Large catchment-scale spatiotemporal distribution of soil organic carbon

Geoderma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 334 ◽  
pp. 175-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Kunkel ◽  
G.R. Hancock ◽  
T. Wells
Geoderma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 343 ◽  
pp. 60-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Hancock ◽  
V. Kunkel ◽  
T. Wells ◽  
Cristina Martinez

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 5235-5244 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Chappell ◽  
N. P. Webb ◽  
R. A. Viscarra Rossel ◽  
E. Bui

Abstract. The debate remains unresolved about soil erosion substantially offsetting fossil fuel emissions and acting as an important source or sink of CO2. There is little historical land use and management context to this debate, which is central to Australia's recent past of European settlement, agricultural expansion and agriculturally-induced soil erosion. We use "catchment" scale (∼25 km2) estimates of 137Cs-derived net (1950s–1990) soil redistribution of all processes (wind, water and tillage) to calculate the net soil organic carbon (SOC) redistribution across Australia. We approximate the selective removal of SOC at net eroding locations and SOC enrichment of transported sediment and net depositional locations. We map net (1950s–1990) SOC redistribution across Australia and estimate erosion by all processes to be ∼4 Tg SOC yr−1, which represents a loss of ∼2% of the total carbon stock (0–10 cm) of Australia. Assuming this net SOC loss is mineralised, the flux (∼15 Tg CO2-equivalents yr−1) represents an omitted 12% of CO2-equivalent emissions from all carbon pools in Australia. Although a small source of uncertainty in the Australian carbon budget, the mass flux interacts with energy and water fluxes, and its omission from land surface models likely creates more uncertainty than has been previously recognised.


2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
薛志婧 XUE Zhijing ◽  
马露莎 MA Lusha ◽  
安韶山 AN Shaoshan ◽  
王万忠 WANG Wanzhong

Geoderma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 368 ◽  
pp. 114286
Author(s):  
Scott M. Devine ◽  
Anthony T. O'Geen ◽  
Han Liu ◽  
Yufang Jin ◽  
Helen E. Dahlke ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e0220881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Rentschler ◽  
Philipp Gries ◽  
Thorsten Behrens ◽  
Helge Bruelheide ◽  
Peter Kühn ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. A. E. Hemamali ◽  
U. W. A. Vitharana ◽  
B. L. W. K. Balasooriya ◽  
C. P. Attanayake ◽  
W. S. Dandeniya ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 6793-6814 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Chappell ◽  
N. P. Webb ◽  
R. A. Viscarra Rossel ◽  
E. Bui

Abstract. The debate about soil erosion substantially offsetting fossil fuel emissions and acting as an important source or sink of CO2 remains unresolved. There is little historical land use and management context to this debate which is central to Australia's recent past of European settlement, agricultural expansion and agriculturally-induced soil erosion. We use "catchment" scale (∼25 km2) estimates of 137Cs-derived net (1950s–1990) soil redistribution of all processes (wind, water and tillage) to calculate the net soil organic carbon (SOC) redistribution across Australia. We approximate the selective removal of SOC at net eroding locations and SOC enrichment of transported sediment and net depositional locations. We map net (1950s–1990) SOC redistribtion across Australia and estimate erosion by all processes ∼4 Tg SOC yr−1 which represents a~loss of ∼2% of the total carbon stock (0–10 cm) of Australia. Assuming this net SOC loss is mineralised, the flux (∼15 Tg CO2-e yr−1) represents an omitted 12% of CO2-e emissions from all carbon pools in Australia. Although a small source of uncertainty in the Australian carbon budget, the mass flux interacts with energy and water fluxes and its omission from land surface models likely creates more uncertainty than has been previously recognised.


Geoderma ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 219-220 ◽  
pp. 14-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.B. Karunaratne ◽  
T.F.A. Bishop ◽  
J.A. Baldock ◽  
I.O.A. Odeh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document