric Analysis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Morphological Similarity ◽  
Craniofacial Skeleton ◽  
Dizygotic Twins ◽  
Craniofacial Features ◽  
Mz Twins ◽  
Shape And Size

Abstract Objective: To compare craniofacial differences between twins discordant for surgically repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) during the developmental ages and to test the effect of zygosity on the shape and size of the craniofacial skeleton of the same twins by means of thin plate spline (TPS) analysis. Materials and Methods: Lateral and posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric films from 19 sets of monozygotic (MZ) twins (15 male and 4 female) and 10 dizygotic (DZ) twins (7 male and 3 female) were analyzed. TPS analysis evaluated statistically significant differences in the craniofacial shape and size between affected and unaffected twins within MZ and DZ twin couples. Results: No statistically significant differences in craniofacial shape or size between CLP and non-CLP MZ or DZ twins were observed. The level of morphological similarity in CLP vs non-CLP MZ twins was statistically greater than in DZ twins. Conclusions: Morphometric analysis showed that surgically repaired CLP does not produce significant shape or size differences in the craniofacial features of MZ or DZ twins discordant for unilateral CLP.

Treating Velopharyngeal Inadequacy Using Bilateral Buccal Flap Revision Palatoplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 878-892
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Napoli ◽  
Linda D. Vallino
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Buccal Flap

Purpose The 2 most commonly used operations to treat velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) are superiorly based pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty, both of which may result in hyponasal speech and airway obstruction. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe the bilateral buccal flap revision palatoplasty (BBFRP) as an alternative technique to manage VPI while minimizing these risks and (b) conduct a systematic review of the evidence of BBFRP on speech and other clinical outcomes. A report comparing the speech of a child with hypernasality before and after BBFRP is presented. Method A review of databases was conducted for studies of buccal flaps to treat VPI. Using the principles of a systematic review, the articles were read, and data were abstracted for study characteristics that were developed a priori. With respect to the case report, speech and instrumental data from a child with repaired cleft lip and palate and hypernasal speech were collected and analyzed before and after surgery. Results Eight articles were included in the analysis. The results were positive, and the evidence is in favor of BBFRP in improving velopharyngeal function, while minimizing the risk of hyponasal speech and obstructive sleep apnea. Before surgery, the child's speech was characterized by moderate hypernasality, and after surgery, it was judged to be within normal limits. Conclusion Based on clinical experience and results from the systematic review, there is sufficient evidence that the buccal flap is effective in improving resonance and minimizing obstructive sleep apnea. We recommend BBFRP as another approach in selected patients to manage VPI. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9919352

Orthodontic Management Of The Cleft Lip And Palate Patient

1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro A. Figueroa ◽  
John W. Polley ◽  
Mimis Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Palate Patient

Cleft lip and palate care in the UK: the CSAG report

BDJ ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 185 (7) ◽  
pp. 320-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biase Di ◽  
A Markus
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
The Uk

Precision of Landmark Positioning on Digitized Models from Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Brief ◽  
Jan Behle ◽  
Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer ◽  
Stefan Hassfeld
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate

Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airway in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate - a Long-term Study

2009 ◽  
pp. 091202121239062
Author(s):  
Maria Mani ◽  
Staffan Morén ◽  
Ornolfur Thorvardsson ◽  
Olafur Jakobsson ◽  
Valdemar Skoog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Nasal Airway ◽  
Term Study ◽  
Long Term Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document