scholarly journals Incidental histological diagnosis of small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: are we underestimating their incidence?

HPB ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S551-S552
Author(s):  
S. Partelli ◽  
F. Giannone ◽  
F. Muffatti ◽  
S. Crippa ◽  
V. Andreasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Histological Diagnosis ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Is the Real Prevalence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Underestimated? A Retrospective Study on a Large Series of Pancreatic Specimens

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Partelli ◽  
Fabio Giannone ◽  
Marco Schiavo Lena ◽  
Francesca Muffatti ◽  
Valentina Andreasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Smoking Habit ◽  
Maximum Size ◽  
Histological Diagnosis ◽  
Main Diagnosis ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms ◽  
Mucinous Neoplasms ◽  
Median Diameter ◽  
Made In

Background/Aims: The annual incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) has been estimated to be around 0.8/100,000 inhabitants. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of incidental histological diagnosis of PanNET in pancreatic specimen evaluation for a purpose other other than PanNET diagnosis. Methods: One thousand seventy-four histopathological examinations of pancreatic specimens performed in 3 centers in Italy were retrospectively reviewed. All cases with a main pathological diagnosis of PanNET were excluded. Results: An incidental associated diagnosis of PanNET was made in 41 specimens (4%). Among those 41 cases, 29 (71%) had a largest diameter <5 mm (microadenoma), whereas the other 12 (29%) had a maximum size ≥5 mm (median diameter of the whole series = 3 mm, range 1–15). The association with a main diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) was significantly higher for patients who had an incidental PanNET (p = 0.048). There was no association between incidental diagnosis of PanNET and age, gender, BMI, smoking habit, diabetes, and type of operation. Conclusions: The frequency of incidental histological diagnosis of PanNET is considerably high, suggesting that their real prevalence is probably underestimated. The present study suggests a possible correlation between the incidental occurrence of PanNET and IPMN.

Proposal of a two-step dynamic prognostic stratification for stage IV sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Marotta ◽  
Thomas Walter ◽  
Cao Christine Do ◽  
Salvatore Tafuto ◽  
Vincenzo Montesarchio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Prognostic Stratification

Pre-operative Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors with Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in a Large Series

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Manta ◽  
Elisabetta Nardi ◽  
Nico Pagano ◽  
Claudio Ricci ◽  
Mariano Sica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasonography ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Chromogranin A ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Large Series ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Fine Needle

Background & Aims: Diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) is frequently challenging. We describe a large series of patients with p-NETs in whom both pre-operative Computed Tomography (CT) and Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) were performed. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected sporadic p-NET cases. All patients underwent both standard multidetector CT study and EUS with fine-needle aspiration (FNA). The final histological diagnosis was achieved on a post-surgical specimen. Chromogranin A (CgA) levels were measured. Results: A total of 80 patients (mean age: 58 ± 14.2 years; males: 42) were enrolled. The diameter of functioning was significantly lower than that of non-functioning p-NETs (11.2 ± 8.5 mm vs 19.8 ± 12.2 mm; P = 0.0004). The CgA levels were more frequently elevated in non-functioning than functioning pNET patients (71.4% vs 46.9%; P = 0.049). Overall, the CT study detected the lesion in 51 (63.7%) cases, being negative in 26 (68.4%) patients with a tumor ≤10 mm, and in a further 3 (15%) cases with a tumor diameter ≤20 mm. CT overlooked the pancreatic lesion more frequently in patients with functioning than non-functioning p-NETs (46.5% vs 24.3%; P = 0.002). EUS allowed a more precise pre-operative tumor measurement, with an overall incorrect dimension in only 9 (11.2%) patients. Of note, the EUS-guided FNA suspected the neuroendocrine nature of tumor in all cases. Conclusions: Data of this large case series would suggest that the EUS should be included in the diagnostic work-up in all patients with a suspected p-NET, even when the CT study was negative for a primary lesion in the pancreas.– . Abbrevations: CgA: chromogranin A; EUS: Endoscopic Ultrasonography; FNA: fine-needle aspiration; p-NETs: pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document