scholarly journals Predictors for New-Onset Complete Heart Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Bleiziffer ◽  
Hendrik Ruge ◽  
Jürgen Hörer ◽  
Andrea Hutter ◽  
Sarah Geisbüsch ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. B224-B225
Author(s):  
Arun K. Kanmanthareddy ◽  
Avanija R. Buddam ◽  
Suresh Sharma ◽  
Ajay Vallakati ◽  
Muhammad R. Afzal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.S Arri ◽  
A Myat ◽  
I Malik ◽  
N Curzen ◽  
A Baumbach ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction New onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most common conduction disturbance associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). It has been shown to adversely affect cardiac function and increase re-hospitalisation, although its impact on mortality remains contentious. Methods We conducted an observational cohort analysis of all TAVI procedures performed by 13 heart teams in the United Kingdom from inception of their structural programmes until 31st July 2013. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 30 days and need for a post-TAVI permanent pacemaker (PPM). Results 1785 patients were eligible for inclusion to the study. The primary analysis cohort was composed of 1409 patients with complete electrocardiographic (ECG) data pre- and post-TAVI. Pre-existing LBBB was present in 200 (14.2%) patients. New LBBB occurred in 323 (22.9%) patients post TAVI, which resolved in 99 (7%) patients prior to discharge. A balloon-expandable device was implanted in 968 (69%) patients, whilst 421 (30%) patients received a self-expandable valve. New LBBB was observed in 120 (12.4%) and 192 (45.6%) patients receiving a balloon- or self-expandable prosthesis respectively. Overall 1-year all-cause mortality post TAVI was 18.7%. New onset LBBB was not associated with an increase in 1-year all-cause mortality (p=0.416). Factors that were associated with mortality included an increasing logistic EuroScore (p=0.05), history of previous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (p=0.001), renal impairment (p=0.003), previous myocardial infarction with pre-existing LBBB (p=0.028) and atrial fibrillation (p=0.039). Lower baseline peak and mean AV gradients were also associated with greater mortality at 1 year (p=0.001), likely reflecting underlying left ventricular dysfunction. In the majority of patients, LVEF remained unchanged following TAVI. Interestingly, the presence or absence of new onset LBBB did not affect LVEF improvement at 30 days. 10% of patients required a PPM post TAVI. Predictors of PPM included new LBBB (OR 2.6, p<0.001), pre-TAVI left ventricular systolic impairment (OR 1.2, p=0.037), a self-expandable device (p<0.001), and pre-existing RBBB (OR 4.0, p<0.001). Conclusions These findings suggest that new onset LBBB post TAVI does not increase mortality at 1 year or adversely affect LVEF at 30 days. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Kanmanthareddy ◽  
Madhu Reddy ◽  
Venkata S Koripalli ◽  
Avanija Buddam ◽  
Nivedita Adabala ◽  
...  

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Data comparing the occurrence of AF after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is unknown. Methods: We identified all studies reporting outcomes after TAVI in all available electronic databases. Meta-analysis of all the studies was performed using random effects model to a) evaluate the incidence of AF and b) compare the incidence of AF between TAVI and SAVR. Results: The incidence of AF was reported in 7 studies, 5 prospective observational studies and 2 randomized controlled studies. The cumulative event rate for new onset AF at 30 days after TAVI was 0.1 (95% CI; 0.06 -0.17). Three studies reported incidence of AF after TAVI and SAVR. The odds ratio (OR) of developing new onset AF with TAVI compared to SAVR was 0.3 (95% CI; 0.10 - 0.88) at 30 days. One year outcome of new onset AF was reported in only two studies. Although, the incidence of AF was lower in the TAVI group, this did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.7, 95% CI; 0.46 -1.07). Conclusion: The incidence of new onset AF after TAVI is 10% within the first 30 days. This risk is 70% lower in patients undergoing TAVI compared to SAVR. The impact of AF after TAVI in terms of stroke, mortality and future recurrences of AF are unknown. Further studies are therefore necessary to study these outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document