Estimating water treatment plants costs using factor analysis and artificial neural networks

2016 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 4540-4549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Marzouk ◽  
Mostafa Elkadi
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Artificial Neural Networks ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Water Treatment Plants ◽  
Artificial Neural

Development of artificial neural networks based confidence intervals and response surfaces for the optimization of coagulation performance

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1079-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. McArthur ◽  
Robert C. Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Artificial Neural Networks ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Response Surfaces ◽  
Average Interval ◽  
Squared Error ◽  
Interval Width ◽  
Artificial Neural

Effective coagulation is essential to achieving drinking water treatment objectives when considering surface water. To minimize settled water turbidity, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been adopted to predict optimum alum and carbon dioxide dosages at the Elgin Area Water Treatment Plant. ANNs were applied to predict both optimum carbon dioxide and alum dosages with correlation (R2) values of 0.68 and 0.90, respectively. ANNs were also used to developed surface response plots to ease optimum selection of dosage. Trained ANNs were used to predict turbidity outcomes for a range of alum and carbon dioxide dosages and these were compared to historical data. Point-wise confidence intervals were obtained based on error and squared error values during the training process. The probability of the true value falling within the predicted interval ranged from 0.25 to 0.81 and the average interval width ranged from 0.15 to 0.62 NTU. Training an ANN using the squared error produced a larger average interval width, but better probability of a true prediction interval.

Drinking water quality and treatment: the use of artificial neural networks

2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (S1) ◽  
pp. 26-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
C W Baxter ◽  
Q Zhang ◽  
S J Stanley ◽  
R Shariff ◽  
R -RT Tupas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Artificial Neural Networks ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Process Control ◽  
Treatment Process ◽  
Drinking Water Treatment ◽  
Water Treatment Process ◽  
Artificial Neural

To improve drinking water quality while reducing operating costs, many drinking water utilities are investing in advanced process control and automation technologies. The use of artificial intelligence technologies, specifically artificial neural networks, is increasing in the drinking water treatment industry as they allow for the development of robust nonlinear models of complex unit processes. This paper highlights the utility of artificial neural networks in water quality modelling as well as drinking water treatment process modelling and control through the presentation of several case studies at two large-scale water treatment plants in Edmonton, Alberta.Key words: artificial neural networks, water treatment process control, water treatment modelling.

scholarly journals A framework for the use of artificial neural networks for water treatment: development and application

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 3301-3317
Author(s):  
Rafael Paulino ◽  
Pierre Bérubé
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Artificial Neural Networks ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Distribution System ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Drinking Water Treatment ◽  
Model Complex ◽  
Artificial Neural ◽  
Uv Transmittance

Abstract Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are increasingly being used in water treatment applications because of their ability to model complex systems. The present study proposed a framework to develop and validate ANNs for drinking water treatment and distribution system water quality applications. The framework was used to develop ANNs to identify the optimal ozone dose required for effective UV disinfection and to meet regulatory requirements for disinfection by-products (DBPs) in the distribution system. Treatment at a full-scale treatment plant was successfully modelled, with treated water UV transmittance as the output variable. ANNs could be used to identify operating setpoints that minimize operating costs for effective disinfection during drinking water treatment. However, because of the limited data available to train and validate the distribution system ANNs (i.e. n = 48; 15 years of quarterly measurements), these could not be used to reliably identify operating setpoints that also ensure compliance with DBP regulations.

scholarly journals Modeling of Chlorine and Coagulant Dose in a Water Treatment Plant by Artificial Neural Networks

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 4176-4181
Author(s):  
A. S. Kote ◽  
D. V. Wadkar
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Artificial Neural Networks ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Water Treatment Plant ◽  
Feed Forward Neural Network ◽  
Feed Forward ◽  
Dose Model ◽  
Artificial Neural

Coagulation and chlorination are complex processes of a water treatment plant (WTP). Determination of coagulant and chlorine dose is time-consuming. Many times WTP operators in India determine the coagulant and chlorine dose approximately using their experience, which may lead to the use of excess or insufficient dose. Hence, there is a need to develop prediction models to determine optimum chlorine and coagulant doses. In this paper, artificial neural networks (ANN) are used for prediction due to their ability to learn and model non-linear and complex relationships. Separate ANN models for chlorine and coagulant doses are explored with radial basis neural network (RBFNN), feed-forward neural network (FFNN), cascade feed forward neural network (CFNN) and generalized regression neural network (GRNN). For modeling, daily water quality data of the last four years are collected from the plant laboratory of WTP in Maharashtra (India). In order to improve performance, these models are established by varying input variables, hidden nodes, training functions, spread factor, and epochs. The best models are selected based on the comparison of performance measures. It is observed that the best performing chlorine dose model using defined statistics is found to be RBFNN with R=0.999. Similarly, the CFNN coagulant dose model with Bayesian regularization (BR) training function provided excellent estimates with network architecture (2-40-1) and R=0.947. Based on the above models, two graphical user interfaces (GUIs) were developed for real-time prediction of chlorine and coagulant dose, which will be useful for plant operators and decision makers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document