scholarly journals Risk of Readmission After Discharge From Skilled Nursing Facilities Following Heart Failure Hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 432-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himali Weerahandi ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Haikun Bao ◽  
Jeph Herrin ◽  
Kumar Dharmarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Heart Failure Hospitalization ◽  
Skilled Nursing

Safe Transitions and Congregate Living in the Age of COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A Boyle ◽  
Urmila Ravichandran ◽  
Valerie Hankamp ◽  
Nadim Ilbawi ◽  
Coleen Conway-Svec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Relative Reduction ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Or Efficiency ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Value Based Care

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 represents a grave risk to residents in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether establishment of an appropriate-use committee was associated with a reduction in SNF utilization. DESIGNS, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study at NorthShore University HealthSystem, a multihospital integrated health system in northern Illinois. Participants were patients hospitalized from March 19, 2019, to July 16, 2020. INTERVENTION: Creation of a multidisciplinary committee to assess appropriateness of discharge to SNF following hospitalization. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was total discharges to SNFs. Secondary outcomes were new discharges to SNFs, readmissions, length of stay (LOS), and COVID-19 incidence following discharge. RESULTS: Matched populations pre and post intervention were each 4424 patients. Post intervention, there was a relative reduction in total SNF discharges of 49.7% (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.38-0.47) and in new SNF discharges of 66.9% (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25-0.34). Differences in readmissions and LOS were not statistically significant. For patients discharged to a SNF, 2.99% (95% CI, 1.59%-4.39%) developed COVID-19 within 30 days, compared with 0.26% (95% CI, 0.29%-0.93%) of patients discharged to other settings (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Implementing a review committee to assess for appropriateness of SNF use after a hospitalization during the COVID-19 pandemic is highly effective. There was no negative impact on safety or efficiency of hospital care, and reduced SNF use likely prevented several cases of COVID-19. This model could serve as a template for other hospitals to reduce the risks of COVID-19 in SNFs and as part of a value-based care strategy.

scholarly journals 2492 Risk of readmission after discharge from skilled nursing facilities following heart failure hospitalization

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (S1) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
Himali Weerahandi ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Jeph Herrin ◽  
Kumar Dharmarajan ◽  
Lucy Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hazard Rate ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Unplanned Readmission ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Heart Failure Hospitalization ◽  
Skilled Nursing

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Determine timing of risk of readmissions within 30 days among patients first discharged to a skilled nursing facilities (SNF) after heart failure hospitalization and subsequently discharged home. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with SNF stays of 30 days or less following discharge from a heart failure hospitalization. Patients were followed for 30 days following discharge from SNF. We categorized patients based on SNF length of stay (LOS): 1–6 days, 7–13 days, 14–30 days. We then fit a piecewise exponential Bayesian model with the outcome as time to readmission after discharge from SNF for each group. Our event of interest was unplanned readmission; death and planned readmissions were considered as competing risks. Our model examined 2 different time intervals following discharge from SNF: 0–3 days post SNF discharge and 4–30 days post SNF discharge. We reported the hazard rate (credible interval) of readmission for each time interval. We examined all Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients 65 and older admitted from July 2012 to June 2015 with a principal discharge diagnosis of HF, based on methods adopted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for hospital quality measurement. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our study included 67,585 HF hospitalizations discharged to SNF and subsequently discharged home [median age, 84 years (IQR; 78–89); female, 61.0%]; 13,257 (19.2%) were discharged with home care, 54,328 (80.4%) without. Median length of SNF admission was 17 days (IQR; 11–22). In total, 16,333 (24.2%) SNF discharges to home were readmitted within 30 days of SNF discharge; median time to readmission was 9 days (IQR; 3–18). The hazard rate of readmission for each group was significantly increased on days 0–3 after discharge from SNF compared with days 4–30 after discharge from SNF. In addition, the hazard rate of readmission during the first 0–3 days after discharge from SNF decreased as the LOS in SNF increased. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The hazard rate of readmission after SNF discharge following heart failure hospitalization is highest during the first 6 days home. Length of stay at SNF also has an effect on risk of readmission immediately after discharge from SNF; patients with a longer length of stay in SNF were less likely to be readmitted in the first 3 days after discharge from SNF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document