Achieving Zero Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: Connector Design Combined with Practice in the Long-Term Acute Care Setting

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-77
Author(s):  
Debra Lynch
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous Line ◽  
Complex Patient ◽  
Sample Data ◽  
Needleless Connector ◽  
Rare Opportunity

Abstract Reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) to zero is especially challenging in long-term acute care (LTAC) hospitals because patients usually have the line in place at admission. The central venous line may have been in place from days to weeks before admission. The LTAC thus has no control over the site selection, catheter selection, insertion protocol, and care and maintenance the catheter received before admission. Using comprehensive practice-based evidence for clinical practice improvement, our LTAC used different needleless connectors during a 3-year period to achieve zero CLABSIs. The sample data offers a rare opportunity to compare different needleless connectors and in a wide sample of complex patient diagnoses. Needleless connector design in combination with nursing care and management can achieve zero CLABSI,s even in the challenging LTAC environment.

Device-Associated Infection Rates, Device Utilization, and Antimicrobial Resistance in Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals Reporting to the National Healthcare Safely Network, 2010

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 993-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit S. Chitnis ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards ◽  
Phillip M. Ricks ◽  
Dawn M. Sievert ◽  
Scott K. Fridkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Methicillin Resistance ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
National Healthcare ◽  
Tract Infections

Objective.To evaluate national data on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), device utilization, and antimicrobial resistance in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs).Design and Setting.Comparison of data from LTACHs and from medical and medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in short-stay acute care hospitals reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) during 2010.Methods.Rates of central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) as well as device utilization ratios were calculated. For each HAI, pathogen profiles and antimicrobial resistance prevalence were evaluated. Comparisons were made using Poisson regression and the Mood median and x2 tests.Results.In 2010, 104 LTACHs reported CLABSIs and 57 reported CAUTIs and VAP to the NHSN. Median CLABSI rates in LTACHs (1.25 events per 1,000 device-days reported; range, 0.0-5.96) were comparable to rates in major teaching ICUs and were higher than those in other ICUs. CAUTI rates in LTACHs (median, 2.61; range, 0.0-9.92) were higher and VAP rates (median, 0.0; range, 0.0-3.29) were generally lower than those in ICUs. Central line utilization in LTACHs was higher than that in ICUs, whereas urinary catheter and ventilator utilization was lower. Methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus CLABSIs (83%) and vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecalis CAUTIs (44%) were higher in LTACHs than in ICUs. Multidrug resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa CAUTIs (25%) was higher in LTACHs than in most ICUs.Conclusions.CLABSIs and CAUTIs associated with multidrug-resistant organisms present a challenge in LTACHs. Continued HAI surveillance with pathogen-level data can guide prevention efforts in LTACHs.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(10):993-1000

scholarly journals Pathogens Associated With Repeat Versus Single Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections, Acute-Care Hospitals, NHSN

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s343-s344
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Dudeck ◽  
Katherine Allen-Bridson ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
National Level ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Repeat Infection ◽  
Single Versus

Background: The NHSN is the nation’s largest surveillance system for healthcare-associated infections. Since 2011, acute-care hospitals (ACHs) have been required to report intensive care unit (ICU) central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) to the NHSN pursuant to CMS requirements. In 2015, this requirement included general medical, surgical, and medical-surgical wards. Also in 2015, the NHSN implemented a repeat infection timeframe (RIT) that required repeat CLABSIs, in the same patient and admission, to be excluded if onset was within 14 days. This analysis is the first at the national level to describe repeat CLABSIs. Methods: Index CLABSIs reported in ACH ICUs and select wards during 2015–2108 were included, in addition to repeat CLABSIs occurring at any location during the same period. CLABSIs were stratified into 2 groups: single and repeat CLABSIs. The repeat CLABSI group included the index CLABSI and subsequent CLABSI(s) reported for the same patient. Up to 5 CLABSIs were included for a single patient. Pathogen analyses were limited to the first pathogen reported for each CLABSI, which is considered to be the most important cause of the event. Likelihood ratio χ2 tests were used to determine differences in proportions. Results: Of the 70,214 CLABSIs reported, 5,983 (8.5%) were repeat CLABSIs. Of 3,264 nonindex CLABSIs, 425 (13%) were identified in non-ICU or non-select ward locations. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in both the single and repeat CLABSI groups (14.2% and 12%, respectively) (Fig. 1). Compared to all other pathogens, CLABSIs reported with Candida spp were less likely in a repeat CLABSI event than in a single CLABSI event (P < .0001). Insertion-related organisms were more likely to be associated with single CLABSIs than repeat CLABSIs (P < .0001) (Fig. 2). Alternatively, Enterococcus spp or Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. oxytoca were more likely to be associated with repeat CLABSIs than single CLABSIs (P < .0001). Conclusions: This analysis highlights differences in the aggregate pathogen distributions comparing single versus repeat CLABSIs. Assessing the pathogens associated with repeat CLABSIs may offer another way to assess the success of CLABSI prevention efforts (eg, clean insertion practices). Pathogens such as Enterococcus spp and Klebsiella spp demonstrate a greater association with repeat CLABSIs. Thus, instituting prevention efforts focused on these organisms may warrant greater attention and could impact the likelihood of repeat CLABSIs. Additional analysis of patient-specific pathogens identified in the repeat CLABSI group may yield further clarification.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals 584. Use of Multi-Disciplinary Prevention Rounds to Reduce Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S275-S276
Author(s):  
Matthew Linam ◽  
Jessica Wright ◽  
Kum Kim ◽  
Cara Van Treek ◽  
Patrick Spafford
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous Line ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clabsi Rate

