Summary of Evidence-Based Practices for Bloodstream Infection Prevention Across the Health Care Continuum of Care for Vascular Access Clinicians: Addressing the 3 Common Sources of Health Care-Associated Infection Transmission

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Hudson Garrett
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Environment ◽  
Core Element

Abstract Infection prevention and control is a core element of patient safety and in the reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infections. These deadly infections can cause a mortality rate of approximately 12%–25% in inpatient populations. Bloodstream infections can in many cases be prevented through the adoption of evidence-based standards from organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Association for Vascular Access. Vascular access professionals play a critical role in infection prevention in patient care by practicing frequent hand hygiene, maintaining a clean and sanitary clinical environment of care, and performing proper skin antisepsis before the insertion of a vascular access catheter. Each of these interventions contributes to the overall goal of eliminating central line-associated bloodstream infections in these very vulnerable patients.

scholarly journals 806. Decreasing Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections Through Quality Improvement Initiative on a High Acuity Transplant Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S446-S446
Author(s):  
Katie Ip ◽  
Leah M Shayer ◽  
susan m lerner ◽  
Leona Kim-Schluger ◽  
Jang Moon
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Vascular Access Devices ◽  
High Acuity ◽  
Clabsi Rate

Abstract Background Central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) have a significant impact on mortality, morbidity and length of stay. Data collected by the Infection Prevention Department revealed progressive increases in the rate of CLABSI on an Abdominal Transplant Unit. Recognizing a drift from best practice, front line staff, the IP team and vascular access specialists, collaborated to identify opportunities for improving care of patients with vascular access devices. Methods An increase in CLABSI rate was observed on the Abdominal Transplant Unit beginning in 2016. An initiative began in 2017 to evaluate whether CLABSI rate reduction was sustainable for at least 1 year and to identify key determinants of this sustainability. Interventions were aimed at infection prevention best practices, care standardization, and team-based monitoring. Interventions included (1) re-education on CLABSI reduction, (2) two RN dressing changes to validate practice during central line dressing change, (3) blood draws from central lines (during non-emergent situations) had to be approved by nurse manager, physician lead and transplant quality physician, (4) CLABSI prevention nurses were chosen as designated phlebotomists for patients with prior approval, (5) daily line review was performed to address line days, indication of line (remove latent lines) and plan of care (transition to permanent access) and this information was shared with the unit physician lead and transplant quality team. Assuring compliance with audits and timely feedback with clinician accountability were vital with compliance with best practices. Results Conclusion During the intervention, CLABSI infection rates dropped from 4.825 to 1.533 in 1,000 CVC days. The sustainability plan for this program is to continue line audits, assessing line necessity and review the effectiveness of the initiatives, review all new CLABSI data with staff and implement new changes as necessary. Joint, ongoing multidisciplinary collaboration is essential to reduce CLABSIs and optimize quality in a challenging, high-acuity patient population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Public Reporting of Health Care–Associated Infections (HAIs): Approach to Choosing HAI Measures

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 768-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Passaretti ◽  
P. Barclay ◽  
P. Pronovost ◽  
T. M. Perl ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Public Reporting ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control

Objective.To develop a method for selecting health care–associated infection (HAI) measures for public reporting.Context.HAIs are common, serious, and costly adverse outcomes of medical care that affect 2 million people in the United States annually. Thirty-seven states have introduced or passed legislation requiring public reporting of HAI measures. State legislation varies widely regarding which HAIs to report, how the data are collected and reported, and public availability of results.Design.The Maryland Health Care Commission developed an HAI Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) that consisted of a group of experts in the field of healthcare epidemiology, infection prevention and control (IPC), and public health. This group reviewed public reporting systems in other states, surveyed Maryland hospitals to determine the current state of IPC programs, performed a literature review on HAI measures, and developed six criteria for ranking the measures: impact, unprovability, inclusiveness, frequency, functionality, and feasibility. The committee and experts in the field then ranked each of 18 proposed HAI measures. A composite score was determined for each measure.Results.Among outcome measures, the rate of central line–associated bloodstream infections ranked highest, followed by the rate of post–coronary artery bypass grafting surgical-site infections. Among process measures, perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, compliance with central-line bundles, compliance with hand hygiene, and healthcare-worker influenza vaccination ranked highest.Conclusions.Our qualitative criteria facilitated consensus on the HAI TAC and provided a useful framework for public reporting of HAI measures. Validation will be important for such approaches to be supported by the scientific community.

