scholarly journals Is There a Place for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Previous Coronary Bypass Grafting?

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (20) ◽  
pp. 2144-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadi J. Sawaya ◽  
Ole De Backer
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Coronary Bypass ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Coronary Bypass Grafting

Comparing Performance of Risk Scores for Combined Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1118-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Kai Ming Wang ◽  
David H.M. Choi ◽  
Tharumenthiran Ramanathan ◽  
Peter N. Ruygrok
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Coronary Bypass ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Bypass Grafting

The Safety of Combined Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Bypass Grafting

1973 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Anderson ◽  
Lawrence I. Bonchek ◽  
James A. Wood ◽  
Richard P. Chapman ◽  
Albert Starr
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Coronary Bypass ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Bypass Grafting

scholarly journals Aortic valve function post-replacement of severe aortic stenosis by transcatheter procedure versus surgery: a systematic review and metanalysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charbel Abi Khalil ◽  
Barbara Ignatiuk ◽  
Guliz Erdem ◽  
Hiam Chemaitelly ◽  
Fabio Barilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Paravalvular Leak ◽  
Effective Orifice Area ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Heart Valve

AbstractTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has shown to reduce mortality compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR). However, it is unknown which procedure is associated with better post-procedural valvular function. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that compared TAVR to sAVR for at least 2 years. The primary outcome was post-procedural patient-prosthesis-mismatch (PPM). Secondary outcomes were post-procedural and 2-year: effective orifice area (EOA), paravalvular gradient (PVG) and moderate/severe paravalvular leak (PVL). We identified 6 trials with a total of 7022 participants with severe aortic stenosis. TAVR was associated with 37% (95% CI [0.51–0.78) mean RR reduction of post-procedural PPM, a decrease that was not affected by the surgical risk at inclusion, neither by the transcatheter heart valve system. Postprocedural changes in gradient and EOA were also in favor of TAVR as there was a pooled mean difference decrease of 0.56 (95% CI [0.73–0.38]) in gradient and an increase of 0.47 (95% CI [0.38–0.56]) in EOA. Additionally, self-expandable valves were associated with a higher decrease in gradient than balloon ones (beta = 0.38; 95% CI [0.12–0.64]). However, TAVR was associated with a higher risk of moderate/severe PVL (pooled RR: 9.54, 95% CI [5.53–16.46]). All results were sustainable at 2 years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document