Boiling heat transfer and pressure drop of R-134a and R-1234yf in minichannels for low mass fluxes

2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 962-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mortada ◽  
A. Zoughaib ◽  
C. Arzano-Daurelle ◽  
D. Clodic
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Low Mass ◽  
R 134A

Thermal-Hydraulic Performance of R-134a Boiling at Low Mass Fluxes in a Small Vertical Brazed Plate Heat Exchanger

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Jin Kim ◽  
Leon Liebenberg ◽  
Anthony M. Jacobi
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Plate Heat Exchanger ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Low Mass ◽  
Brazed Plate Heat Exchanger ◽  
R 134A

An experimental investigation was performed to study the heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of refrigerant R-134a boiling in a chevron-patterned brazed plate heat exchanger (BPHE) at low mass flux. The heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop characteristics are analyzed in relation to varying mass flux (30–50 kgm−2s−1), saturation pressure (675 kPa and 833 kPa), heat flux (0.8 and 2.5 kWm−2), and vapor quality (0.1–0.9). The two-phase pressure drop shows a strong dependence on mass flux and significant saturation temperature drop at high mass flux. The two-phase heat transfer coefficient was both strongly dependent on heat flux (at vapor qualities below 0.4) and on mass flux (at vapor qualities above 0.4). There was also apparent dryout, as depicted by decreased heat transfer at high vapor qualities. These observations suggest that both nucleate and convective boiling mechanisms prevailed. Existing transition correlations however suggest that the experimental data is rather convection-dominant and not a mix of convection and nucleate boiling. The experimental data further strongly suggest the prevalence of both macrochannel and minichannel type flows. Several acknowledged semi-empirical transition criteria were employed to verify our observations. These criteria mostly support our observations that R-134a evaporating at low mass fluxes in a BPHE with a hydraulic diameter of 3.4 mm, has heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics typically indicative of macrochannel as well as minichannel flows. Disagreement however exists with accepted correlations regarding the prevalence of convective or nucleate boiling.

Effect of Inlet Restriction on Flow Boiling Heat Transfer in a Horizontal Microtube

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
YanFeng Fan ◽  
Ibrahim Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Low Mass

Flow boiling heat transfer in a horizontal microtube with inlet restriction (orifice) under uniform heating condition is experimentally investigated using FC-72 as working fluid. A stainless steel microtube with an inner diameter of 889 μm is selected as main microtube. Two microtubes with smaller diameters are assembled at the inlet of main microtube to achieve the restriction ratios of 50% and 20%. The experimental measurement is carried out at mass fluxes ranging from 160 to 870 kg/m2·s, heat fluxes varying from 6 to 170 kW/m2, inlet temperatures of 23 and 35 °C, and saturation pressures of 10 and 45 kPa. The effects of the orifices on two-phase pressure drop, critical heat flux (CHF), and flow boiling heat transfer coefficient are studied. The results show that the pressure drop caused by the orifice takes a considerable portion in the total pressure drop at low mass fluxes. This ratio decreases as the vapor quality or mass flux increases. The difference of normal critical heat flux in the microtubes with different orifice sizes is negligible. In the aspect of flow boiling heat transfer, the orifice is able to enhance the heat transfer at low mass flux and high saturation pressure, which indicates the contribution of orifice in the nucleate boiling dominated regime. However, the effect of orifice on flow boiling heat transfer is negligible in the forced convective boiling dominated regime.

Condensation Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop of R-404A in 7.0 mm O.D. Smooth and Microfin Tube at Low Mass Fluxes

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (01) ◽  
pp. 1850005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nae-Hyun Kim ◽  
Hyung-Ho Gook ◽  
Byung-Moo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Heat Transfer Enhancement ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Enhancement Factor ◽  
Condensation Heat Transfer ◽  
Transfer Enhancement ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Penalty Factor ◽  
Low Mass

R-404A condensation heat transfer and pressure drop data are provided for 7.0[Formula: see text]mm O.D. smooth and microfin tubes. Tests were conducted for a range of mass fluxes (from 80 to 200[Formula: see text]kg/m2s) and quality (from 0.2 to 0.8). The heat flux was 6[Formula: see text]kW/m2 and saturation temperature was 45[Formula: see text]C. It was found that both the heat transfer enhancement factor and the pressure drop penalty factor increase as mass flux increases. The range of pressure drop penalty factor (0.99–1.27) was smaller than that of heat transfer enhancement factor (1.21–1.96). Smooth tube heat transfer coefficients and pressure drops are reasonably predicted by Shah [An improved and extended general correlation for heat transfer during condensation in plain tubes, Int. J. HVAC&R Res. 15 (2009) 889–913] and Jung and Radermacher [Prediction of pressure drop during horizontal annular flow boiling of pure and mixed refrigerants, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 32 (1989) 2435–2446] correlation, respectively. For the microfin tube, however, all the existing correlations do not adequately predict the present data. Poor predictions may be attributed to the lack of R-404A and low mass flux data in their database.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document