scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness of a Proactive Primary Care Program for Frail Older People: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 1029-1036.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke Bleijenberg ◽  
Irene Drubbel ◽  
Rabin EJ. Neslo ◽  
Marieke J. Schuurmans ◽  
Valerie H. ten Dam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Older People ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Frail Older People ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Primary Care Program ◽  
Cluster Randomized

scholarly journals Stratified care integrated with eHealth versus usual primary care physiotherapy in patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L. van Tilburg ◽  
Corelien J. J. Kloek ◽  
Martijn F. Pisters ◽  
J. Bart Staal ◽  
Johanna M. van Dongen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Stratified Care ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Blended Care

Abstract Background Neck and shoulder complaints are common in primary care physiotherapy. These patients experience pain and disability, resulting in high societal costs due to, for example, healthcare use and work absence. Content and intensity of physiotherapy care can be matched to a patient’s risk of persistent disabling pain. Mode of care delivery can be matched to the patient’s suitability for blended care (integrating eHealth with physiotherapy sessions). It is hypothesized that combining these two approaches to stratified care (referred to from this point as Stratified Blended Approach) will improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy for patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints compared to usual physiotherapy. Methods This paper presents the protocol of a multicenter, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group, cluster randomized controlled trial. A total of 92 physiotherapists will be recruited from Dutch primary care physiotherapy practices. Physiotherapy practices will be randomized to the Stratified Blended Approach arm or usual physiotherapy arm by a computer-generated random sequence table using SPSS (1:1 allocation). Number of physiotherapists (1 or > 1) will be used as a stratification variable. A total of 238 adults consulting with neck and/or shoulder complaints will be recruited to the trial by the physiotherapy practices. In the Stratified Blended Approach arm, physiotherapists will match I) the content and intensity of physiotherapy care to the patient’s risk of persistent disabling pain, categorized as low, medium or high (using the Keele STarT MSK Tool) and II) the mode of care delivery to the patient’s suitability and willingness to receive blended care. The control arm will receive physiotherapy as usual. Neither physiotherapists nor patients in the control arm will be informed about the Stratified Blended Approach arm. The primary outcome is region-specific pain and disability (combined score of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index & Neck Pain and Disability Scale) over 9 months. Effectiveness will be compared using linear mixed models. An economic evaluation will be performed from the societal and healthcare perspective. Discussion The trial will be the first to provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Stratified Blended Approach compared with usual physiotherapy in patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register: NL8249. Officially registered since 27 December 2019. Date of first enrollment: 30 September 2020. Study status: ongoing, data collection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document