Dual-degree oral and maxillofacial surgery: evidence-based view of Chilean candidates

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1153
Author(s):  
R.A. Cartes-Velasquez ◽  
M. Fernandez ◽  
N. Jara ◽  
H. Ramirez
Keyword(s):  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Dual Degree

scholarly journals Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Weiss ◽  
Andrew Read-Fuller
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
3 Dimensional

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a valuable imaging technique in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) that can help direct a surgeon’s approach to a variety of conditions. A 3-dimensional analysis of head and neck anatomy allows practitioners to plan appropriately, operate with confidence, and assess results post-operatively. CBCT imaging has clear indications and limitations. CBCT offers the clinician 3-dimensional and multi-planar views for a more accurate diagnosis and treatment without the financial burden and radiation exposure of conventional computed tomography (CT) scans. Furthermore, CBCT overcomes certain limitations of 2-dimensional imaging, such as distortion, magnification, and superimposition. However, CBCT lacks the detailed depiction of soft tissue conditions for evaluation of pathologic conditions, head and neck infections, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc evaluation. This review evaluates the evidence-based research supporting the application of CBCT in the various fields of oral and maxillofacial surgery, including dentoalveolar surgery, dental implants, TMJ, orthognathic surgery, trauma, and pathology, and will assess the value of CBCT in pre-operative assessment, surgical planning, and post-operative analysis when applicable. Additionally, the significant limitations of CBCT and potential areas for future research will be discussed.

Facial Cosmetic Surgery Training in American Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Diepenbrock ◽  
Rian W. Suihkonen
Keyword(s):  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Degree Programs ◽  
Reconstructive Procedures ◽  
Medical Specialties ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Training Requirements ◽  
Dual Degree

Facial cosmetic surgery is rapidly being incorporated into the contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) practice. The Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA), the accreditation body for American Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery residencies, mandates a minimum requirement in 4 major categories. Facial cosmetic surgery procedures are included in the “Facial Cosmetic and Reconstruction” category. This requirement stipulates that each graduating resident must complete at least 20 facial cosmetic and/or facial reconstructive procedures. We hypothesized that some OMS programs meet and exceed the minimum graduation requirement set forth by the CODA in the facial cosmetic and reconstruction category solely with cosmetic procedures. We also speculated that some OMS programs surpassed the minimal graduation requirements of medical specialties most commonly associated with performing facial cosmetic procedures. Finally, the research was intended to investigate whether there was a difference, in terms of cosmetic surgery experience, between 4-year OMS certificate programs and OMS programs with an incorporated medical degree (dual degree or 6-year program). Surveys were sent to all 102 CODA-accredited OMS programs. These data were analyzed to evaluate the total number of facial cosmetic procedures completed at each institution over a 5-year period and the average number of facial cosmetic surgery procedures per chief resident. In addition, a comparison was made between single and dual degree programs. Finally, these numbers were compared with medical residencies/fellowship accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Twenty-two of 102 programs returned the survey. Over the 5-year period (2011-2016), accredited OMS programs completed an average of 211 facial cosmetic procedures ranging from zero procedures to 1073. Genioplasties and rhinoplasties were the most common facial cosmetic surgery procedures tallied. Four-year OMS programs completed 20.3 procedures per chief resident while dual degree programs completed 9.7 cases on average. OMS programs with the largest volume of cases reached and exceeded many of the minimum procedure requirements set forth by plastic and reconstructive surgery residency programs and American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery Fellowships. With the vast differences among training requirements, it is challenging to assess what is a reasonable number of procedures to ensure a surgeon is comfortable and, more importantly, competent and proficient. When compared with the variability of requirements from medical specialties that commonly perform facial cosmetic procedures, the data support that comprehensive experience in facial cosmetic surgery is attainable within American Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residencies.

scholarly journals De Novo Practice of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 871-881
Author(s):  
Srinivas Gosla Reddy ◽  
Avni Pandey Acharya
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Additional Training ◽  
New Residents ◽  
Dual Degree

AbstractOral and maxillofacial surgery is a bridge between medicine and dentistry and the debate of pursuing a dual degree is a hot to trot topic worldwide, new residents should always weigh their abilities and focus on additional training in respective fields to improve their expertise. The experience of starting a practice in the scenario where more than 100-150 amateur oral surgeons are competing seems to be scary. The chapter deals with the problems faced by new surgeons in establishing their practice along with the solution to thrive in this competitive world. The chapter also emphasizes on the process of planning and setting up of a maxillofacial hospital along with the art of management of finances to guide the new surgeons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document