Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of mechanistic one-dimensional models and flow pattern transition boundaries predictions for two-phase pipe flows

2017 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 64-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Picchi ◽  
Pietro Poesio
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Uncertainty Quantification ◽  
Flow Pattern ◽  
Global Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Global Sensitivity ◽  
Pipe Flows ◽  
Flow Pattern Transition ◽  
Dimensional Models

Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis with dependent inputs: Application to the 2D hydraulic model of the Loire River

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Pheulpin ◽  
Vito Bacchi
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Uncertainty Quantification ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Global Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Hydraulic Model ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Traditional Methods ◽  
Global Sensitivity ◽  
Loire River

<p>Hydraulic models are increasingly used to assess the flooding hazard. However, all numerical models are affected by uncertainties, related to model parameters, which can be quantified through Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) and Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA). In traditional methods of UQ and GSA, the input parameters of the numerical models are considered to be independent which is actually rarely the case. The objective of this work is to proceed with UQ and GSA methods considering dependent inputs and comparing different methodologies. At our knowledge, there is no such application in the field of 2D hydraulic modelling.</p><p>At first the uncertain parameters of the hydraulic model are classified in groups of dependent parameters. Within this aim, it is then necessary to define the copulas that better represent these groups. Finally UQ and GSA based on copulas are performed. The proposed methodology is applied to the large scale 2D hydraulic model of the Loire River. However, as the model computation is high time-consuming, we used a meta-model instead of the initial model. We compared the results coming from the traditional methods of UQ and GSA (<em>i.e.</em> without taking into account the dependencies between inputs) and the ones coming from the new methods based on copulas. The results show that the dependence between inputs should not always be neglected in UQ and GSA.</p>

scholarly journals Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models

10.3982/qe866 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Harenberg ◽  
Stefano Marelli ◽  
Bruno Sudret ◽  
Viktor Winschel
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Uncertainty Quantification ◽  
Global Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Economic Models ◽  
Global Sensitivity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document