scholarly journals Programmable materials based on periodic cellular solids. Part I: Experiments

2016 ◽  
Vol 100-101 ◽  
pp. 485-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Restrepo ◽  
Nilesh D. Mankame ◽  
Pablo D. Zavattieri
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Solids ◽  
Programmable Materials

Cellular Solids

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorna J. Gibson ◽  
Michael F. Ashby
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Solids

scholarly journals Optimal design of unit‐cell based programmable materials

PAMM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Lichti ◽  
Heiko Andrä ◽  
Alexander Leichner ◽  
Ralf Müller ◽  
Franziska Wenz
Keyword(s):  
Optimal Design ◽  
Unit Cell ◽  
Programmable Materials

A Multiscale Approach to Modeling the Passive Mechanical Contribution of Cells in Tissues

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor K. Lai ◽  
Mohammad F. Hadi ◽  
Robert T. Tranquillo ◽  
Victor H. Barocas
Keyword(s):  
Extracellular Matrix ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Multiscale Model ◽  
Tissue Mechanics ◽  
Multiscale Approach ◽  
Cellular Solids ◽  
Comprehensive Model ◽  
Modeling Framework ◽  
Tissue Biomechanics ◽  
Tensegrity Model

In addition to their obvious biological roles in tissue function, cells often play a significant mechanical role through a combination of passive and active behaviors. Phenomenological and continuum modeling approaches to understand tissue biomechanics have included improved constitutive laws that incorporate anisotropy in the extracellular matrix (ECM) and/or cellular phenomenon, e.g, [1]. The lack of microstructural detail in these models, however, limits their ability to explore the respective contributions and interactions between different components within a tissue. In contrast, structural approaches attempt to understand tissue biomechanics by incorporating microstructural details directly into the model, e.g., the tensegrity model [2], cellular solids models [3], or biopolymer models [4]. Research in our group focuses on developing a comprehensive model to predict the mechanical behavior of soft tissues via a multiscale approach, a technique that allows integration of the microstructural details of different components into the modeling framework. A significant gap in our previous models, however, is the absence of cells. The current work represents an improvement of the multiscale model via the addition of cells, and investigates the passive mechanical contribution of cells to overall tissue mechanics.

Environmental–biomechanical reciprocity and the evolution of plant material properties

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl J Niklas ◽  
Frank W Telewski
Keyword(s):  
Physical Environment ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Abiotic Factors ◽  
Biotic Interactions ◽  
Cellular Solids ◽  
Form And Function ◽  
Evolutionary Innovation ◽  
Plant Form ◽  
And Function ◽  
Abiotic Environmental Factors

Abstract Abiotic–biotic interactions have shaped organic evolution since life first began. Abiotic factors influence growth, survival, and reproductive success, whereas biotic responses to abiotic factors have changed the physical environment (and indeed created new environments). This reciprocity is well illustrated by land plants who begin and end their existence in the same location while growing in size over the course of years or even millennia, during which environment factors change over many orders of magnitude. A biomechanical, ecological, and evolutionary perspective reveals that plants are (i) composed of materials (cells and tissues) that function as cellular solids (i.e. materials composed of one or more solid and fluid phases); (ii) that have evolved greater rigidity (as a consequence of chemical and structural changes in their solid phases); (iii) allowing for increases in body size and (iv) permitting acclimation to more physiologically and ecologically diverse and challenging habitats; which (v) have profoundly altered biotic as well as abiotic environmental factors (e.g. the creation of soils, carbon sequestration, and water cycles). A critical component of this evolutionary innovation is the extent to which mechanical perturbations have shaped plant form and function and how form and function have shaped ecological dynamics over the course of evolution.

Design of bending dominated lattice architectures with improved stiffness using hierarchy

2018 ◽  
Vol 233 (11) ◽  
pp. 3976-3993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maen Alkhader ◽  
Mohammad Nazzal ◽  
Karim Louca
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Cell Walls ◽  
Detrimental Effect ◽  
Diamond Lattice ◽  
Finite Element Simulations ◽  
Deformation Mechanisms ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Cellular Solids ◽  
Stiffness Anisotropy

Micro-architectured lattices are a promising subclass of cellular solids whose inner topologies can be tailored to enhance their stiffness. Generally, enhancing lattices' stiffness is achieved by increasing their connectivity. This strategy gives rise to a stiffer response by forcing lattices' ligaments to deform mainly in an axial manner. Conversely, this work is interested in developing micro-architectured lattices with enhanced stiffness, but whose cell walls deform in a flexural manner. Such structures can be more ductile and exhibit better energy mitigation abilities than their stretching dominated counterparts. Enhancing the stiffness of bending dominated lattices without increasing their connectivity can be realized by transforming them to hierarchical ones. This work explores, using experimentally verified finite element simulations, the effect of fractal-inspired hierarchy and customized nonfractal-based hierarchy on stiffness, anisotropy, and deformation mechanisms of an anisotropic bending dominated diamond lattice. Results show that fractal-inspired hierarchy can significantly enhance the stiffness of bending dominated lattices without affecting their deformation mechanisms or anisotropy level; ill-designed hierarchy can have a detrimental effect on lattice's stiffness; and customized hierarchy are more effective than fractal-inspired hierarchy in enhancing lattices' stiffness as well as can be more compatible with traditional, reliable, mass-producing manufacturing processes.

Implications of modeling approaches on the fatigue behavior of cellular solids

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Savio ◽  
Stefano Rosso ◽  
Andrea Curtarello ◽  
Roberto Meneghello ◽  
Gianmaria Concheri
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Behavior ◽  
Cellular Solids ◽  
Modeling Approaches
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document