The UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 Brief Form: A Screening Tool for Trauma-Exposed Youths

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 434-443
Author(s):  
Benjamin Rolon-Arroyo ◽  
Benjamin Oosterhoff ◽  
Christopher M. Layne ◽  
Alan M. Steinberg ◽  
Robert S. Pynoos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tool ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Reaction Index

Psychometric Properties of a DSM-5-Based Screening Tool for Women's Perceptions of Premenstrual Symptoms

2021 ◽  
pp. 003329412097969
Author(s):  
Meghan A. Richards ◽  
Kirsten A. Oinonen
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Premenstrual Symptom ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Premenstrual Symptoms ◽  
Screening Measure ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Symptom Screening ◽  
Women’S Perceptions

A premenstrual screening tool is needed when time constraints and attrition limit the feasibility of daily ratings. The present study examines the utility of a novel, 33-item, retrospective, dimensional, DSM-5-based, screening measure developed to explore women’s perceptions of premenstrual symptomatology. This is the first measure that examines perception of impairment for each DSM-5 symptom and assesses the frequency criterion. Participants (N = 331) reported symptoms ranging from none to a level consistent with a provisional DSM-5 diagnosis of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD). Initial psychometric properties indicated a five-factor structure: (1) affective symptoms; (2) fatigue, sleep, and anhedonia; (3) symptom frequency; (4) impairment and severity of appetite change and physical symptoms; and (5) difficulty concentrating. The total symptom scale and the frequency, severity, and impairment subscales demonstrated high internal consistency. Strong correlations between this dimensional measure and other retrospective and prospective premenstrual symptom measures suggest strong convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity. Premenstrual symptom groups created using this screening measure (minimal, mild/moderate, severe) differed on other retrospective and prospective measures of premenstrual symptoms. There was evidence of divergent validity and lack of an acquiescence bias. We also report data describing women’s perceptions of the frequency, level of impairment, and level of severity for each DSM-5 PMDD symptom over a 12-month period and discuss implications for future research on premenstrual phenomenology. Initial evidence for the reliability and construct validity of this symptom screening measure suggests potential value for assessing premenstrual symptomatology in research and practice.

scholarly journals Validation of a French version of the Sleep Condition Indicator: a clinical screening tool for insomnia disorder according to DSM-5 criteria

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 702-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Bayard ◽  
Cindy Lebrun ◽  
Khaalid Hassan Maudarbocus ◽  
Vanessa Schellaert ◽  
Alicia Joffre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tool ◽  
Clinical Screening ◽  
French Version ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Insomnia Disorder ◽  
Sleep Condition ◽  
Condition Indicator

Psychometric Properties of the Parent-Report Version of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cláudia Ramos ◽  
Eva Cabral ◽  
Vítor Serrão ◽  
Pedro Figueira ◽  
Pedro Vaz Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Reaction Index

scholarly journals Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Personality Inventory for DSM-5-BF in a Primary Care Sample

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 846-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Porcerelli ◽  
Christopher J. Hopwood ◽  
John R. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Growing Body ◽  
Psychiatric Screening

A growing body of research supports the validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in evaluating community and psychiatric samples. Although maladaptive personality also has significant relevance in primary care settings, research on the PID-5 in primary care samples is limited. In this study, the authors examined the intercorrelations, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the brief form of the PID-5 (PID-5-BF) in 100 primary care outpatients. Results are consistent with findings in other samples in suggesting that PID-5 domains are moderately intercorrelated and associated with a variety of mental health variables. Smaller associations with physical health variables support the discriminant validity of the instrument. Overall, results suggest that the PID-5-BF can provide a useful psychiatric screening tool in primary care settings.

Italian validation of the Sleep Condition Indicator: A clinical screening tool to evaluate Insomnia Disorder according to DSM-5 criteria

2015 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Palagini ◽  
Gloria Ragno ◽  
Lisa Caccavale ◽  
Alessia Gronchi ◽  
Michele Terzaghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tool ◽  
Clinical Screening ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Italian Validation ◽  
Insomnia Disorder ◽  
Sleep Condition ◽  
Condition Indicator

scholarly journals The Psychometric Properties of the Bangla Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): A Large-scale Validation Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Saiful Islam ◽  
Most. Zannatul Ferdous ◽  
Md. Safaet Hossain Sujan ◽  
Rafia Tasnim ◽  
Jakir Hossain Bhuiyan Masud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress ◽  
Hybrid Model ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Stress Disorder ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

Abstract Background: The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) is the most widely used screening tool in assessing posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders (DSM-5) criteria. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly translated Bangla PCL-5. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among 10,605 individuals (61.0% male; mean age: 23.6±5.5 [13-71 years]) during May and June 2020, several months after the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh. The survey included Bangla PCL-5 and PHQ-9 depression scale. We used confirmatory factor analysis to test the four-factor DSM-5 model, the six-factor Anhedonia model, and the seven-factor Hybrid model. Results: Bangla PCL-5 displayed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90). The Bangla PCL-5 score was significantly correlated with scores of the PHQ-9 depression scale. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated the models had a good fit to the data, including the four-factor DSM-5 model, the six-factor Anhedonia model, and the seven-factor Hybrid model.Conclusions: The Bangla PCL-5 appears to be a valid and reliable psychometric screening tool that may be employed in the prospective evaluation of posttraumatic stress disorder in Bangladesh.

scholarly journals UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5): a psychometric study of adolescents sampled from communities in eleven countries

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1605282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Doric ◽  
Dejan Stevanovic ◽  
Dusko Stupar ◽  
Panos Vostanis ◽  
Olayinka Atilola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Study ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Reaction Index

The DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure as a Screening Tool

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Bastiaens ◽  
James Galus
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tool ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Level 1

scholarly journals The delirium screening tool 4AT in routine clinical practice: prediction of mortality, sensitivity and specificity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigurd Evensen ◽  
Anette Hylen Ranhoff ◽  
Stian Lydersen ◽  
Ingvild Saltvedt
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Index Test ◽  
Clinical Routine ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Prediction Of Mortality ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Purpose Delirium is common and associated with poor outcomes, partly due to underdetection. We investigated if the delirium screening tool 4 A’s test (4AT) score predicts 1 year mortality and explored the sensitivity and specificity of the 4AT when applied as part of a clinical routine. Methods Secondary analyses of a prospective study of 228 patients acutely admitted to a Medical Geriatric Ward. Physicians without formal training conducted the index test (the 4AT); a predefined cut-off ≥ 4 suggested delirium. Reference standard was delirium diagnosed by two geriatricians using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM-5). We calculated hazard ratios (HR) using Cox regression based on the groups 4AT = 0, 1–3, 4–7 and ≥ 8, first unadjusted, then adjusted for the covariates age, comorbidity, and personal activities of daily living. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Results Mean age of patients was 86.6 years, 139 (61.0%) were female, 78 (34.2%) had DSM-5 delirium; of these, 56 had 4AT-delirium. 1 year mortality was 27.6% (63 patients). Compared to 4AT score 0, the group 4AT ≥ 8 had increased 1 year mortality (HR 2.86, 95% confidence interval 1.28–6.37, p = 0.010). The effect was reduced in multiadjusted analyses (HR 1.69, 95% confidence interval 0.70–4.07, p = 0.24). Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.72, 0.84, and 0.88, respectively. Conclusions 4AT ≥ 8 indicates increased mortality, but the effect was reduced in multiadjusted analyses. 4AT had acceptable sensitivity and specificity when applied as a clinical routine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document