scholarly journals Quality Improvement Measures to Reduce Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s362-s363
Author(s):  
Tamika Anderson ◽  
Michelle Flood ◽  
Susan Kelley ◽  
Lea Ann Pugh ◽  
Renato Casabar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Neonatal Infection ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Evidence Based

Background: Central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality for neonates; they also increased healthcare costs and duration of hospitalization. This population is susceptible to infections because of their undeveloped immune systems, and they require intravenous access until they can tolerate enteral feedings, which for extremely premature infants can take several weeks (if not months) to achieve. Our hospital is a regional-referral teaching hospital with 772 licensed beds. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a level 3, 35-bed unit where the most critically ill neonates receive care. After a sustained 3-year period of zero CLABSIs, we identified 10 infections between September 2016 through April 2018. Methods: A multidisciplinary team known as the neonatal infection prevention team (NIPT) was reinstated. This team included members from nursing and infection prevention (IP) and from NICU Shared Governance, as well as a neonatal nurse practitioner (NNP) and a neonatologist to review these CLABSIs. Evidence-based practices, policies, and procedures were implemented to help reduce CLABSIs. Nurse educators provided education and training. The infection prevention team reinstated and modified the central-line maintenance and insertion tools to document compliance and to identify any gaps in care. Nurses were expected to document line maintenance once per shift (a.m. and p.m.). All CLABSIs were entered into the CDC NHSN and the hospital’s safety event reporting system, which required follow-up by a clinical manager. The infection prevention team monitored NHSN standardized infection ratios (SIRs) monthly. The SIR is the number of observed events divided by the number predicted (calculated based on national aggregate data). Results: The highest reported quarterly SIR was 1.423, which occurred in the third quarter of 2018 (Fig. 1). Overall compliance with line maintenance protocols was 86% on the morning shift and 89% on the afternoon shift. With implementation of an evidence-based bundle, the NICU had a rolling 12-month SIR of 0.00 as of October 2019. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary team development, implementation of evidence-based bundle elements, and education on catheter care contributed to the long-term success in decreasing CLABSI rates in our NICU. Although this implementation achieved a zero CLABSI rate, we experienced some barriers, including compliance issues with staff not completing the audit tools, staff turnover, and high patient census.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Effect of Removing Contact Precautions for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms on Hospital Infections in a Pediatric Health System

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s199-s200
Author(s):  
Matthew Linam ◽  
Dorian Hoskins ◽  
Preeti Jaggi ◽  
Mark Gonzalez ◽  
Renee Watson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Discontinuation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) have failed to show an increase in associated transmission or infections in adult healthcare settings. Pediatric experience is limited. Objective: We evaluated the impact of discontinuing contact precautions for MRSA, VRE, and extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing gram-negative bacilli (ESBLs) on device-associated healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Methods: In October 2018, contact precautions were discontinued for children with MRSA, VRE, and ESBLs in a large, tertiary-care pediatric healthcare system comprising 2 hospitals and 620 beds. Coincident interventions that potentially reduced HAIs included blood culture diagnostic stewardship (June 2018), a hand hygiene education initiative (July 2018), a handshake antibiotic stewardship program (December 2018) and multidisciplinary infection prevention rounding in the intensive care units (November 2018). Compliance with hand hygiene and HAI prevention bundles were monitored. Device-associated HAIs were identified using standard definitions. Annotated run charts were used to track the impact of interventions on changes in device-associated HAIs over time. Results: Average hand hygiene compliance was 91%. Compliance with HAI prevention bundles was 81% for ventilator-associated pneumonias, 90% for catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and 97% for central-line–associated bloodstream infections. Overall, device-associated HAIs decreased from 6.04 per 10,000 patient days to 3.25 per 10,000 patient days after October 2018 (Fig. 1). Prior to October 2018, MRSA, VRE and ESBLs accounted for 10% of device-associated HAIs. This rate decreased to 5% after October 2018. The decrease in HAIs was likely related to interventions such as infection prevention rounds and handshake stewardship. Conclusions: Discontinuation of contact precautions for children with MRSA, VRE, and ESBLs were not associated with increased device-associated HAIs, and such discontinuation is likely safe in the setting of robust infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship programs.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Results of the CHlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing implementation intervention to improve evidence-based nursing practices for prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections Study (CHanGing BathS): a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Staci S. Reynolds ◽  
Patricia Woltz ◽  
Edward Keating ◽  
Janice Neff ◽  
Jennifer Elliott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Educational Outreach ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Intervention Effect ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Outreach Visits ◽  
Educational Outreach Visits

