Semantic categorization of digital home photo using photographic region templates

2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 503-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seungji Yang ◽  
Sang Kyun Kim ◽  
Kyong Sok Seo ◽  
Yong Man Ro ◽  
Ji-Yeon Kim ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-131
Author(s):  
Gérald Delelis ◽  
Véronique Christophe

Abstract. After experiencing an emotional event, people either seek out others’ presence (social affiliation) or avoid others’ presence (social isolation). The determinants and effects of social affiliation are now well-known, but social psychologists have not yet thoroughly studied social isolation. This study aims to ascertain which motives and corresponding regulation strategies participants report for social isolation following negative emotional events. A group of 96 participants retrieved from memory an actual negative event that led them to temporarily socially isolate themselves and freely listed up to 10 motives for social isolation. Through semantic categorization of the 423 motives reported by the participants, we found that “cognitive clarification” and “keeping one’s distance” – that is, the need for cognitive regulation and the refusal of socioaffective regulation, respectively – were the most commonly and quickly reported motives for social isolation. We discuss the findings in terms of ideas for future studies aimed at clarifying the role of social isolation in health situations.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penny M. Pexman ◽  
Jodi D. Edwards ◽  
Ian S. Hargreaves ◽  
Luke C. Henry ◽  
Bradley Goodyear

2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 955-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Brunel ◽  
Mathieu Lesourd ◽  
Elodie Labeye ◽  
Rémy Versace

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex L. White ◽  
Geoffrey M. Boynton ◽  
John Palmer

Reading is a demanding task, constrained by inherent processing capacity limits. Do those capacity limits allow for multiple words to be recognized in parallel? In a recent study, we measured semantic categorization accuracy for nouns presented in pairs. The words were replaced by post-masks after an interval that was set to each subject’s threshold, such that with focused attention they could categorize one word with ~80% accuracy. When subjects tried to divide attention between both words, their accuracy was so impaired that it supported a serial processing model: on each trial, subjects could categorize one word but had to guess about the other (White, Palmer & Boynton, 2018). In the experiments reported here, we investigated how our previous result generalizes across two tasks that require lexical access but vary in the depth of semantic processing (semantic categorization and lexical decision), and across different masking stimuli, word lengths, lexical frequencies and visual field positions. In all cases, the serial processing model was supported by two effects: (1) a sufficiently large accuracy deficit with divided compared to focused attention; and (2) a trial-by-trial stimulus processing tradeoff, meaning that the response to one word was more likely to be correct if the response to the other was incorrect. However, when the task was to detect colored letters, neither of those effects occurred, even though the post-masks limited accuracy in the same way. Altogether, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that visual processing of words is parallel but lexical access is serial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document