scholarly journals Head and Neck Tumor Control Probability: Radiation Dose–Volume Effects in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Previously-Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer: Report of the AAPM Working Group

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Vargo ◽  
Vitali Moiseenko ◽  
Jimm Grimm ◽  
Jimmy Caudell ◽  
David A. Clump ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control Probability ◽  
Head And Neck Tumor ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Locally Recurrent

scholarly journals Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1910
Author(s):  
Kaley Woods ◽  
Robert K. Chin ◽  
Kiri A. Cook ◽  
Ke Sheng ◽  
Amar U. Kishan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Normal Tissue Complication Probability ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control Probability ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Recurrent Head

This study evaluates the potential for tumor dose escalation in recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients with automated non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning (HyperArc). Twenty rHNC patients are planned with conventional VMAT SBRT to 40 Gy while minimizing organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. They are then re-planned with the HyperArc technique to match these minimal OAR doses while escalating the target dose as high as possible. Then, we compare the dosimetry, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the two plan types. Our results show that the HyperArc technique significantly increases the mean planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) doses by 10.8 ± 4.4 Gy (25%) and 11.5 ± 5.1 Gy (26%) on average, respectively. There are no clinically significant differences in OAR doses, with maximum dose differences of <2 Gy on average. The average TCP is 23% (± 21%) higher for HyperArc than conventional plans, with no significant differences in NTCP for the brainstem, cord, mandible, or larynx. HyperArc can achieve significant tumor dose escalation while maintaining minimal OAR doses in the head and neck—potentially enabling improved local control for rHNC SBRT patients without increased risk of treatment-related toxicities.

scholarly journals Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enis Tinjak ◽  
Velda Smajlbegović ◽  
Adnan Beganović ◽  
Mirjana Ristanić ◽  
Halil Ćorović ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Adaptive Radiotherapy ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Parotid Glands ◽  
Image Guided Radiotherapy ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Radiation therapy has long played an integral role in the manage¬ment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC), both for organ preservation and to improve tumor control in the postoperative setting. The aim of this research is to investigate the effects of adaptive radiotherapy on dosimetric, clinical, and toxicity outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy treatment. Many sources have reported volume reductions in the primary target, nodal volumes, and parotid glands over treatment, which may result in unintended dosimetric changes affecting the side effect profile and even efficacy of the treatment. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is an interesting treatment paradigm that has been developed to directly adjust to these changes.Material and methods: This research contains the results of 15 studies, including clinical trials, randomized prospective and retrospective studies. The researches analyze the impact of radiation therapy on changes in tumor volume and the relationship with planned radiation dose delivery, as well as the possibility of using adaptive radiotherapy in response to identified changes. Also, medical articles and abstracts that are closely related to the title of adaptive radiotherapy were researched.Results: The application of ART significantly improved the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer, as well as two-year locoregional control of the disease. The average time to apply ART is the middle of the treatment course approximately 17 to 20 fractions of the treatment.Conclusion: Based on systematic review of the literature, evidence based changes in target volumes and dose reduction at OAR, adaptive radiotherapy is recommended treatment for most of the patients with head and neck cancer with the support of image-guided radiotherapy.

scholarly journals Radiobiological Evaluation of Dosimetric Plans for Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer According to Fractionation Regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 263-269
Author(s):  
E. S. Sukhikh ◽  
I. N. Sheyno ◽  
L. G. Sukhikh ◽  
A. V. Taletskiy ◽  
A. V. Vertinskiy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Rectal Wall ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Anterior Rectal Wall ◽  
Tumor Control Probability ◽  
Equivalent Uniform Dose ◽  
Dose Volume Histograms ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Fractionation Regimen

Objective. To determine the most effective irradiation regimen (total dose and dose per fraction) for hypofractionated treatment for prostate carcinomas according the TCP/NTCP radiobiological criteria.Material and methods. Using the tomographic information of five patients with low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma as an example, the authors devised dosimetric radiation therapy plans using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) procedure. They considered the range of total doses of 33.5 to 38 Gy administered in 4 and 5 fractions. Based on the equivalent uniform dose concept proposed by A. Niemierko and on the computed differential dose volume histograms, the investigators modeled local tumor control probability (TCP) values, by taking into account the uncertainties of main radiobiological parameters, and estimated normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for the anterior rectal wall as the organ most at risk of irradiation. An effective dosimetric plan was selected according to the UTCP criterion and the probability of complication-free tumor control, i.e. TCP (1 – NTCP).Results. The results of modeling the UTCP criterion show that with a higher total dose, the TCP value increases and so does the NTCP value, therefore the optimal radiation therapy plans are to irradiate with a total dose of 34 Gy over 4 fractions or with a dose of 36–37 Gy over 5 fractions. The difference between the fractionation regimens is that the UTCP value is achieved with a higher TCP value over 4 fractions and with a lower load on the rectal wall over 5 fractions.Conclusion. The choice of a specific fractionation regimen should be determined from the calculated values of differential dose volume histograms for each patient, as well as from radiobiological criteria, such as TCP, NTCP and UTCP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document