Abstract Background Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) result in approximately 28,000 deaths and approximately $2.3 billion in added costs to the U.S. healthcare system each year, and yet, many of these infections are preventable. At two large health systems in the southeast United States, CLABSIs continue to be an area of opportunity. Despite strong evidence for interventions to prevent CLABSI and reduce associated patient harm, such as use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing, the adoption of these interventions in practice is poor. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of a tailored, multifaceted implementation program on nursing staff’s compliance with the CHG bathing process and electronic health record (EHR) documentation in critically ill patients. The secondary objectives were to examine the (1) moderating effect of unit characteristics and cultural context, (2) intervention effect on nursing staff’s knowledge and perceptions of CHG bathing, and (3) intervention effect on CLABSI rates. Methods A stepped wedged cluster-randomized design was used with units clustered into 4 sequences; each sequence consecutively began the intervention over the course of 4 months. The Grol and Wensing Model of Implementation helped guide selection of the implementation strategies, which included educational outreach visits and audit and feedback. Compliance with the appropriate CHG bathing process and daily CHG bathing documentation were assessed. Outcomes were assessed 12 months after the intervention to assess for sustainability. Results Among the 14 clinical units participating, 8 were in a university hospital setting and 6 were in community hospital settings. CHG bathing process compliance and nursing staff’s knowledge and perceptions of CHG bathing significantly improved after the intervention (p = .009, p = .002, and p = .01, respectively). CHG bathing documentation compliance and CLABSI rates did not significantly improve; however, there was a clinically significant 27.4% decrease in CLABSI rates. Conclusions Using educational outreach visits and audit and feedback implementation strategies can improve adoption of evidence-based CHG bathing practices. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03898115, Registered 28 March 2019.

The Past, Present, and Future of Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention in Pediatrics: Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (S1) ◽  
pp. S27-S31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina A. Bryant ◽  
Danielle M. Zerr ◽  
W. Charles Huskins ◽  
Aaron M. Milstone
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Prevention Strategies ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Research Topics ◽  
The Past ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Current Practices

Central line–associated bloodstream infections cause morbidity and mortality in children. We explore the evidence for prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infections in children, assess current practices, and propose research topics to improve prevention strategies.

scholarly journals Implementation of a Quality Improvement Role for Unlicensed Assistive Personnel and Effects on Infection Prevention

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s73-s74
Author(s):  
Natalie Schnell ◽  
Lauren DiBiase ◽  
Amy Selimos ◽  
Lisa Stancill ◽  
Shelley Summerlin-Long ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Process Measure

Background: Care bundles comprise evidence-based practices and interventions that are easily and consistently implemented while improving patient outcomes. As patient acuity and task overload continue to increase, infection prevention bundle and process measure compliance and data collection may become a lower priority for registered nurses (RNs). In early 2019, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) began full-time quality liaison work on a 53-bed inpatient adult oncology unit at UNC Medical Center to provide targeted compliance data collection and to correct deficits in real time when possible and within the appropriate scope of practice. Methods: The quality liaison CNA is highly motivated, with a relevant clinical background and effective communication skills. After conducting a gap analysis, the unit developed specific responsibilities for several areas of quality improvement, including infection prevention. In addition to rounding on all patients daily, the quality liaison (1) performs direct patient care tasks like Foley catheter care, (2) conducts patient education on topics such as chlorhexidine gluconate treatments, (3) performs all relevant process measure audits, and (4) easily relays missed or needed care to RNs with a door sign created as part of this initiative. High-risk findings, such as a loose central-line dressing, prompt immediate communication to the RN, with follow-up and escalation when necessary. Results: Patients and staff received the quality liaison well, and the increased attention to care bundle components and auditing ensured consistent, evidence-based care along with accurate and reliable data collection. Compared to the previous calendar year, the number of central-line audits on the unit increased by >1,400 by the end of 2019. Patient outcomes improved, and during 1 fiscal year, the unit achieved rate reductions between 40% and 55% for central-line–associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and healthcare-associated C. difficile infections. Staffing and logistical challenges imposed by the COVID-19 global pandemic have hampered this work because the quality liaison was redeployed to direct patient care intermittently. Correspondingly, from July to October 2020, the same infection rates increased between 30% and 353%. Conclusions: Having a designated quality liaison is an effective means to achieving quality improvements while remaining an integral member of the patient care team. As staffing has improved on this unit, the quality liaison has refocused efforts, and infection rates are beginning to improve. Given the success of the quality liaison role in improving quality outcomes on this unit, the hospital is exploring expansion of this model to additional units.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document