Abstract Background Despite successful implementation of evidence-based prevention bundles, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) continue to occur in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We hypothesized that multi-disciplinary prevention rounds may be able to further reduce CLABSIs. Methods We implemented bedside rounds in a 39-bed tertiary NICU in November 2018 with the focus of reducing CLABSIs. Standardized rounds for all patients with a central venous line (CVL) occurred 2–3 times/week on weekdays during either the day or evening shifts. Rounds included NICU nursing leadership, the Hospital Epidemiologist and the patient’s nurse. Questions focused on the CVL maintenance bundle, reducing line access, and patient-specific CLABSI risk factors. Best practices were reinforced and solutions for identified risk factors were developed. Recommendations were communicated to the physician, as appropriate. Prevention rounds data were collected. Nurses and providers in the NICU were surveyed about their perceptions of the rounds. CLABSIs were identified by Infection Prevention using standard definitions. Results The average daily NICU census was 35.6, with an average of 14 patients with CVLs/day. The average duration of rounds was 45 minutes. Recommendations to physicians, such as changing medications from intravenous to oral or line removal, were accepted 85% of the time. 74.5% of nurses and 87.5% of providers thought that prevention rounds had at least some impact on CLABSI prevention. Nurse and provider responses to the perceived impact of CLABSI prevention rounds are in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. In the 12 months prior to starting prevention rounds, the CLABSI rate was 1.53 /1000 line days and the CLABSI rate for the 6 months after starting rounds was 0.99/1,000 line days, a 65% decrease. Conclusion CLABSI prevention rounds helped reinforce evidence-based prevention practices, identified patient-specific risk factors and improved physician-nurse communication. CLABSIs in NICU were reduced. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections in 2 Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda L. Wolfenden ◽  
Grant Anderson ◽  
Emir Veledar ◽  
Arjun Srinivasan
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals

scholarly journals Mucosal Barrier Injury Laboratory-Confirmed Bloodstream Infections (MBI-LCBI): Descriptive Analysis of Data Reported to National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), 2013

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Epstein ◽  
Isaac See ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards ◽  
Shelley S. Magill ◽  
Nicola D. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Mucosal Barrier ◽  
National Healthcare ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Mucosal Barrier Injury ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Clabsi Rate

OBJECTIVESTo determine the impact of mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections (MBI-LCBIs) on central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates during the first year of MBI-LCBI reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)DESIGNDescriptive analysis of 2013 NHSN dataSETTINGSelected inpatient locations in acute care hospitalsMETHODSA descriptive analysis of MBI-LCBI cases was performed. CLABSI rates per 1,000 central-line days were calculated with and without the inclusion of MBI-LCBIs in the subset of locations reporting ≥1 MBI-LCBI, and in all locations (regardless of MBI-LCBI reporting) to determine rate differences overall and by location type.RESULTSFrom 418 locations in 252 acute care hospitals reporting ≥1 MBI-LCBIs, 3,162 CLABSIs were reported; 1,415 (44.7%) met the MBI-LCBI definition. Among these locations, removing MBI-LCBI from the CLABSI rate determination produced the greatest CLABSI rate decreases in oncology (49%) and ward locations (45%). Among all locations reporting CLABSI data, including those reporting no MBI-LCBIs, removing MBI-LCBI reduced rates by 8%. Here, the greatest decrease was in oncology locations (38% decrease); decreases in other locations ranged from 1.2% to 4.2%.CONCLUSIONSAn understanding of the potential impact of removing MBI-LCBIs from CLABSI data is needed to accurately interpret CLABSI trends over time and to inform changes to state and federal reporting programs. Whereas the MBI-LCBI definition may have a large impact on CLABSI rates in locations where patients with certain clinical conditions are cared for, the impact of MBI-LCBIs on overall CLABSI rates across inpatient locations appears to be more modest.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;37(1):2–7

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document